Goulburn Council floats solar PV as a way to cut water costs | RenewEconomy

Goulburn Council floats solar PV as a way to cut water costs

Goulburn Council to commission feasibility studies into installing floating solar on government water stores, to slash power costs.


One Step Off The Grid


Another local government in regional Australia is weighing up the benefits of installing floating solar PV arrays on council owned water stores and waste treatment plants, to reduce its carbon footprint and offset rising power costs.

The Goulburn Post reports this week that the Goulburn Mulwaree Council planned to call for expressions of interest before Christmas for feasibility studies into both solar and bio-gas generation projects on council land and assets, including its water stores.

The council – which last financial year spent $1.55 million on electricity, much of it to power water and sewer infrastructure and street lights – is also working to cut its greenhouse gas emission by 30 per cent by 2020 based on 2005/06 levels, as part of its sustainability action plan.

Council has already installed solar panels on several council buildings, the paper said, and at its most recent meeting, agreed to install a 45kW system at a government storage depot.

Bio-gas generation is planned for the new $30 million wastewater treatment plant, which currently under construction.

In terms of floating solar, Council general manager Warwick Bennett said the council would start with the Marulan water treatment plant, due to its storage dam being comparatively close to the water treatment plant.

Bennett said the council was also looking at installing a solar farm on spare land surrounding the wastewater treatment plant, that would be freed up after the plant becomes operational.

“It (the plant) will be a much larger user of electricity and we are looking at solar to offset that. There is opportunity for a 700 to 800 acre solar farm there,” he said.

The idea of installation solar and wind farms at, or on, council-owned dams and water treatment facilities has been gaining popularity around the country, particularly among local government groups who often own the energy hungry utilities.

In April this year, Queensland’s Gold Coast Council proposed the installation of a series of floating solar PV arrays on its network of wastewater ponds both to help power the city’s wastewater treatment plants – cutting council operating costs – while also cutting evaporation from the ponds.

And in South Australia, the state’s largest water and sewerage services supplier, SA Water Corporation, announced plans to commission a commercial-scale solar and storage system at its Crystal Brook Workshop site.

In a Request for Tender launched in July, the company – which manages more than 27,000km of water mains, including 9,266 km in the Adelaide metropolitan area – said it was seeking to build a grid-connected, rooftop solar PV system of more than 100kW, along with a 50kWh battery storage system and “smart controls,” to manage periods of high electricity prices and ensure safe and sustainable delivery of water to customers.

Meanwhile, in Goulburn, plans are also underway to develop a 1MW community-owned solar farm, led by Community Energy 4 Goulburn in collaboration with local business Divall’s Haulage – owner of the land the solar farm is slated to be built – and Infigen Energy.

This article was originally published on RenewEconomy’s sister site, One Step Off The Grid, which focuses on customer experience with distributed generation. To sign up to One Step’s free weekly newsletter, please click here.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

  1. Brunel 3 years ago

    Floating solar must be pretty expensive like solar roadways compared to ground based solar.

    • George Michaelson 3 years ago

      They have the water surface. so there is no land acquisition cost. they get marginal benefit from reduction in evaporative losses. Its a model which other water-asset owners are exploring worldwide. I would think that this has been worked out: its not a high margin space, if they decided to do this, it must have a pretty solid upside

      • Brunel 3 years ago

        People said the same thing about Masters Hardware and Tata Nano.

        Both turned out to be absolute disasters.

        Land is dirt cheap in the desert and it is quite sunny too.

      • Ren Stimpy 3 years ago

        Most of the power is utilised on-site to process the waste water. Excess solar power can be exported to local towns/cities using the high capacity existing grid connection to the site. The water cools the solar panels on hot days increasing their generation capacity factor. So many synergies there. The only downside is for the poor bugger who has to go out onto the array to clean them in long spells without rain. Peg on nose stuff.

  2. Andrew Woodroffe 3 years ago

    Floating means about 100 tonnes of steel I beams per MW are not required for mounting frames. Nor the specialized piling kit required to ram them into the ground. Reduces evaperation losses, too.

    • Ren Stimpy 3 years ago

      The circular frame housing the array requires minimal effort to be rotated throughout the day (because it floats) so that the panels can track the sun without requiring an overly mechanical or energy-consuming tracking mechanism.

Comments are closed.

Get up to 3 quotes from pre-vetted solar (and battery) installers.