Know your NEM: Renewable energy certificates in free-fall

Figure 11: Baseload futures financial year time weighted average

Summary

The long dormant LGC market finally woke up, to find itself in free fall  in what was otherwise a quiet week. According to Mercari, the source of our week LGC price data, FY19 futures fell 27% in just one week to $52 from the prior week’s $70.

The LGC market is notoriously thin and we certainly don’t think the posted prices are anything more than indicative. That said, they are the market indication. This calendar year the FY19 price has dropped from the mid $80s to $52  and may well go lower.

Figure 1 Cal 19 LGC prices. Source: Mercari
Figure 1: Cal 19 LGC prices. Source: Mercari

Although around 4.4 GW of new and just completed build is underway on ITK numbers we estimate at least 0.6 GW is voluntary surrender and won’t count towards the RET.

The Clean Energy Regulator earlier this month stated that around 4GW of new projects in FY17 and FY18 were required to meet the target. I haven’t done the numbers to work out how much of the 4.4 GW of commited new supply was actually committed in 2016.

However, we think it’s now a very arguable position that the target will be met. It may even be exceeded.

Readers may like to contemplate what will happen to the price of certificates if the target is exceeded. Rationally, it could drop towards zero. The only reason it would be above zero is if buyers believed there would be a new or larger scheme. So those players exposed to the spot market without a long term contract might well be keeping a close eye on these prices.

This emphasises our firmly held view that the RET is a bad way to procure renewable energy. Reverse auctions providing certainty to buyer and seller will produce lower overall costs, steadier new production and enable participants to more reasonably plan their future.

Policy Development

  • Federal Court judgement on NSW distributors: We have that news now.
  • Release of the Finkel Report: This is expected in June. It’s a major input into the policy framework Australia will take towards its international commitments
  • Release of the Final version of the Mugglestone Report in Qld. Why is the QLD Govt. sitting on this? Is it different to the draft report? We’d like to see this report. It’s fairly important to many in the electricity industry
  • Release of draft legislation for the Victorian Renewable Energy Target. This legislation is due shortly and has assumed new importance from an energy security point of view post Hazelwood.
  • NSW Renewable Energy Target development. We will have more to say on this down the track.

Turning to the weekly action

  • Volumes: In the week to May 26 were down and are flat for the year. Warmer weather in Victoria contributed to softer volumes there. QLD continued its recent relative softness.
  • Future prices Continue the recent decline
  • Spot electricity prices Were lower this week than last though still well above last year. In recent weeks prices in NSW and QLD have been markedly lower than those in Victoria and South Australia.
  • REC see discussion above.
  • Gas prices . drifted up although we remain in shoulder season. Prices in QLD were noticeably softer than in the Southern States.
  • Utility share prices were largely unchanged. ORE was the best performer although this is only a partial recovery from its March Quarter dissappointments. ORG has been stronger than AGL recently as the market takes a more optimistic view of the oil price and ORG’s balance sheet.
Figure 2: Summary
Figure 2: Summary

Share Prices

Figure 3: Selected utility share prices
Figure 3: Selected utility share prices

Volumes

Figure 4: Weekly and monthly share price performance
Figure 4: Weekly and monthly share price performance

 

Figure 5: electricity volumes
Figure 5: electricity volumes

 

Figure 6 7 Day moving avg year on year temp change. Source: BOM
Figure 6: Seven Day moving avg year on year temp change. Source: BOM

Base Load Futures

rsz_screen_shot_2017-05-29_at_14140_pm

Figure 11: Baseload futures financial year time weighted average
Figure 11: Baseload futures financial year time weighted average

Gas Prices

Figure 12: STTM gas prices
Figure 12: STTM gas prices

 

Figure 13 30 day moving average of Adelaide, Brisbane, Sydney STTM price. Source: AEMO
Figure 13 30 day moving average of Adelaide, Brisbane, Sydney STTM price. Source: AEMO

David Leitch is principal of ITK. He was formerly a Utility Analyst for leading investment banks over the past 30 years. The views expressed are his own. Please note our new section, Energy Markets, which will include analysis from Leitch on the energy markets and broader energy issues. And also note our live generation widget, and the APVI solar contribution.

 

David Leitch is a regular contributor to Renew Economy and co-host of the weekly Energy Insiders Podcast. He is principal at ITK, specialising in analysis of electricity, gas and decarbonisation drawn from 33 years experience in stockbroking research & analysis for UBS, JPMorgan and predecessor firms.

Comments

6 responses to “Know your NEM: Renewable energy certificates in free-fall”

  1. BrisAnalyst Avatar
    BrisAnalyst

    This article isn’t the first time I’ve heard this concept, but I’m confused by the idea that LGC prices could go to zero. Does that assume that all parties with a surrender obligation have contracted their LGC supply? Surely there will be some parties that will have to transact in the spot market to meet their obligations right through to 2030?

    1. Andy Saunders Avatar
      Andy Saunders

      I think he means that if there is a surplus (and the RET isn’t extended or increased) then there is an oversupply of LGCs that simply can’t be used, hence the price should logically drop to zero.

      If there is an undersupply, then the price should go sky-high, except that it is effectively capped by the tax-adjusted penalty cost.

      Which goes to his point that it is a relatively poor way to run a scheme.

  2. wmh Avatar
    wmh

    I am sick of hearing about all these bullshit renewable energy trading schemes that the government dreams up. I will soon be producing more than 95% of my energy needs from PV, including winter heating and summer cooling energy, and if the energy companies can’t supply during the half dozen or so wet cold winter days when I need the grid then I will just have to put on another jumper and cook on the bbq.

  3. Bradley Smith Avatar
    Bradley Smith

    “NSW Renewable Energy Target development. We will have more to say on this down the track.”
    What’s this!? I’ve read their plans to contract 540 MW, but are you referring to something new David?

  4. Just_Chris Avatar
    Just_Chris

    Is there a source that tells me how much water we have in storage and how much gas we have in storage? I think hydro-electric and gas are going to be the keys to the Australian energy market over the next 5-10 years. If we are short of either we are going to be in trouble. I am sure water is fine at the moment but as we approach that winter gas peak are we going to see electricity price spikes as the gas generators are reluctant to turn on?

  5. Mike Shackleton Avatar
    Mike Shackleton

    The RECs had their purpose when renewable electricity was more expensive than conventional sources, I for one have purchased REC backed electricity for the KWhs I draw from the grid when the solar panels aren’t working, even though I could argue that my panels export as much as I consume off the grid.

    Now new Wind and Solar are coming in at 5 – 6 cents/kWh and dropping, they can compete on their own cost basis. No additional financial incentive is required.

    I’ll probably stop buying REC back electricity this year as their purpose has been fulfilled.

Get up to 3 quotes from pre-vetted solar (and battery) installers.