Would Australia’s Future Fund really provide cheap finance to Carmichael coal?

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Could Australia’s sovereign wealth fund be the key source of finance that enables Adani’s Carmichael mega coal mine in the Galilee Basin?

share
Shuttershock
Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Shuttershock
Shuttershock

Could Australia’s sovereign wealth fund be the key source of finance that enables Adani’s Carmichael mega coal mine in the Galilee Basin? News has emerged that India’s Finance Minister, Arun Jaitley, will meet with Finance Minister Mathias Cormann and Chairman of the Future Fund, Peter Costello, on an Australian visit aimed at trying to secure subsidised government funding for Adani’s proposed coal mega-mine.

Having utterly failed to attract finance from the commercial banking sector for the initial A$10 billion required for the mine, rail and port project, Adani is now looking to its friends in the Indian and Australian government for a little sugar. The Abbott-Turnbull Government has remained staunch supporters of the Carmichael mine but, knowing how unpopular it is with the electorate, would want to find a way to finance it that flies under the radar. A direct handout in the form of a grant is too obvious, but the Future Fund presents several opportunities for a sly multi-billion dollar investment.

“How could the Future Fund finance the Adani Carmichael coal mine?” is a question worth asking from a moral and common sense perspective as much as anything else, but here we will take a look at the practical side of how the Future Fund could end up investing in Carmichael.

The Future Fund manages $120 billion of assets on behalf of the Australian Government. It is created similarly to many Australian superannuation funds, investing in Australian and international equities (shares), debt securities and cash, among other assets. A key point about the Future Fund is that it acts like a defined benefits fund, and its beneficiary is the Australian Government. Its mandate is therefore to deliver a certain return to the Government, which loses out if the Future Fund fails to deliverer necessary returns. As the Government uses returns from the Future Fund to support the pensions of public sector employees and enable “nation building” projects, we all lose out if the Future Fund fails to deliver returns.

Breaking down the components of the fund reveals an array of means by which Australia’s sovereign wealth fund could end up invested in the economic and environmental disaster-in-waiting that is the Carmichael coal mine.

Infrastructure

The mine, rail and port components of the Carmichael coal project are each estimated to cost several billion dollars. Funds often look to invest in infrastructure assets (roads, ports, rail) as they are normally considered to represent sound long-term investments. The Future Fund could become owner of the port or rail line, relieving Adani of the need to secure a partner or financier for that part of the project.

Private Equity

Let’s say that Adani decides to create a new, unlisted, special purpose vehicle for the Carmichael Coal project, or use one of its already unlisted companies as the vehicle to own and manage the Carmichael mine, rail and port project. The Future Fund could take a stake in that company, again investing potentially billions into the project by becoming a part-owner of it.

Debt securities

Should Adani find a bank to provide debt to the Carmichael project, the Future Fund could then buy that debt from the bank as a “fixed income” product. While none of these options listed here for investing in Carmichael make any financial sense, surely the Future Fund has noticed what has happened to bank debts to the resources sector lately. The thought that they would purchase debt used to finance a greenfield thermal coal export project that has been described as financially unviable by Macquarie Group while the likes of Goldman Sachs and Deutsche Bank are describing thermal coal as in structural decline would be criminally incompetent.

Back to the “how” question

From a practical perspective, the Future Fund could invest in Adani’s Carmichael project any number of ways. But going back to the common sense question: how could the Future Fund finance the Adani coal mine, when the private finance sector and even the Government owned State Bank of India considers it untouchable?

When there is a political imperative, rational economics and sound governance will be pushed to one side. The exceptionally high transportation costs mean that the mine would supply coal so expensive that its electricity would immediately cost more than wind and solar in India. Coal that would have to be sold at a loss and never generate a commercial return on the proposed A$10bn investment. And with rest of the world paring back its plans for new coal power leaving only Adani as a credible buyer for their own coal. Even the Future Fund’s Board of Guardians Statement of Investment Policies allows for investment exclusions based on, among other things:

Australia has ratified a number of international conventions and treaties that limit certain activities. Where the Board becomes aware that the activities of an entity or funding activity may contravene such a convention or treaty, the Board will consider the exclusion or removal of the investment from the portfolio generally having regard to the nature of the limitations. 

