This solar farm has to switch off every second day due to negative prices | RenewEconomy

This solar farm has to switch off every second day due to negative prices

When Australia reached its major milestone of 50% renewables on the main grid on Wednesday, this solar farm had to watch from the sidelines. It often does.


When Australia’s renewable energy portfolio reached its important milestone on Wednesday of providing 50 per cent of the main grid’s demand for the first time, one solar farm couldn’t be part of the fun, and had to look on from the sidelines.

The sight of wind and solar farms being switched off when wholesale electricity prices fall into negative territory has become increasingly common over the last few months, particularly in Queensland and South Australia.

But the facility that appears to have been affected the most has been the 95MW Tailem Bend solar farm in South Australia, owned by Vena Energy and operating since earlier this year.

Tailem Bend has an off-take agreement with Snowy Hydro that broadly requires it to switch off when wholesale electricity prices go into negative territory, although the details are likely to be more complex than that.

And Tailem Bend just so happens to be located in the state – South Australia – which already operates at more than 50 per renewables on a yearly average, and is often at more than 100 per cent, and so has the greatest propensity to experience negative prices.

Indeed, its average price for the month of October was lower than any other state in the main grid, including those dominated by coal. A month, incidentally, when South Australia’s grid emissions also fell, continuing the major reduction in emissions achieved over the last five years as coal was replaced by wind and solar.

But back to Tailem Bend. Over the last two months, negative prices have been occurring so often (due to low demand, good wind conditions and sunny skies) that this solar plant has been obliged to switch off virtually ever second day – on 14 different days in September and 18 days in October, and most days so far in November.

It’s common to see wind and solar farms switch off when prices go into negative territory, or get close to zero. It happens either because their off-take agreements oblige them to do so, or because they are “merchant” facilities that take the spot price and don’t want to be paying other parties to take their output if prices do go negative.

And they can also be “constrained” off due to a variety of often complex things happening on the grid.

It should be noted that this is pretty standard fare for all generators, be they wind, solar, gas or coal. You won’t see many peaking gas stations switched on at less than $100/MWh, or even at $150/MWh.

Some peaking gas plants operate just two per cent of the time. Some diesel plants, built under capacity payments, don’t switch on at all, because they are not needed, and if they did switch on they would lose money because the prices they would receive would not cover the cost of the diesel fuel.

In the days when coal reigned supreme, many plants had to switch off or ramp down at times of low demand, which used to happen exclusively at night (as opposed to during the day now, mostly due to the impact of rooftop solar).

Those coal plants that couldn’t or wouldn’t switch off were given something to do, so electric hot water systems were switched on only at night, and low tariffs offered to businesses to make things overnight. Now that solar is changing the demand curve, manufacturing and hot water systems are now looking to move back to day-time hours.

Still, the idea behind the low cost of wind and solar is that the relatively high capital costs of the facilities are more than made up by the negligible cost of generation (no fuel to pay for, because the sun and the wind come free). That business model usually dictates that they should operate whenever possible.

Most wind and solar farms can expect some level of constraints – because of weather situations, levels of demand, network issues and other stuff that is going on in the grid, and that’s part and parcel of how the electricity system operates – but it’s hard to imagine that a solar farm expected to be switched off this often.

This graph above,  provided by Global Roam, the authors of NEM Review providers of the popular NEM-Watch widget that can be found on RenewEconomy, shows examples of recent weeks when Tailem Bend was forced to switch off virtually every day.

The orange represents when the solar plant is generating, and how much. Look for the gaps in the orange and the thin brown line, and the white below that line. That indicates the solar plant was “available” but not generating. That’s not because of passing clouds, but because prices went negative (the green line).

The negative prices, and the switching off of Tailem Bend, has continued into November, including on Wednesday (Nov 6), the orange slab to the right in the graph above, when it appears to have turned off even though prices didn’t go negative (although they did go close, but maybe another factor was at play).

That was the time when the overall grid hit 50 per cent renewables for the first time.

Vena would not comment, because they said the terms of the off-take agreement were commercial-in-confidence (In Australia, parties to such deals won’t even reveal the price, let alone other conditions), but it did indicate that negative pricing events were not unexpected, and had been dialled into its business model.

Negative pricing events have been occurring regularly in Queensland as well, including on one day in early September when much of the state’s 20 plus fleet of solar farms switched off en masse, either because they were obliged to do so or because they didn’t want to take a hit from negative prices.

The creation of CleanCo may help change that situation, because it will now be inclined to deploy the previously little used 570MW Wivenhoe pumped storage facility, which acts like a giant battery, to charge during those low prices during the day, rather than during the night when it would help out the coal generator operator by its previous owner.

