Has Australia ‘over-invested’ in renewable energy? | RenewEconomy

Has Australia ‘over-invested’ in renewable energy?

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Spoiler alert: No. And energy minister Angus Taylor clearly hasn’t been paying attention to the history of our electricity infrastructure.

share
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

No. Minister Angus Taylor clearly hasn’t looked at the history of our electricity infrastructure. Renewable energy policy has been poorly designed, to some extent because of politicisation, and to some extent because no-one imagined it would grow this fast, driven by astounding cost reductions and technology developments.

Put it in perspective. Base load coal power stations have always produced ‘too much’ electricity overnight and on weekends. So electricity agencies offered low ‘off-peak’ prices to encourage more people to use this ‘waste product’.

They actively promoted off-peak electric hot water storage technologies and management controls. Indeed, a colleague of mine used to describe base load power stations as being like a car whose engine could not be turned off, so it would have to be left idling in the driveway.

Coal-fired power stations are also unable to supply peak demand – unless we have over-invested, so there is idle capacity available. And the prospect of failure of a large generation unit was managed by maintaining large amounts of ‘spinning reserve’ as well as investing in flexible generation such as hydro and gas turbines – which had low utilisation, but offered ‘insurance’. The load factor of Victoria’s coal power stations under the State Electricity Commission was around 60 per cent.

The Renewable Energy Target has been the main driver of renewable electricity. The Howard conservative government introduced it as part of its Kyoto ‘Safeguarding the Future’ commitments.

The Howard government also offered incentives of up to $4,000 per rooftop solar system before the 2007 election. Labor offered double – and won the election.

Then former rock star Minister Peter Garrett had to deal with the resulting budget blowout, which led to the redesign of the 2020 RET to separate small and large renewable energy targets, so the cost of PV incentives was shifted from the budget bottom line to electricity consumers, via electricity retailers.

State governments of all persuasions have offered populist (sometimes very generous) feed-in tariffs for PV exports. These are great vote winners.

Rational renewable energy policy that responded to evolving technologies, renewable energy technology prices and trends in demand would have looked very different.

Incentives would have been focused regionally, to avoid high cost electricity supply and high transmission and distribution losses near fringe of grid, and in areas where power line capacity was stressed. Policy would have incentivised development of complementary options such as demand response, demand management, energy storage and even Australia’s ‘forgotten fuel’ energy efficiency.

We are now, at last, seeing Western Power and Synergy in Western Australia adopting strategies that involve providing fringe of grid consumers high quality stand-alone electricity systems with ongoing maintenance support – which save both the consumer and the community money. But energy market rules block this on the east coast.

We need to listen to AEMO, CSIRO and a range of smart energy analysts, and implement rational and strategic clean energy policy (including demand side measures). The time for throwing rocks is well and truly over.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

3 Comments
  1. Ken Dyer 3 months ago

    I think Australia over invested in coal fired power at a time when electricity and energy was under government ownership. If that was still the case, Australia would be further along than now in transitioning to RE. Sadly, it isn’t and neo-liberal capitalism has created and promulgated a repressive and regressive energy
    regime that could quite possibly assist Australian into a recession.

  2. Ian 3 months ago

    What is the definition of ‘over invest’? It is the same as ‘waste money’. it’s the use of public money for projects or expenditure that a person does not approve of. If a coal power station is built the the renewables brigade would say that that is an over investment. If it’s subsidies for home solar , then the likes of the accc, or large utilities will say that’s over investment. What about utility scale solar farms gouging out the coal generators midday market, that’s,to the coalers, over investment.

    This sort of pseudo-technical term , loaded with connotations, is very common in our language, it’s useful to use in an us-and-them situation, but don’t be fooled by it.

    The author of the article is obviously in the renewables camp, but it’s clear that he does not particularly like the rooftop solar revolution that has opened up so much competition to the grid and opened up the electricity market to renewables.

    The grid is nice to have, but it’s just a plastic shopping bag to carry electricity to the home. It’s now one choice amongst others.

    We have got to get the emphasis right and that is empowerment of the individual, family, people, over companies, utilities, government institutions: these are ment to serve people, and not the other way ‘round.

  3. rob 3 months ago

    @giles you asked me for examples for bullshit adds on your site…..I just watched a so called add with mel gibson and walled alli……couldn’t grab a screen shot as the add had changed but it was a promo site for Bitcoin from past experience don’t ever ever link yourself to one of these adds…….harassing calls for the last 6 months.I did my best to catch it for you but they were to quick for me……BITCOIN FROM WHERE EVER has called me from london,paris new york sydney et al . I has been a shocking experience and is a bi daily occurrence ,all false numbers and despite me blocking all calls they simply continue…

Comments are closed.

Get up to 3 quotes from pre-vetted solar (and battery) installers.