How rooftop solar eased peak demand during S.A. summer heatwave | RenewEconomy

How rooftop solar eased peak demand during S.A. summer heatwave

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Rooftop solar played an important role in reducing peak demand during the recent heat waves, but there should be more emphasis on energy efficiency and west-facing solar systems.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In the year to December 2015, electricity demand increased in the NEM as a whole and in every individual state, and also in WA for the year to November 2015 (Figures 3 and 4), the first time such a conjunction of demand increases has been seen since 2010.

Queensland led the way as it has for some months.  With all three LNG plants now operational, steady demand growth should continue in that state for several years.

The very sharp increase in relative demand in SA in December provides a particularly striking illustration of the effect of demand for air conditioning and refrigeration on electricity demand in that state.

In the month as a whole, total demand for electricity (excluding supply from rooftop PV) was 20% higher than in the whole of December 2014.

There were two heatwaves in SA during December 2015.  The first, running from 4 to 7 December saw maximum temperatures in Adelaide over 30 degrees on 4 and 7 December and over 40 degrees on 5 and 6 December.

The second heatwave ran for seven days, from Sunday 13 December to Saturday 19 December.  The maximum temperature in Adelaide was above 30 degrees on the first day, above 35 degrees on the next two days, and above 40 degrees on the remaining four days.  By contrast, in December 2014 there were no heatwaves, and only two days with maximum temperatures above 35 degrees.

Comparing SA region electricity demand over this period with the corresponding period in 2014 (Sunday 14 December to Saturday 20 December) shows the massive effect of higher temperature on demand for electricity, in terms of both total daily energy demand and daily peak demand (Figure 5).


On the Wednesday, Thursday and Friday of the week, maximum temperatures were above 40 degrees in 2015 but below 25 degrees in 2014.  On the Saturday the maximum rose to 30.3 degrees in 2014, while it was 43.2 degrees in 2015.  It can be seen that maximum temperatures above 40 degrees almost double peak system demand in SA, compared with days having maxima below 25 degrees.

Moreover, the heatwave conditions resulted in total electrical energy consumption over the four hottest days (Wednesday to Saturday) which was 69% higher than over the corresponding four days in 2014. Note that on the last day in the graph (Sunday 20th in 2015 and 21st in 2014), the maximum temperature in Adelaide was 23.5 degrees in 2015, but 36.1 degrees in 2014 (the hottest day in the whole month).

The data graphed in Figure 5 exclude the contribution of rooftop PV to total demand for electricity in SA.  Data provided for CEDEX® by the Australian Photovoltaic Institute (APVI) indicate that on the hottest day (Thursday 17 December), maximum demand including rooftop PV occurred at 16.00 local time (16.30 NEM time), at which time PV contributed 10.5% of the total.  System peak, i.e. excluding the contribution of rooftop PV, occurred over two hours later, at 18.15 local time; PV was still contributing 5.0% of total demand at this time.

However, the difference between maximum demand, including the PV contribution, at 16.00 and system peak, excluding PV, at 18.15, is the more appropriate measure of the contribution of rooftop PV to peak demand, and this is 6.5%.  In other words, rooftop PV reduced peak demand in the SA region by 6.5% below what it would have been in the absence of PV.

This has obvious implications for demands placed on the generation and transmission system on heatwave days. It is relevant to note that the contribution of PV at this time of the year, almost precisely coinciding with the summer solstice, is larger than it would be during a heatwave occurring in late summer.

Taken together, these observations suggest that, as others have pointed out, providing incentives for rooftop PV to be installed with a more westerly orientation may provide economic benefits to the electricity system as a whole.

System electrical energy over the whole of the four days, Wednesday to Saturday, with maximum temperatures above 40 degrees, was supplied from the following sources:  gas 46%, local coal 21%, wind 19%, imports from Victoria 14%.

The high demand during the hot daylight hours was mainly supplied by AGL’s ageing Torrens Island A and B gas burning steam power stations.  Significantly, AGL announced just over a year ago that it would mothball the 480 MW Torrens Island A station, but keep the 800 MW Torrens Island B station in operation.

