Right, left, right, left, right: ALP marches to carbon oblivion | RenewEconomy

Right, left, right, left, right: ALP marches to carbon oblivion

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

After years building one of the world’s most sophisticated carbon pricing packages, the Labor Party is reportedly ready to abandon it. Those who have watched the Labor Right in action will not be surprised if this comes to pass. Here are some reasons why this may come to pass, and some why it won’t.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

If you believe the Fairfax press today, the Australian Labor Party appears poised to abandon its decade-long commitment to carbon pricing. After spending years building one of the world’s most comprehensive and sophisticated carbon pricing packages, it now seems ready to abandon it on the assumption that the best way to counter the new government’s seven-point Post-It note climate policy is to have no policy of its own.

That has a certain logic about it, resistible as it may be. The driving force behind the ALP’s internal machinations has nothing to do with the details of sound climate policy: it has everything to do with messaging, something it has been unable to master since Kevin Rudd attempted to thrust the CPRS on the nation in 2009. It’s inability to distinguish between a tax and a traded price has cost it power.

To believe the Fairfax story, Labor has now decided that its best prospects lie in hiding behind bushes and throwing stones at Abbott’s Green Army. And then it will pretend that it stands by carbon pricing as the best means for achieving an ambitious climate target, despite having ditched the idea at its convenience three times in the previous four years. And all this a day after a survey confirms that economists believe Direct Action to be an expensive absurdity, and a day before the Climate Change Authority releases its long-awaited emissions caps and targets report.

It’s not exactly clear that Fairfax has got this right. But those who have watched the Labor Right in action, even from within the ALP, will not be surprised at all if it comes to pass. Here’s some reasons why it might happen, and some why it won’t.

Here’s why Labor would do a back-flip on carbon pricing:

They are truly hopeless at the messaging on climate change. From the CPRS to the carbon tax, they have managed to shoot themselves in the foot even before raising the details of the policy above the parapet. Climate Change spokesman Mark Butler highlighted that confusion last week when he said Labor would support a repeal of the tax if it meant introducing a traded scheme. Australia already has one of those. Its starting date can be brought forward.

They are scared of slogans. The “axe the tax” and the “toxic tax” slogans have proved effective. Now Abbott’s team has produced “Electricity Bill”. He’s made it personal, and Shorten won’t stand for it. He’ll run instead.

The Labor right wing was disenfranchised by the Greens and wants to settle accounts. It has never truly embraced the idea of carbon pricing, and probably not even the science of climate change, but now that it is in power it can exact its revenge.

Business is putting enormous pressure on the ALP to allow the carbon price to be repealed before June 30, warning that it could lose out in the rhetoric over the chaos that would be caused if the carbon price was to extend beyond July 1 and the government introduced a “retrospective” bill. This is particularly true of the electricity industry. Labor may think that the dumber the Coalition policy, the more damage that is afflicted on the ALP.

It would be best to extract a compromise from the Coalition rather than leave that to “Carbon Clive” Palmer and his gang of four.

And here’s why they wouldn’t

Direct Action is still just a series of 7 dot-points on a piece of paper – or a series of post-it notes as one described it. It’s a small target, but it’s an un-missable one, and just the mere concept has no credibility among economists, apart from those who don’t accept that man has a role in the science, or that Australia should be doing something

The politics of 2014-16 will not be the same as the past three years. Action is again accelerating, the IPCC report appears to have had a powerful impact, China and the US are taking decisive action on coal-fired generation, and there is renewed momentum for an international deal to be sealed by Paris in 2015. The Abbott government, as we pointed out, can me made to look stupid on carbon pricing, given that China is moving to adopt it and that no credible economist who accepts the climate science thinks Direct Action is anything but a really dump and expensive idea.

The Climate Change Authority will release its caps and targets analysis on Wednesday. This will almost certainly recommend a 2020 emissions reduction target well beyond the reach of Direct Action, Abbott’s Green Army, and the emissions reduction fund. Labor could use the opportunity to talk of climate change policies in terms of actually addressing climate change, rather than aiming for the lowest common denominator.

Someone should sit down with Labor and explain electricity prices. The reduction of the carbon price will be barely visible given the ongoing increases in network costs and retail margins that will surely accompany the next set of price settings. Or they could make a virtue of rooftop solar and distributed generation before someone in the Coalition steals their thunder.

It would be such an historical cop out that Labor could, and would, never be trusted on the issue again. And it would reinforce its growing impression as an ineffective, politically pointless organisation that – despite the lessons of the past two terms – it remains obsessed with micro-politics.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

  1. johnnewton 7 years ago

    It would be the end of the ALP. And great for the Greens.

  2. Name 7 years ago

    It is a strange political world in which we live. Labor introduces a fixed price carbon system that would move to a capped emissions trading scheme in 2015-16. A media interview follows and Gillard says in response to a question that you can call it a carbon tax if you wish. It is then known for some odd reason as a carbon tax for the fixed price period by Labor and the whole scheme as a carbon tax by the Coal-ition. And therein lies the rub carbon tax means different things to different people.
    But here is the thing – if the existing clean energy legislation is being called a carbon tax by politicians then so should direct action. In fact direct action is more of a carbon tax than the clean energy legislation because it is unavoidable – it drains the tax purse even if you reduce your own emissions.
    The clean energy legislation operates by charging the polluters for their emissions, but the direct action carbon tax (let’s call a spade a spade) operates by taking our taxes and paying them to polluters. What is more under the clean energy legislation polluters pay and can recover their additional costs by increasing their product prices but the consumer can choose to avoid these passed on costs by seeking out other products with lesser or no carbon content and switch away from carbon usage, for example put solar photovoltaics on your roof top for your electricity supply.*
    The direct action carbon tax is worse no matter what we do we still have to pay the polluters from our tax. This carbon tax is unavoidable.
    So this must be a conundrum for poor old Bill Shorten he has to choose between the existing carbon tax system or a new carbon tax called direct action. What should he do deny the carbon tax system his party installed or the new carbon tax proposed by the new Government. He must be confused.
    David Rossiter
    * If your delivered electricity exceeds about 18c/kWh including GST, and most does, solar PV costs less than this without any subsidies at all.

  3. JohnRD 7 years ago

    At the moment the choices are a Clayton’s carbon price that isn’t high enough to have much effect and a Clayton’s direct action plan that looks like wasting money without achieving anything like what is needed to meet even our low 2020 emissions reduction target. The reality is that Abbot is not going to raise the carbon price to level where it will become effective so all defending the tax will do is take attention off direct action lite without doing anything to reduce emissions.
    Both the Greens and Labor should drop the tax and get on with putting pressure on for real climate action.

  4. MrMauricio 7 years ago

    The Liberals are governing form the rear view mirror and Labor is completely lost.Time for new,relevant political parties.

Comments are closed.

Get up to 3 quotes from pre-vetted solar (and battery) installers.