Vic budget takes baby steps on environment – must do better | RenewEconomy

Vic budget takes baby steps on environment – must do better

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Andrews government’s first budget shows encouraging signs, but can it match the aspirations with funding and policy commitments?

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Today’s Victorian State budget is a modest step forward for the environment, however over the coming year the Andrews Government needs to develop a clear policy agenda on climate change and the environment and fund it properly in next year’s budget.

Today’s budget largely delivers on Labor’s pre-election environment and clean energy promises which were useful but unambitious.

However since being elected Andrews’ Government Ministers have said publicly and repeatedly that Victoria is prepared to lead on climate change, renewable energy and the environment again.

Current processes underway to develop a climate change action plan, and renewable energy and energy efficiency strategies for the state have all been supported in this budget with modest funding commitments, but will need serious investment in the coming year if they are to address the state’s environmental challenges.LABOR HEALTH CENTRE ANNOUNCEMENT MELBOURNE

Significant environmental commitments in the budget include:

– A $12m ‘Climate Change Action package’ which includes reviewing and strengthening the Climate Change Act and developing a Victorian Climate Change Action Plan;

– A $20m ‘New Energy’ fund to support renewable energy and energy storage projects;

– $1.9 m to improve energy efficiency and productivity including conducting a  review to strengthen and improve the Victorian Energy Efficiency Target;

– A very large investment in public transport including funding to begin the Melbourne Metro rail project;

– Significant spending of the Environmental Contribution Levy on water programs, including: $10m for riparian (river corridor) land protection; $3m to purchase 8 GL of environmental water for the Thomson River delivering a long-standing promise; $2.5m for the Gippsland Lakes; $1m for the Yarra River Protection Act; $6.8m to improve water quality; and $8m to better manage the climate change threats and impacts for freshwater ecosystems;

– $10 million to improve assets in National Parks and reserves.

Departmental spending on environmental protection has increased on previous years. Additionally the budget committed $30 million to implement the recommendations of the Hazelwood mine inquiry and improve coal mine regulation.

While the government’s commitment to implement all recommendations from the Hazelwood mine fire inquiry is welcome, it is alarming that this terrible event is costing Victorian taxpayers another $30 million. These costs should be recouped from the mine operators not the public.

This highlights yet again that Victoria desperately needs to develop a plan to clean up and modernise our outdated and polluting energy supply and retire our dirtiest power stations and coal mines.

This budget begins to spend the accumulated landfill levy and environmental contribution levy that all Victorians pay. However there remains a very large and growing bucket of funds that have been raised for environmental programs that are not being spent by the state government.

For example in the next year $174 million will be raised from Landfill levies which is required to be spent on environmental programs. There is no shortage of funds needed to deliver an ambitious climate and environment agenda, so now we need to see a clear plan of action to make Victoria an environmental leader.

In conclusion, after several very tough years for the environment in Victoria, with the previous government even banishing use of the words ‘climate change’, the Andrews government’s first budget shows some encouraging signs, but now it’s time to deliver for the environment and match the leadership aspirations with funding and policy commitments.

Mark Wakeham is CEO of Environment Victoria

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

  1. Ken Dyer 5 years ago

    Mornngton Peninsula Shire Council have a carbon neutral public comment paper out. They, and other councils need to lift their sights a bit to fund and promote a local government area version of a regional solar PV plant to benefit their ratepayers. There you go, Daniel, $20 million easily spent among the 79 Victorian councils for wind and solar. Absolute no brainer.

  2. Paul Turnbull 5 years ago

    I agree a positive and cautious start on climate change – I to would like to have seen more. Clear statements on gaining industry and community support for reducing emissions from electricity, gas and petrol…and farming and funding this rather than a bland sounding plan would be better. I love the Melb metro funding – but really without dealing with climate change it is a limited investment.

    Lets also imbed this thinking deeply – local government has done well – use the funding in industry development – if a business does not have plan to deal the impacts of dry, flooded and stormy future it gets no government money.

Comments are closed.

Get up to 3 quotes from pre-vetted solar (and battery) installers.