NSW flags wind farm planning changes as it seeks to move turbines

NSW Planning Minister Pru Goward has flagged new planning rules for wind farms as she laments that wind turbines are turning regional areas into “industrial zones”

gullen rangeGoward, a noted opponent of wind farms who has tried to prevent the ACT government from funding wind farms in the region, is also trying to force Chinese project developer Goldwind to move 9 turbines at its Gullen Range wind farm near Crookwell (pictured).

The government is demanding the turbines be taken down and moved – in what would be a first – because they were not constructed where the planning approval allowed. Some were constructed 150m away from their approved siting.

Goward also flagged more investigations into the “health impacts” of wind turbines.

Goward made here comments in an interview with 2GB’s Alan Jones, himself a vigorous anti-wind (and anti-solar and anti CSG) campaigner, who has elicited Joe Hockey’s “utterly offensive” comment about wind turbines, and Tony Abbott’s complaint about the cost of renewables.

“You know how I feel about turbines, and they’re all through my electorate and I’m very conscious of the impact that they are having,” Goward said in her interview with Jones.

“And that is why we now have given the company (Goldwind) 21 days to do what is right and move at least nine that we recognise no Court could defend.” If the turbines are not moved, the NSW government says it intends to take legal action to force them to do so.

Jones, typically, railed against what he said were the “health impacts” of wind farms, saying they were dangerous to anyone living within 10kms of a turbine.

“There’s any amount of scientific evidence, that anyone within 10kms of wind turbines has health problems,” Jones said. “And there’s international scientific evidence, which your Department won’t present to you, which they ought to, that will dramatically prove that this is a public health disaster.”

Goward replied that she had asked health minister Jillian Skinner to investigate the health impacts of wind farms. “Jillian Skinner’s Department has been very involved in looking at that research,” she said.

“And we’ll have more to say about the future of wind farm development, particularly in regions where, as you say, there are lots of small land owners, who came to enjoy the landscape.

“We’re not talking about primary production, we’re talking about people who came for lifestyle reasons and they now find they’re region turned into an industrial zone.

“So that’s why the Department will now run the Community Consultation processes …”

As RenewEconomy noted earlier this week, it is the hatred of wind farms that is driving much of the Coalition’s push against the renewable energy target – at both the federal and the state level.

gullen range. 2jpg

Comments

22 responses to “NSW flags wind farm planning changes as it seeks to move turbines”

  1. Vincent Selleck Avatar

    Try living within 10 kms of a coal fired electricity generating plant. Does the fact that Beijing has outlawed burning or selling coal in order to promote better health for its citizens create a doubt about the safety of coal. Or am I just demonizing it, like the Libs are doing with wind. The real issue is wind can be effective to generate large amounts of electricity – like the day recently when all of SA power came from wind alone. They don’t like unpredictable contests to base load stations. How can stupidity have such a large voice?

  2. Albert Sjoberg Avatar
    Albert Sjoberg

    Arguing with those that deny anthropogenic climate change is like playing chess with a pigeon.

    No matter how good you are, the bird is going to shit on the board and strut around like it won anyway.

    1. Motorshack Avatar
      Motorshack

      Great image, but it makes me wonder. If Tony Abbott’s government were dumped overboard a hundred miles out to sea, do you suppose they would be able to find their own way home again?

      1. Matthew Dawes Avatar
        Matthew Dawes

        Not if they didn’t have there passport.

      2. Rob G Avatar
        Rob G

        I certainly hope not.

  3. howardpatr Avatar
    howardpatr

    Goward and her friend, Angus Taylor, the Member for Hume and warrior against wind turbines at it again. Alan Jones will be so pleased.

  4. Andrew Thaler Avatar
    Andrew Thaler

    I don’t think there is ANY evidence of adverse health impacts of living within 10kms of wind farms… Goward, Jones and Angus Taylor for that matter, either put the ‘evidence’ they claim to ‘have’ up for proper public scrutiny or they should accept the overwhelming consensus of opinion and let the world get on with things.
    Angus Taylor, I understand, hates wind turbines because his family picked the wrong horse and rejected the offer of turbines on their farms and their neighbours (who now have turbines) won’t be going bankrupt and won’t therefore sell out for peanuts to the Taylors… if he was really honest that is the reason he hates wind turbines.
    Wind turbines have not altered the visual landscape, they have altered, for the better, the economic landscape that reduces opportunities for vultures like the Taylors to prey upon. His Sister-in-Law Bronnie is running in the NSW election for the Nationals… you know the party that loves CSG because there are no adverse impacts from CSG is there!

  5. Chris Fraser Avatar
    Chris Fraser

    If a wind turbine reminds you of industry, I suggest living in Port Kembla. “That’s not an industrial zone, THIS is an industrial zone !”

      1. Chris Fraser Avatar
        Chris Fraser

        It may have been a clerical error, but the Electrolytic Refining and Smelting chimney (the formerly very tall one) was built right next to Port Kembla Public School. No doubt the sickness cluster and lead outfall survey contributed to the school’s relocation.

        1. MorinMoss Avatar
          MorinMoss

          Clerical errors exist on paper – but who where the spineless idiots who proceeded with building such a structure right next to a school ?

