Is it already too late for traditional utilities?

A leading US energy analyst has warned that the conventional electricity industry is facing a major “thunderstorm” from distributed energy resources, and it may already be too late to save the traditional business model.

Fereidoon Sioshansi, from the California-based Merlo Energy, told representatives of Australia’s incumbent energy industry at a conference in Sydney that their traditional business were being rapidly eroded.

There were clouds on the horizon from the reduction of demand from the grid that was occurring in most developed countries, and the growing increase in renewables.

“But the news gets worse,” he told the Eastern Australia’s Energy Markets Outlook 2013 conference. The major threat – the thunderstorm – was coming from distributed energy resources, which included self generation from solar and fuel cells, energy storage and the impact of energy efficiency.

“Together, they are the perfect storm,” he said. Even if the “regulatory fiat” afforded the incumbent industry could prevail, it was clear that efficiency was growing, “negawatts” (reduced consumption) were cheaper than building new “megawatts of power, and many countries had reached saturated markets for energy.

“The golden days are over,” Sioshansi said. “Those were the days when we could build larger plants, and new plant comes into service bring down average cost of network. But rising prices are forcing consumers to conserve and it forces them to self generate.”

He cited developments in California, where the regulator was targeting “zero net energy” for new homes by 2020, and for commercial buildings by 2030. In Japan, 80 per cent of new houses had solar PV, and one half had fuel cells.

“We are going to see a revolution. It is happening rather dramatically,” Siosanshi said. “I believe that the electric supply industry will soon approach a tipping point where consumers will provide electricity cheaper than industry can deliver.

“Some people think this is disruptive technology and there is not much we can do to turn it around.”

He said it was clear that the traditional business model is unsustainable, and if incumbents responded by introducing higher fixed tariffs, consumers would be tempted to “cut the chord” altogether.

Consumers would put in solar, fuel cells and storage.  “It is not as far-fetched as some people say,” he said. “Millions have done it with land lines and mobile phones. Utilities have got to rethink the value proposition. Things are happening much faster than we thin.  We will see more change in next 5 years than in previous 50.

And it may already be too late for utilities, because as the Edison Power Institute in the US said recently, the industry failed to get ahead of the game.

Comments

5 responses to “Is it already too late for traditional utilities?”

  1. barrie harrop Avatar
    barrie harrop

    Its already happening ,we have developing a pipeline of direct energy supply to Industrial customers in the 20 MW–40 MW range who want to control costs.

    http://www.remotenergy.com/HOME.html

    1. Harry00 Avatar
      Harry00

      Barrie how do you supply large industrial customers off grid with 20-40mw of renewable energy?

      1. barrie harrop Avatar
        barrie harrop

        Happy to discuss off -line,my contact details are on our web site,its site specific solutions.

  2. kenn0223 Avatar
    kenn0223

    First off, the comparison to telecom is flawed for a number of reasons;
    1. Consumers demand ultra high reliability from their electric supply and are willing to accept a far lower level of reliability from their mobile phone provider and device manufacturer.
    2. Commercial & Institutional users have an even higher reliability demand.
    3. Currently no combination of distributed technologies can match the long term reliability provided by the traditional utility model.
    4. There hasn’t been an abandonment of the “old style” telecom system. Only the inefficient & costly, “last mile” portion of the system is declining. The bulk voice & data systems are growing and nearly all telecom provers have embraced this because its a higher margin business. Wouldn’t it be great if we could keep all of the efficiencies associated with centralized generation (including the low cost wind farms and large solar projects) and bulk transmission and just ditch the distribution system?

    While a subset of consumers are interested in transitioning to their own generation (and required storage & power quality devices), the vast majority are apathetic to the issue. Sure, they may install solar panels on their roof, but I expect the vast majority of users are unwilling to commit to supplying and managing their own generation. What are cost and policy implications of either forcing these customers to buy and manage their own generation?

    While for many individual consumers, self-generation and/or disconnecting from the network is the right financial decision it is not the fiscally or socially responsible decision for their community. By taking your energy supply into their own hands you are essentially saying everyone should do so, but who pays for this transition? Is the customer who self-generates willing to pay for their low-income neighbor to buy solar panels? What about paying more in taxes so their local hospital and school can do so? Are they willing to pay more at the grocery store for their conversion? What about more for their mobile phone or internet service?

    Until and unless a customer who self-generates is will to pay for the cost to transition their entire community to self-generation (or whatever else) their individual transition and reduced contributions to the cost of operating the electricity system are purely self-serving and unjust to society.

    1. Harry00 Avatar
      Harry00

      Wow wow wow you have made the point ive been trying to make the whole time on this site.

Get up to 3 quotes from pre-vetted solar (and battery) installers.