Know your NEM: Will the LRET be met?

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Will Australia’s large-scale renewable energy target be met on time? And what will happen if we move to a CET? Plus AGL’s uncontroversial result; and crunching numbers on SolarReserve’s Port Augusta project.

share
Figure 5: electricity volumes
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

News of the week

Plenty of focus on the AGL result. There were many points arising from what was an uncontroversial result. Above all else we’d note that AGL is doing a good job on cost control.

  • Provides early FY18 guidance roughly  in line with market consensus of $940-$1040 m midpoint $990 m up 23% on FY17
  • Firms up investment plans in
    • $900 m, 433 MW Coopers Gap Wind farm, likely through PARF. AGL has $200 m committed to PARF and its cash commitment to this farm will be small in the AGL scheme of things.
    • $250 m Silver Springs gas storage 100 TJ per day
    • $250 m Crib Point Vic LNG import facility 100 PJ per year, landed cost at current rates around A$8-A$10 GJ
    • $295 m South Australia Reciprocated gas engine 210 MW power station.
  • Recommits to FY22 closure of 2 GW Liddell power station
  • FY18 cash conversion (operating cash flow/ebitda) expected to be 100% or greater as futures guarantees unwind.
  • Negative in result was underlying volume trend continues to decline, down 1% on AGL weather adjusted estimate.

So the take on this is that AGL is reemphasising gas and doesn’t, as yet, have a strategy for how to deal with declining competitiveness of grid delivered electricity.

Coopers Gap brings the REC price back into focus

Will the LRET target be met? There is widespread agreement that calendar 2018 will be tight. We don’t have an opinion on 2018 but our numbers suggest that its more likely than not that by 2020 there will be 6 GW of new wind & PV. Our numbers below don’t include any West Australian projects but they do include about 400 MW of output where there will be voluntary surrender of certificates.

Figure 1: Souce: ITK estimates
Figure 1. Source: ITK estimates

To get into those totals the criteria was basically Final Investment Decision [FID] – however, we have also included the Edify Energy, Lincolns’ Gap and the PARF Cooper’s Gap projects.

We are quite confident that Goldwind will do a further 300MW from its Moorabool Victoria project.

If the various Lyons Group projects were to proceed that would push the total over the line.

You can also see from the table that despite the current excitement around PV that wind has about a 60 per cent share of what’s been announced in the past couple of years.

What will happen to the LRET scheme if we move to a CET?

There may not even be a CET, of course, but we are betting there will be one. We don’t know what will happen but we expect that the most likely thing is the two schemes will be rolled into one for administrative simplicity.  Notwithstanding that there won’t be double dipping it is possible that this could provide a pathway for projects to get credits beyond 2030 and also deal with the risk of the marginal  certificate  price falling to zero if the LRET target is exceeded.

The Port Augusta solar thermal project isn’t economic at $78/MWh and $650 m cost

SolarReserve states that this project will produce 495 GWh per year. At a price of $78/MWh that’s around $39 million revenue  a year. Comparing that revenue, never mind any opex, that’s a payback of 16 years, which is clearly not commercial.

Opex is probably going to be in the order of $10/MWh. Even that will be a low number in our view. So that pushes the payback to about 18.5 years. We see an IRR (before tax) of 3%. The after tax IRR would be lower. If ebitda s around $36 m and depreciation (over 20 years) $32 m there won’t be much tax anyway.

The project benefits from a $110 concessional equity finance package from the Federal Govt. Exactly what concessional equity finance is I  don’t know. But it seems like a good thing to have.

We don’t know what’s going to happen to the REC certificates. It’s not even clear the project will be built in time to get in ahead of the 2020 deadline.

In short its great news for renewable energy and Port Augusta but we’d treat the economics with caution just yet.

Turning to the weekly action

  • Volumes:. Were weak down 3% across the NEM and 4% in NSW. Public holidays and warm weather probably impacted.
  • Future prices This was a nothing week for futures. Prices didn’t move.
  • Spot electricity prices .  at say $80-$90 MWh across the NEM were very high compared  to last year, well over 100% up, but actually down a bit on last week. Qld remains the lowest.
  • REC. Prices were unchanged

Gas prices  started to soften. Its clear now that gas prices at over $8 GJ are staying high but there has been no repeat of last year’s extreme pressure and supply shortage. Pelican Point now has gas to operate from both ORG and STO so together with other South Australian initiatives supply security is improving dramatically.

