Solar PV to replace coal as “incumbent” technology

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Solar PV will move from being the “disruptive” technology to displace fossil fuels as the incumbent technology. But does the advent of cheap storage mean that households will disconnect from the grid? Either way, business models need to change, says CEC.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Australia is embarking on a radical transformation of its electricity system that will see solar PV transition from being “disruptive” technology to the “incumbent” technology, displacing coal and sparking a radical change in the way that electricity is provided.

David Green webThis is the assessment from Clean Energy Council CEO David Green (pictured), who in a presentation last week said generation will move from its traditional place at the point of supply to at or near the point of use; the primary role of the grid will be converted to that of a back-up “battery”; and consumers will play a key role in a more competitive market.

Green told a Davos Connection conference on infrastructure last week that the core logic behind having large scale generation plants close to their fuel source (coal or hydro) was being challenged by shifts in the basic cost parameters of many sources of energy allow generation (mostly solar) to be built closer to where it is used.

It was clear, he said, that solar PV has been taken up more rapidly in lower-income suburbs than higher income – because of the attraction for lower-income households to get a lower, fixed rate of electricity.

Now, new financing models – such as leasing and community ownership, as well as models for renters – was likely to spark a third wave of investment in solar PV.

“Further innovation in the business models will potentially unleash still more waves of investment until solar PV has fully transitioned from disruptive technology to the new incumbent technology,” Green says. (You can read the whole presentation here)

“In a similar way we are witnessing the battery energy storage market emerge. Like the solar PV market, it is initially focused on early adopters, but spreading quickly as the economic case for investment becomes favourable.”

Green says it is not yet clear whether the spread of low-cost energy storage will result in households disconnecting from the distribution grid entirely – seen as the most radical vision for a decentralized energy sector, and one that CSIRO entertained in its Future Grids analysis, and which has been raised by utilities in the US and elsewhere as either a great opportunity, or a horrendous threat.

“For the moment it would seem more likely that households will stay on the grid,” Green says. “But that the role of grid-supplied power will be inverted, from the primary source of power (supplemented by embedded generation like solar PV) to a safety net supplier of last resort, with embedded generation being the primary source of power.”

“Even this more moderate vision would require a fundamental rethink in the financial model for distribution network services businesses.”

Those comments fit in with the scenarios painted by the CSIRO, which suggested that customers were more likely to remain on the grid if the utilities adapted their business models. But it also made clear that a third or more customers could simply leave the grid if the utilities failed to act.

Green said it was clear that the pace of innovation in distributed generation technology, the demand by consumers for greater involvement in, and control of, the ownership and usage of electricity, and the international drive to address climate change are all promoting real and fundamental change.

“A ‘new normal’ has not yet been established but all the indications are that the emerging model will lower the cost of new infrastructure, improve competition and greatly improve the degree to which existing infrastructure is used efficiently.”

He noted that while many incumbents saw distributed generation as a niche, it was moving at such a speed that it was simply a matter of innovation and to what extent the “new entrants of today”are allowed to become the incumbents of tomorrow.

Green says that Australia has managed to shift around 13 per cent of its electricity generation to more decentralised renewable sources so far, with much of this also coming in the form of what he calls “modular” wind farms (they can be built with just a few turbines or more than a hundred).

But because this and solar are disruptive, it will be fiercely contested by those who benefit from the traditional system – the network operators and the fossil fuel producers.

“They will have an obvious tendency to resist change,” he says. “Others will embrace it. It is potentially an exciting and dynamic time for the energy sector to drive innovation and reach for the future.”

RenewEconomy’s Take: Green is right, and this speech is welcome. It is about time that the clean energy industry articulates such a vision for the future in a co-ordinated and vigorous manner. There is much at stake.

As in the US, there is a mixture between those who see opportunity, and those who see only threat. Right now, it appears, it is the latter dominating policy settings. The utilities are resisting change, and so are the government owners.

The carbon price is being wound back, the renewable energy target is under threat, and energy efficiency schemes are also being wound back. In the meantime, tariffs and regulations appear ready to be deployed to slow down the uptake of the solar and solar storage and other technologies. It should be a quite battle.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

  1. coomadoug 6 years ago

    In this link you will find a talk by an ANU professional that is a great foundation of facts and circumstances that will help us understand what is happenning.
    Deep into the article is the talk heading is Quarry Vision Coal,3549

    Grab a coffee and have a listen

  2. Alen 6 years ago

    When are utilities going to realise that there is no stopping the PV revolution? What person doesn’t like the idea that they can now generate their own electricity and thus increase their independence. The idea to me of having more control in an important aspect of my life is just to appealing to ever consider going back to purely relying on the network.

    • Adam Gilbert 6 years ago

      [What person doesn’t like the idea that they can now generate their own electricity and thus increase their independence.]

      Interestingly in the US, Tea Party types are quite enthusiastic about solar for those very reasons.The notion of being less reliant on a large utility, which may live under a favourable protection regime offered by government, is supposed to appeal to conservatives. Apparently it’s putting the Republicans in a spot of bother as they wish to continue their crusade against renewable energy while trying to contend with the “Get out of my way big government and utilities, I’ll make my own electricity thanks very much” mentality of the more libertarian elements of the party.

      • RobS 6 years ago

        This is very similar to the bipolar response of republicans to same sex marriage, half of them oppose it on religious grounds, a big and growing chunk support it on the basis that the core belief of libertarianism and right wing politics is about reducing government intrusion into our lives which means supporting the regulation of what we do in our bedrooms becomes rather hypocritical

  3. Alan Baird 6 years ago

    It would greatly upset me to leave the grid, but I’d adjust, over time. Especially the time I pay for merely being connected, not for the electricity. Yes, I would cry a few crocodile tears for the utilities, but they’d dry PDQ.

  4. RhysC 6 years ago

    The best thing about living off grid is that it encourages energy efficiency. If you still have a grid connection then you wont be as compelled to be efficient. Its not for everyone but most people who cut the cord also half their bill due to just being more conscious of their energy use.

    At the same time as a designer we need to allow for 3-5 times more storage to get them through rainy days (if no generator).

    It can be done in stages:
    Add solar
    Add storage
    Add more storage

    Also – How cool would it be if you could setup a micro grid and supply your neighbors excess energy!?

    • RobS 6 years ago

      Micro grids aren’t that useful if everyone’s source of power is solar, they become very useful when resources are diversified. For example a cluster of rural properties, one property on the top of a ridge with a wind turbine, the second on the north face of the hill with a solar array and a third guy on the side of the hill with a small creek with a micro hydro system. By sharing these diversified resources generator run time and storage requirements drop dramatically.

      • RhysC 6 years ago

        Yeah good point Rob.

        My main thing at the moment is that I will have about 8kW of PV and plenty of storage at my house but only need about 3kW so I want to do something with that excess energy.

    • JonathanMaddox 6 years ago

      I think the opposite may actually be true. If I’m off-grid and I have enough clean solar power to run the appliances I already have, I have no incentive whatsoever to upgrade to more efficient appliances. I’ll keep using the fridge I bought 25 years ago, even though a modern one uses perhaps one quarter of the energy.

      You can’t sell anything to your neighbours if you aren’t connected to them.

  5. Paul McArdle 6 years ago

    Thanks, Giles

    Here’s an article today on why the looming PV+storage transition need not be all doom-and-gloom for the incumbent network companies and gentailers:


Comments are closed.

Get up to 3 quotes from pre-vetted solar (and battery) installers.