In mid-2015, Alinta, the owner of the 530 MW Northern power station, SA’s only coal fired station, that it would close the station, and its associated coal mine by early 2018.

Rooftop PV also made a useful contribution to total energy, in addition to its contribution to lessening peak demand.  APVI data show that energy consumption over the four hottest days was 5.4% higher than system consumption over this period.  When the contribution of rooftop PV is included, the shares of the various supply sources become: gas 43.2%, local coal 20.2%, wind 18.5%, imports 12.8%, and rooftop solar 5.1%.

It is interesting to note in Figure 5 that the effect of rooftop PV in reducing system demand during the middle of the day can be clearly seen in the 2014 data, whereas in 2015 this effect is apparently swamped by the surging demand for cooling. (The small demand spikes occurring at midnight on every day are caused by the simultaneous switching on of off-peak electric water heaters.)

It is hard to avoid the conclusion that the enormous increase in electrical energy consumption on very hot days could be reduced, with considerable economic benefits, by improved energy use efficiency.

Specifically, improving the design, construction and operation of both commercial and residential buildings, air conditioning and refrigeration systems should be a priority of the recently announced National Energy Productivity Plan.  Also as noted, continued or enhanced support for solar energy installations, including those with more westerly orientations, would further reduce system costs.

Hugh Saddler is a senior energy analyst with Pitt & Sherry.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

  1. Ray Miller 4 years ago

    Thanks Hugh great analysis, two points, I agree that a greater western collection by PV would make a lot of sense with the advent of many PV inverters having two separate MPPT inputs it is a logical progression to have two arrays one to the west and the other north, and I would further add that the PV rating should be >100% of the inverters (even if the inverter size is reduced) to give a Grid export power level which is more consistent and has reduced variability while still maintaining the bankable value to the owner. Very simple solutions a little to no cost but the overall system benefits (which should be reflected in the price which is paid to the owners).

    The other point is with building regulation; it is very long overdue that the energy star ratings were just increased to closer to 10 stars (with no cheating like Queensland) and proper verification of performance of the completed constructions. I find it hard to reconcile the $80 odd million spent on the royal commission into trade unions when a combination of gross professional incompetence by practitioners and corruption exists in the non union sectors of the building industry throughout the country. It has been over 12 months since Pitt and Sherry’s report has been released in to the non delivery of thermal performance (of even a very low thermal performance bar) housing stock and nothing has changed.

    • Ian 4 years ago

      Furiously agree with your point about the $80M wasted while builders trades deliver shonky building thermal performance and continue to get away with it

  2. David Osmond 4 years ago

    Excellent analysis Hugh. One point about sunset times. It is worth noting that the time of sunset in Adelaide in mid Dec is almost exactly the same as the time of sunset on Feb 1.

    It is towards the end of the first week of Jan that the sun-set is latest in Adelaide, rather than on the solstice.

    Thus late summer heatwaves may see similar PV generation profiles to early summer heatwaves.

    • JeffJL 4 years ago

      Very good point David. Not one which I have thought about before and I will definitely be using it in the future.

  3. Ken Dyer 4 years ago

    It is acknowledged that solar did provide relief over 4 days during a heat wave, but this article would better serve if it also included the percentages of the other 361 days of the year. In short, the graphs represent only a very short time frame, and an extreme weather event; it is not representative.

    • JeffJL 4 years ago

      Hmmm. Article headline –

      ‘How rooftop solar eased peak demand during S.A. summer heatwave’

      I think the use of the graph (which by the way covers eight days) is 100% relevant. Providing information on the other days of the year are not relevant to the thrust of the argument and would only confuse the issue. Quite often when you see articles with information which is accurate but not relevant they are trying to blind you with science and put doubt in peoples minds.

      “Doubt is our product”

Comments are closed.

Get up to 3 quotes from pre-vetted solar (and battery) installers.