ACT won't back NEG in current form, despite intense pressure | RenewEconomy

ACT won’t back NEG in current form, despite intense pressure

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

ACT energy minister Shane Rattenbury says Territory under “enormous pressure” to agree to NEG, but that won’t be happening in the policy’s current form.

Source: AAP
Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Rattenbury, far left, at a meeting of the COAG energy council.

ACT energy minister Shane Rattenbury has again stressed that the Australian Capital Territory government would not support the federal Coalition’s National Energy Guarantee in its current form, despite what he described as “enormous pressure” on the states to wave through the policy.

Speaking in a webinar hosted by the Smart Energy Council on Tuesday morning, Rattenbury said the ACT still had a “lot of concerns” about the NEG, the main one being that it would not deliver the energy policy that Australia needed in a carbon constrained world.

“The ACT has been very clear that we cannot sign up to the deal in its current form,” Rattenbury said.

“The 26-28 per cent emissions reduction target is clearly not ambitious enough, and will make the task (of decarbonisation of the economy) more costly, more difficult and certainly more politically difficult than cutting from electricity sector.

“We are also skeptical about the NEG bringing down electricity bills,” he added. “And if other sectors are going to have to do heavy lifting (on emissions reduction), then it will lift costs in other key areas, like food and transport.”

Rattenbury said the ACT also had “significant concerns” about the use of offsets, as proposed in the NEG; about the lack of additionality for state climate action, and the lack of a mechanism to ratchet up emissions reduction ambition in the future.

“We are, I should add, also very concerned that (federal energy minister) Josh Frydenberg is trying to lock in an answer from the states by August 10, and then has to go back to the party room.

“We would like to have some assurance that there will be no deals made (for the subsidisation of new coal) after the fact,” he said.

Roger Price, the CEO and chairman of Australian renewable energy company Windlab, was even more damning about the NEG, warning it would result in another investment freeze, like that which brought the industry to its knees during the Abbott years of the Coalition government.

Price describes the NEG as an “awkward compromise” and said his company’s position was most definitely that there should be no NEG, instead of a bad NEG.

“We are influencing all of … the stakeholders that we are better off without the NEG,” he told the webinar on Tuesday morning.

“(It) lacks market transparency, I believe it’s massively over-regulated, and I think it has …competition problems,” Price said.

“We don’t have a reliability issue (on the NEM)… So, how much do we really want to further gold plate things to lift (reliability) by another fraction of a per cent?

“The only faults we do get are in distribution system… so we’re really punching at shadows.

“So, the only reason the NEG is there is for emissions, (which means) therefore there is simply no reason to have it there… It will overburden the industry with regulation.”

The comments from Rattenbury and Price come as the August 10 deadline looms ever closer, and as pressure mounts from the federal government, and some energy industry lobbyists, for the states to come to heel and agree to the NEG.

“The overwhelming message states are getting from industry in general and even parts of the renewable energy sector, is ‘oh, it’s not great, but we need certainty, and then we can (make changes) later’,” said Price.

“It’s up to us to counter that message.”

Added Rattenbury: “What we certainly need is good policy. We don’t have it with the NEG at the moment…

“I would urge people to get out there… There is clearly enormous pressure to finalise this, the ACT is getting enormous pressure. There are people trying to crush our dissent.”

The comments also happen to coincide with the long-awaited release of the Australian Energy Market Operator’s Integrated System Plan.

As we reported here, the ground-breaking study from AEMO has confirmed that the cheapest and smartest way to replace Australia’s ageing coal power fleet is to build more solar, wind and storage technologies.

This was not, however, the interpretation of much of the mainstream press, including the ABC, who chose to report – as AEMO’s main message – that was coal power would be needed for decades, and that the life of old clunkers like Liddell in NSW should be prolonged.

Rattenbury did not come away with the same take on the report.

“I see (the ISP report) has been run in the press as backing up coal,” he said during the webinar.

“I don’t think that is accurate. … What I take from AEMO report is that when coal reaches the end of its life, we need to have something to replace it.

“Under the NEG, we will actually reach a cliff. We need to make sure the new capacity is there, or energy prices will go through the roof,” he said.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

  1. MaxG 2 years ago

    A politician with a spine… let’s see how long he will last. I certainly agree with what he reportedly said… good luck to all of us.

    • Peter Campbell 2 years ago

      I hope the Labor states show some spine to and don’t leave him hanging out to dry on his own.

      • john 2 years ago

        they wont

        • Peter Campbell 2 years ago

          They won’t show spine or they won’t hang him out to dry?

          • john 2 years ago

            I am afraid they will not have enough backbone to support him.

          • neroden 2 years ago

            Yeah. If you live in Queensland, NSW, Victoria, or South Australia, or even Tasmania, call your government officials and demand that they reject the NEG. Remind them that the studies show that it’s *worse than nothing*.

  2. Patrick Comerford 2 years ago

    Shane Rattenbury, the next Jay Weatherill. The minister from the smallest state/territory is showing the other Labour State energy ministers how to lead with some straightforward talking and standing up for what is right. It’s a waste of effort expecting any knock back of the NEG from the gutless LNP state energy ministers they will just cowtoe to their crooked mates in Canberra but the Labor state ministers can continue to show the leadership they have showed so far in embracing RE and good emissions targets by supporting Shane’s lead and ensure we end up with an energy plan that will ensure the transition to a smart fit for purpose grid and not lumber the nation with a big white elephant which is what the NEG surely is.

    • Peter Campbell 2 years ago

      I wouldn’t put it past the Labor states to (shamefully) agree to the NEG, knowing that the ACT Green will reject it. Then they get to have their cake and eat it – different messages for different audiences and a green to blame. Perhaps Rattenbury needs to say to to the Labor states: ‘Unless you reject it with me, I will pass it’?

  3. Joe 2 years ago

    Stay the course Minster Shane. Don’t be bullied by Two Tongues Turnbull, Frydosaurus or any of the other Sate Leaders. Down with the NEG!

  4. Greg 2 years ago

    Thank you, Shane Rattenbury – you are doing the right thing! Good on you for standing up for what is right! Do not get bullied by the dinosaurs!!!!

  5. john 2 years ago

    I have just got down to this quote.

    {Roger Price, the CEO and chairman of Australian renewable energy company Windlab, was even more damning about the NEG, warning it would result in another investment freeze, like that which brought the industry to its knees during the Abbott years of the Coalition government.}

    And that does it for me.
    What happened then was a total stall in investment due to the IDIOT in charge.

    A company was building equipment for Wind Turbines but shut down thanks to the Idiot policy situation however the voters thought that was good.

    Do not be surprised if the same happens again.
    I would not be surprised if the exact same policies will be put in place by the next Government who will be the LNP.

  6. Gyrogordini 2 years ago

    Stay the course, ACT. If the gutless Labor States won’t support you, well shame on them. Closer to home, there is no hope that the hopeless NSW COALition will jack up – we need to move these has-beens on, and set a local, sensible decarbonisation plan in place, given the dereliction of the Federal gomint.

  7. Mike Westerman 2 years ago

    Email your pollie! You can be sure that if they are not flooded with emails, they won’t believe other than what the papers say.

Comments are closed.

Get up to 3 quotes from pre-vetted solar (and battery) installers.