  • Utility share prices. In the end AGL shares fell post result as the good news was already in the share price. APA shares have had a soft year down 8% and unusually significantly underperforming the ASX 200. It’s not that APA has done much wrong, but the market doesn’t see the next growth leg to justify the high premium the stock traditionally trades on.
Figure 2: Summary
Figure 2: Summary

Share Prices

Figure 3: Selected utility share prices
Figure 3: Selected utility share prices

 

Figure 4: Weekly and monthly share price performance
Figure 4: Weekly and monthly share price performance

Volumes

Figure 5: electricity volumes
Figure 5: electricity volumes

Base Load Futures, $/MWH

rsz_screen_shot_2017-08-15_at_121218_pm

 

 

Figure 10: Baseload futures financial year time weighted average
Figure 10: Baseload futures financial year time weighted average

Gas Prices

Figure 11: STTM gas prices
Figure 11: STTM gas prices

 

Figure 12 30 day moving average of Adelaide, Brisbane, Sydney STTM price. Source: AEMO
Figure 12 30 day moving average of Adelaide, Brisbane, Sydney STTM price. Source: AEMO

David Leitch is principal of ITK. He was formerly a Utility Analyst for leading investment banks over the past 30 years. The views expressed are his own. Please note our new section, Energy Markets, which will include analysis from Leitch on the energy markets and broader energy issues. And also note our live generation widget, and the APVI solar contribution. 

 

 

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

10 Comments
  1. Malcolm M 2 years ago

    Could SolarReserve be hoping to build the Port August power station for much less than the $650 m ? Or is it aiming to produce power over and above that required for the State government which it could sell onto the spot peak market ?

    Part of the earlier plans were for State government assistance through a power purchase agreement for an initial station at Port Augusta, followed by additional stations from market finance at Olympic Dam and Leigh Creek, where the solar resource is 10% better than at Port Augusta. So the Port Augusta plant is a learning exercise, after which costs are likely to come down.

  2. John 2 years ago

    Re the Solar Thermal project for Port Augusta, my understanding is that even though SolarReserve is committed to sell electricity to the SA Sate Government at $78/mWh, they will able to sell any excess at a premium to the open market once the Govt demand drops towards late afternoon.
    See RE lead article today…..
    …. “The government load peaks in the middle of the day, and the rest of the
    market’s load peaks at six or seven in the evening,” Weatherill [SA Premier] said.

  3. Peter F 2 years ago

    I think the state government committed to 80% of the output. As the rest will be sold mostly at peak it is likely to be 350GWhr at $78 and 140TWhr at $130 i.e. $44m about 15% more revenue for exactly the same cost. in terms of ROI that adds another 2%. not great but a lot better than the whole lot at $78

  4. Kevan Daly 2 years ago

    “So the take on this is that AGL ……….doesn’t, as
    yet, have a strategy for how to deal with declining competitiveness of
    grid delivered electricity.”

    I’m sure they are going to continue to struggle with this as they are trying to walk both sides of the issue with their mini-grid trials in SA.

  5. Alastair Leith 2 years ago

    Jay Weatherill made it clear in the presser that govt load demand peaks in the middle of the day, when excess PV behind the meter is spilling to market, meaning Aurora can be doing more thermal charging and less dispatching in the middle of the day. Whether SolarReserve have to buy in the low spot market and provide to govt (i.e. arbitrage of a sort) or the PPA allows them to only dispatch in times need/price >$75/MWh is anybodies guess but the mechanics is there. That allows them to play the evening shoulder as often as possible. Not sure what they’ll be doing in winter with a week of cloud cover, but they’ll be buying in the market to cover it.

  6. Simon 2 years ago

    Surely the $78 is not the bundled price and excludes LGCs? Ten years worth of LGCs, even at a falling price, may make enough difference.

    • Kevfromspace 2 years ago

      Turns out you’re right, Simon.

  7. Gordon 2 years ago

    David, a question about the NEM widget, are people exporting to the grid from batteries at night, or is there some sort of widget error, as I noticed 4MW of small PV generation in NSW at 19:25, about 2 hours after sunset for the main generating areas of NSW, see attached image. (and still 2MW at 19:40)

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/1ec27c229f9019c10176b6d03168eefd22a758ed566efe923abd3f0951580c10.gif

    • The Awul Truth 2 years ago

      I think that’s exports from batteries. definitely is in our house.

  8. Steve_Ohr 2 years ago

    Wouldn’t that suggest that the ‘concessional equity finance ‘ is really just a zero-interest $110 million loan? Where the govt gets their cut as equity?

    What does it do to the IRR calculations if you factor in free money?

Comments are closed.

Get up to 3 quotes from pre-vetted solar (and battery) installers.