The legally binding Paris climate change agreement would surely mean investing in opening up one of the world’s largest untapped coal reserves would be out of bounds for the Future Fund.

But there is a political agenda at play, so it is entirely conceivable that the current Federal Government might make a massive gamble on the Carmichael mine – the largest carbon bubble under proposed development in the world at a time when we’re finally seeing serious climate change action taking hold around the world.

The question, though, is whether the bigger gamble would be financial or electoral. Because as we gear up for a Federal Election in the coming months, Australians could be asked to provide a major financial subsidy for a massive new coal mine owned by a foreign billionaire that would worsen global warming, deliver further harm to an already fragile Great Barrier Reef, tear up the lands of Traditional Owners who refuse to consent to the mine, and leave a multi-billion hole in our sovereign wealth fund.

That’s one hell of an election platform.

Julien Vincent is head of Market Forces, which  is encouraging Australians to contact the Future Fund and Finance Minister Mathias Cormann, to call for an exclusion of public finance for the Adani Carmichael coal project.

 

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

11 Comments
  1. suthnsun 4 years ago

    Every party should rule this out immediately.

    • Rob G 4 years ago

      Labor could gain ground by declaring that they will NOT support this and draw attention to yet more poor decision making by the gov – Question time would be the platform for it. Hammer Fredenberg and MT

  2. Keith 4 years ago

    This could be Turnbull’s attempt to outdo Tony Abbott in the crazy stakes. It could well lose him the election too.

  3. Stan Hlegeris 4 years ago

    “…the Future Fund…acts like a defined benefits fund…” No, it doesn’t. It’s just the opposite. The explanation is too long and would add nothing to the main point of this article.

    It would be a scandal if the Future Fund were to support Carmichael Coal in any way. This is something taxpayers should worry about, but it has nothing to do with the superannuation system.

  4. D. John Hunwick 4 years ago

    Now tell me how and who I can protest about all this? I refuse to stand by and do nothing about this eventuality. Can someone tell me what to do??

    • Ben 4 years ago

      Hi – great that you want to do something…there’s a petition going around from Market Forces about this – signing it is an easy way to do something: http://action.marketforces.org.au/page/speakout/no-future-fund-finance-for-carmichael?js=false
      or if you want to do something more there are organisations fighting fossil fuel developments. join up, donate, help out, get involved. 350.org and Market Forces are good ones. Change your super fund if it invests in fossil fuels ( I choose Future Super) and find a bank that doesn’t invest in FFs – Market Forces has all the info and can help ( I switched from CBA to Bendigo). Get twitter feeds and Facebook feeds from these orbs, and Getup and you’ll stay informed and hear about other ways to do something. Good luck! Ben, Hobart

  5. Rob G 4 years ago

    Should this government willingly use our money for this pointless venture all those involved should be sent to prison for a long, long time. After all this is a crime of the highest order.

  6. John Saint-Smith 4 years ago

    We must not let this pass. The only way to stop this madness – and its mad at every level – is to vote this suicidal bunch out after one disastrous term, and keep them out for the foreseeable future. (That is, if you want a future)

  7. JeffJL 4 years ago

    With Peabody likely to go into bankruptcy surly if they want to invest in FF assets it would be cheaper to buy in the coming fire sale.

  8. Chris Fraser 4 years ago

    The Future Fund should be chaired and directored by professional public servants with no political ties … who actually understand the global trend of investment.

  9. Radbug 4 years ago

    Sounds like something the Malaysian PM (see 4 Corners) would dream up. AND the Ganges has run dry, so right now, a West Bengal coal-fired power station has had to close down because of a lack of fresh water. Further, right now, Indian coal-fired power plants are grappling with huge stockpiles of coal. The most impactful consequence of Global Greenhouse is drought, and India depends on aquifers, so the rainfall to replenish those aquifers is falling away, as the rate of exploitation is rising. This Future Fund idea is total insanity.

Comments are closed.

Get up to 3 quotes from pre-vetted solar (and battery) installers.