The things some utilities will do to stop solar

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The FBI is investigating an Arizona power company for its role in the election of utility-friendly and anti-solar regulators.

Source: NexusMedia
Print Friendly, PDF & Email


Rooftop solar power is getting cheaper and cheaper, and nowhere in the US does that scare utilities more than in Arizona, where abundant sunshine makes solar an attractive option for many homeowners.

Over the last several years, the Arizona Public Service Company (APS), the largest power provider in the state, has tried thwarting rooftop solar by getting utility-friendly candidates elected to the Arizona Corporation Commission, which regulates the state’s utilities.

Now, APS is reportedlybeing investigated by the FBI over its political spending.

“The FBI is currently conducting a long-term investigation related to the financing of certain statewide races in the 2014 election cycle,” special agent Matthew Reinsmoen told the Arizona Republic in early June. In 2014, APSallegedly funded a political nonprofit that supported the candidacy of two utility-friendly Republican candidates for the regulatory commission. The nonprofit is not required to disclose its donors.

The allegations of wrongdoing suggest the lengths to which embattled utilities are willing to go to protect their interests. For most of its long history, APS steered clear of politics.

But, in recent years, the utility has supported the candidacy of utility-friendly Republicans running for seats on the five-member regulatory commission. Until recently, the commission included two Democrats.

Thanks in part to a concerted effort by APS, all five commissioners are now Republicans, most of whom oppose rooftop solar.

The investigation kicked off after the former chairman of the regulatory commission, Gary Pierce, was indicted for allegedly raising the rates for a water and sewer company in exchange for payments to his wife.

The FBI probe of Pierce led to an inquiry into APS, which had allegedly tried to influence Pierce by contributing to his son’s campaign for Arizona secretary of state.

Here’s a brief timeline of events. This draws from the reporting of the Arizona Republic and other local news outlets.

APS potitical activity

To understand solar’s threat to utilities’ financial interests, it helps understand how power companies work. Utilities make money by selling power to consumers, but rooftop solar allows ratepayers to generate their own power.

Furthermore, net metering policies, which require utilities to buy surplus electricity generated by rooftop solar panels, means that the utilities aren’t profiting off all the electricity they sell.

It’s not that utilities oppose solar power, per se — many are investing in large-scale solar projects, but many utilities are opposed to customers generating their own electricity and selling it to the grid.

Think of APS like a grocer who doesn’t want home gardeners selling vegetables in the town square — except this grocer enjoys a government-sanctioned monopoly.

Source: NexusMedia
Source: NexusMedia

Because the utility owns the transformers, transmission lines and other infrastructure needed to sell electricity, it is, by necessity, a monopoly. As it faces no competitors, regulators oversee the utility to ensure it keeps prices low and provides a high level of service.

In other words, regulators are charged with making sure the utility serves the public interest.

For a long time, this arrangement served both the public and the utility. Now, distributed solar is disrupting this model. Rooftop panels are shrinking electric bills, reducing pollution and making the grid more resilient. They are also taking a bite out of power utility profits.

The only recourse APS has to ward off cheap, distributed solar is to petition regulators to pass anti-solar policies.

What’s clear is that the old centralized model of power generation is under threat, and utilities are fighting back any way they know. Through targeted political spending, APS helped turn a bipartisan regulatory commission into a panel of anti-solar Republicans.

The FBI investigation could reveal how they did it.

Bob Burns, the lone Republican commissioner whose candidacy was supported by both APS and the solar sector, is also investigating the utility’s political activities.

He is suing to subpoena utility officials to learn whether they used ratepayer dollars “to capture the allegiance or influence the actions or attitudes of commissioners or candidates.”

APS is trying to block Burns’ investigation until after the regulatory commission rules on a proposed rate increase.

Jeremy Deaton writes for Nexus Media, a syndicated newswire covering climate, energy, policy, art and culture. You can follow him @deaton_jeremy.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

  1. George Darroch 2 years ago

    For comparison, Arizona’s solar potential is about 50% higher than Brisbane’s and among the highest in the world. If there’s anywhere where solar should succeed, it’s there.

    • john 2 years ago

      Brisbane is 27 degrees south of the equator the most southern part of Texas is 25 north so i do not think your Arizona is getting more solar than Brisbane

      • Gordon 2 years ago

        It rains a hell of a lot more in Brisbane/Qld than Arizona, ie a lot more cloud to block solar radiation.

  2. Grpfast 2 years ago

    If only we had FBI in Australia.

    • Brunel 2 years ago

      I thought USA allows foreign funding of political parties and that explains the support for Israel.

  3. john 2 years ago

    How can this company be so crass in their direction is all i ask?

  4. Brunel 2 years ago

    Beautiful map but no mention of price.

    What is the daily connection charge in Arizona?

    And what is the price of off peak electrons?

  5. Peter G 2 years ago

    Wow, about US $5 million was spent by the Utility on one side and solar city of the other on the election campaigns for Airizona regulators…

    Near the end the Utility backed chairman is quoted on technological innovation:
    “Technologies that invade privacy and take away personal responsibility are strongly discouraged,” he said.
    ie: Solar Leasing and ratepayers responsibility to contribute to Utility profits.

Comments are closed.

Get up to 3 quotes from pre-vetted solar (and battery) installers.