  6. Les Johnston Avatar
    Les Johnston

    It is a reflection of the lack of scientific credibility of those making comments about wind turbines relative to the air emissions from fossil fueled combustion engines, diesels in particular, for which there is no safe level. It would be appropriate for those same persons to investigate the scientific evidence associated with fine particles emitted from diesel exhausts and reconsider their nonscientific opinions relating to wind turbines.

  7. Tim Buckley Avatar
    Tim Buckley

    Unbelievable. Pru Goward should join Alan Jones and they can both go together and live in Acland next door to New hope’s lovely, environmentally friendly coal mine there. Or move in next door to one of Santos’ lovely CSG wells, or pick any one of those beautiful coal-fired power plants – any of the coal power plants AGL bought on the cheap will do – I’m sure Pru would be fine living there given the emission standards for these aging facilities were updated not 20 or so years ago. No nitrous oxide or sulphur oxide fumes to worry about. Or maybe she could move to Newcastle and get a place on the cheap next door to an uncovered coal train or coal storage dump. Last I checked most people in NSW used electricity – wind and solar are by far the least offensive sources of electricity.
    I though the NSW government was pressed for funds? Why would they waste more tax payer money looking into the non-existent health impacts of a wind farm? Surely they can just read the last 10 government funded studies done in recent years.

    1. ID635 Avatar
      ID635

      Your an expert on environmental health issues of coal as well as financial analysis? Well done Tim.

      1. Tim Buckley Avatar
        Tim Buckley

        Troll? Why hide behind a fake name?

        1. ID635 Avatar
          ID635

          Stating facts, something that you seem unfamiliar with

  8. Alan Avatar
    Alan

    Duke Energy’s Shirley Wisconsin Wind Development a “Hazard to Human Health” Declares Brown County Board of Health

    October 14, 2014.

    The Brown County Board of Health voted tonight to declare the Shirley Wind Turbine Development a Human Health Hazard.

    The decision was based on a report of a year-long study conducted by the Enz family with assistance from Mr Rick James to document acoustic emissions from the wind turbines including infrasound and low frequency noise, inside homes within a radius of 6 miles of the Shirley Wind turbines.

    The wording of the motion was as follows:

    “To declare the Industrial Wind Turbines in the Town of Glenmore, Brown County. WI. a Human Health Hazard for all people (residents, workers, visitors, and sensitive passersby) who are exposed to Infrasound/Low Frequency Noise and other emissions potentially harmful to human health.”

    The context is in reference to Brown County Code 38.01 in the Brown County Ordinances, in Chapter 38, relating to Public Health Nuisance (section (b) Human Health Hazard).

    “Human Health Hazard” means a substance, activity or condition that is known to have the potential to cause acute or chronic illness or death if exposure to the substance, activity or condition is not abated.

    The vote to declare it a Human Health Hazard now puts Duke Energy’s Shirley Wind Development on the defensive to prove to the Board they are not the cause of the health complaints documented in the study, and could result in a shut down order.

  9. Rob G Avatar
    Rob G

    The liberal party rears its ugly anti renewable head yet again. When they pull out the old ‘health risk’ excuse then you know exactly what you’re dealing with. They have to go if Australia is to make any progress.

  10. Ronald Brakels Avatar
    Ronald Brakels

    Wind turbines were built in the wrong spot? Does this actually cause anyone any real inconvenience? If not, leave the turbines where they are and make the developer pay a fine so they’ll be more careful next time. If it somehow does inconvenience someone then let them attempt to negotiate compensation before going through the expense of moving them. Call me cynical but I doubt they would make a coal mine close down under similar circumstances. Noxious and polluting fine, clean and green kill it, is no way to run a country, or a state.

    1. Chris Fraser Avatar
      Chris Fraser

      We still have to resolve a small matter of Planning Ministers not knowing what defines ‘industrial zone’ …

  11. Alan Baird Avatar
    Alan Baird

    Here we go again. She doesn’t have to be stupid but it sure is of considerable assistance.

  12. pukukta Avatar
    pukukta

    Townies moving to a rural area for the landscape forget that it is already an industrial zone – it’s called “Primary Industry” and it involves small and large scale machinery operating at all hours, crop dusting, use of firearms for animal welfare, crop protection and feral animal control, road maintenance, fencing, heavy vehicle transport, communications towers etc …………. If you want no noise, picture perfect view fields like you find on biscuit tins then move to a National Park in Tasmania, live in a tent and hug trees ….. meanwhile, some of us will continue to work long hours to fund your welfare dependency (and travel perks for those in politics) through the provision of food on your table and clean renewable energy that powers your computers and smart phones which our cattle can scratch their backs on …… oh….and sorry ….. I almost forgot to mention the health effects of a propeller being built within 10kms of where I live …… the infrasound from a wind turbine is similar to that of a single person walking past you ………….. so …… if someone walks past you within 10kms then you will exposed to the horror of infrasound ….. that’s rather a challenge in the city so perhaps some of our educated, amazing, and so so talented politicians (sorry – genuine leaders with the interests of the nation at heart) would like a tent in the Tassie World Heritage Area to avoid the horror of the propeller – in the meantime leave the rest of us alone to continue feeding the nation.

Get up to 3 quotes from pre-vetted solar (and battery) installers.