That might be enough to drag the prices out of negative territory on most occasions. Time will tell.

South Australian wind and solar farms will have to wait a little longer. It now has three batteries that can charge at low prices – Hornsdale, Dalrymple North, and now Lake Bonney – but these installations are still relatively small and are mostly busy doing other things, either on standby for emergency response or playing in the frequency and ancillary services market.

The new battery at Lake Bonney will do some FCAS, and may take some excess from the merchant component of Infigen Energy’s neighbouring 275MW wind facility of the same name, but it wouldn’t take long to fill.

Salvation, or less frequent negative pricing events, likely won’t come until the new interconnector to NSW is built, maybe by late 2023, and/or one of the first pumped hydro facilities in the state also come on line. A decision on funding the first of those projects is expected soon.

Meanwhile, just about every new large scale wind and solar project proposal, or wind and solar hybrid, is now coming with storage attached, and there are a growing list of huge projects that will likely propel the state towards its unofficial target of “net 100 per cent renewables” by around 2030, such as this solar and storage project contracted by Alinta.

Tailem Bend is also considering a battery storage, but the Vena people would not comment on where they were with that idea. Safe to assume, perhaps, that if the proposed second stage of Tailem Bend goes ahead, batteries will be included.

Note: Global Roam’s Paul McArdle has been digging into the reasons why Tailem Bend switched off on Wednesday and will report tomorrow.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

  1. mike bike 10 months ago

    profits are more important than logic? price the power at real levels so that the consumers aren’t ripped off by greedy companies… negative? bullshit…

  2. Chris 10 months ago

    Great article Giles.

  3. juxx0r 10 months ago

    You’d think that they could do a whip around to all those affected and raise the funds to build one of the pumped hydro facilities.

  4. George Michaelson 10 months ago

    So we’re all clear, the argument isn’t “do we need more transmission network” its “who is going to pay for it”

    I think we can be reasonably sure, us, the customers are going to pay for it, but the kicker is “who gets to make a fixed gold plated profit of making it, once we decide they have to pay for it”

  5. Hettie 10 months ago

    I wonder, has anyone done some sums on the revenue lost to curtailment in 12 months, vs the cost of building new transmission lines?

    Just asking. I know that $50 per MWh is not a lot of money, but when multiplied by all the MWhs that are lost to curtailment by all the wind and solar farms over a year it must add up to a very big pile of money.
    Just what would it cost to upgrade the transmission lives to carry the full load, and to install the storage to shift all those electrons from midday to the evening peak?
    It seems to me that as a nation we are over eager to whinge about the cost of doing something, and utterly uninterested in calculating the cost of not doing it. That balancing act has a name. It’s called calculating the cost benefit ratio. Australia needs to do a great deal more of it.

  6. Blair Valentine 10 months ago

    This just does my head in. If we really had a clue we would be pouring excess energy into grid scale batteries or some other type of storage. It just seems that there is no real plan by anyone in power to harness the great potential we have. Watching Angus Young the last few weeks is like watching the loonies runnig the asylum. After listening to the latest Energy Insiders podcast earlier today with Ross Garnaut it is obvious we have the tech, the will and the people – just not the right leadership.

    • topdown 10 months ago

      Fair to say that you guys voted them out?

      • Blair Valentine 10 months ago

        Unfortunately I don’t have faith in either of the major parties. Liberal being dead against climate action in many true regard and Labour not really having any real conrete policy. We need a step change. Look what happened today in NZ – if it can happen there, it should be able to happen here.

  7. Seriously...? 10 months ago

    It sounds to me as though SA is looking hard at powering industries with their excess power–exporting hydrogen, etc, exactly the sort of thing some commenters here bang on about. The match between generation and industry may be hard to make without government intervention. Likely there will be generation first, bringing prices down, then industry second. Where that leaves the generation owners in the gap, I’m not sure. But nobody said the New Industrial Revolution was going to be clean and simple. It doesn’t work like that…

  8. Les Johnston 10 months ago

    Seems like the off-peak hours need further analysis or a new category of energy demand developed to enable these low cost generators to be operated at design output rather than the current model which was never developed around renewable energy generators. Why cant this new type of energy utilisation be catered for in a smart economy? Sounds like we have a 20th century regulator running the show.

  9. Lord Stockton 10 months ago

    So why does the poor taxpayer have to put up $ to support a’ negative ‘ industry?

  10. Greg Hudson 10 months ago

    If the SA Govt changed off peak water heating from 11pm to 11am, Tailem Bend would suddenly have a market for all their curtailed power… Why is this not happening ?

Comments are closed.

Get up to 3 quotes from pre-vetted solar (and battery) installers.