Scientists lambast The Australian for misleading article on deep ocean cooling | RenewEconomy

Scientists lambast The Australian for misleading article on deep ocean cooling

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The authors of research used by an article in The Australian on deep ocean cooling have taken the newspaper to task for its coverage of their work.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The Carbon Brief

the ausAn article in Friday’s The Australian suggested brand new research by two eminent oceanographers casts doubt on scientific understanding of global warming. But the authors of the research have taken the newspaper to task for its coverage of their work.

The research by Carl Wunsch from Harvard University and Patrick Heimbach from MIT found temperatures seem to be falling in parts of the very deep ocean, known as ‘the abyss’.

In a piece headline headlined “Puzzle of deep ocean cooling”, journalist Graham Lloyd of the Australian interpreted the new research for readers:

“The deep oceans have been cooling for the past two decades and [so] it is not possible to say whether changes in ocean heat adequately explain the “pause” in global warming”.

But the authors think Lloyd’s article is misleading. In an letter to the editor in today’s edition of the Australian, they say:

“The article by Graham Lloyd will likely leave a mis-impression with many of your readers concerning the substance of our paper.”

Wunsch tells us Lloyd’s article “cherrypicks” statements from their paper and “misses some key points”.

Graham Lloyd
The Australian 25th July 2014

Overall, the oceans are warming

The new research, just published in the Journal of Physical Oceanography, explains how measurements in recent decades suggest some parts of the very deep ocean – the ‘abyss’ – are cooling slightly. The paper says:

“[Our findings show] warming in the abyss at high southern latitudes, in the western basin of the Atlantic and with cooling elsewhere.”

At depths of thousands of meters, taking the temperature of the deep ocean is very challenging. Quite a lot of the discussion in the paper is about the limits of current measurements.

Though the research suggests some parts of the very deep ocean are cooling, not all of it is. Scientists can detect a weak cooling signal overall, but other parts are showing strong warming.

This wasn’t explained by The Australian, say the authors. Wunsch tell us:

“If the opening sentence in the Australian had said ‘Parts of the deep ocean have been cooling for the past two decades’ there would have been no quarrel with that statement.”

Wunsch and Heimbach’s research is very clear on an important point – that overall, the planet’s oceans are warming. The letter to the editor says:

“We never assert that global warming and warming of the oceans are not occurring – we do find an ocean warming, particularly in the upper regions.”

The point the new paper makes is the oceans aren’t a solid lump. Knowing how different parts of the oceans behave is important. Though new technology is making it easier, the deepest and most remote parts of the ocean are still poorly understood. Wunsch tells us:

“[The oceans are] a very noisy system, with parts warming and parts cooling, it looks like a net warming is taking place, but exactly by how much is at the very edge of the science.”

Not a reason to doubt scientists explanations of the “pause”

Lloyd argues that parts of the deep ocean cooling contradicts other scientists’ explanations of the so-called “pause” in surface warming.

The “pause” describes the fact that temperatures at earth’s surface have risen more slowly in the last 15 years than in previous decades, despite greenhouse gas emissions continuing to rise.

Scientists say periods of slower and faster warming aren’t unusual and the most likely explanation is that heat is making its way to the deep ocean rather than staying at the surface.

The Australian gives the impression Wunsch and Heimbach disagree with this explanation. It says their study suggests “much less heat is being added to the oceans than has been claimed in previous studies”.

But that’s not the case, say the authors. Wunsch tells us the overall warming of the ocean they report is consistent with other scientific literature – a point they also make in the paper.

An article by Christopher Booker in Saturday’s Telegraph also argues the new research contradicts other scientists.

US climate professor Kevin Trenberth first described the slower-than-expected surface warming as the “missing heat” problem, and has been prominent in research pointing to faster warming in the deep ocean as a likely explanation.

Describing Trenberth as “one of the UN’s top climate alarmists”,  Booker claims Wunsch’s new paper suggests “the warmists have no real evidence to support their claim other than computer modelling”. He says:

“Now magisterial cold water has been poured on this theory by none other than Prof Carl Wunsch, probably the world’s most respected oceanographer.”

But Wunsch’s letter to the editor makes clear his findings are of little consequence for global warming or the so-called “pause”. The letter says:

“Contrary to the implications of Lloyd’s article, parts of the deep ocean are warming, parts are cooling, and although the global abyssal average is negative, the value is tiny in a global warming context.”

A quote from Dr Andy Hogg of Australia’s National University at the end of the Australian article explains parts of the very deep ocean can take a very long time (centuries to millennia) to respond to what’s happening at the surface.

Hogg adds:

“So if cooling has occurred over large parts of the abyssal ocean, it is unrelated to global warming of the atmosphere over the last century.”

Hogg adds that while there is still some uncertainty about temperatures in the deep ocean, shallower regions are well understood and Wunsch’s findings are “consistent” with warming oceans.

Wunsch told us he thought Hogg’s comments were “on the mark,” and that it was a shame that they are “hidden at the end” of the article.

Source: Carbon Brief. Reproduced with permission.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

  1. Colin Nicholson 6 years ago

    How do you tell a dimwit in Australia? He subscribes to the Oz

  2. John McKeon 6 years ago

    So, a journalist at The Australian, and the relevant editors, have twisted yet another science story to suite their prejudices and agendas. So, what else is new? Any news?

  3. david_fta 6 years ago

    Is self-defence a defence against a charge of patricide?

    Doe Mr Lloyd have any children?

  4. Tim Nicholas 6 years ago

    And to think The Oz told ABCs Media Watch that they ‘truly ruly’ tell the truth about world events….see my tweet with their words from 29/7/14 episode

  5. Megs 6 years ago

    Thats the last copy of The Australian I buy. One rotten Apple indictes the state of the whole barrel. No editorial integrity means nothing you read in that paper can be taken as reliable. I have google and I have a tertiary education so goodbye The Australian

  6. MrMauricio 6 years ago

    This is classic denier operating procedure-wilfully mislead,cherry pick and confuse.Read “Merchants of Doubt”E.M Conway

  7. ac baird 6 years ago

    Not that long ago a letter to the editor at the Oz complained about the various doings of two ALP identities plus John Howard. It was published with one person missing! Guess who? Laugh! That’s putting your prejudices on display to screamingly funny level of ineptitude! And there are STILL people who say it’s a quality paper AND KEEP A STRAIGHT FACE. Anybody with a handle on “fair and balanced” would immediately corpse helplessly.

  8. Rob G 6 years ago

    I grew tired a long time ago of the news according to Rupert M – another fictional work that makes for better reading is ‘Alice in wonderland’

Comments are closed.

Get up to 3 quotes from pre-vetted solar (and battery) installers.