From sugar to solar: Qld council to build 10MW solar farm | RenewEconomy

From sugar to solar: Qld council to build 10MW solar farm

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The Sunshine Coast council is set to become the first in Australia to build a utility-scale solar farm, transforming 20 hectares of a former sugar cane plantation near Coolum into a 10MW solar PV plant that would generate enough power to meet half the council’s electricity needs for the next 30 years, and slash its energy costs.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The Sunshine Coast council is set to become the first in Australia to build a utility-scale solar farm, transforming 20 hectares of a former sugar cane plantation near Coolum in Queensland into a solar PV power plant that would generate enough energy to meet half the council’s electricity needs for the next 30 years.

The proposed Valdora Solar Farm would be one Australia’s largest – the site, which was identified as an ideal location back in 2011, has planning approval for a 10MW facility, which would make it the same size as Australia’s current largest operating solar power plant, the Greenough River Solar Farm in WA.

The project will begin construction in 2014. It could become the first utility-scale solar farm to be built on Australia’s eastern seaboard, if it is complete before the 20MW project to be built in the ACT under the territory’s solar auction program.

Sunshine Coast Mayor Mark Jamieson says the council hoped to get the $24-$30 million project under way within the next few weeks, adding that once the solar farm was operational, it would feed electricity back into the grid, save money on energy bills, and shrink the region’s carbon footprint.

“If our market-sounding exercises stack up, we would be the first council to build a solar farm at utility scale in Australia, and it will be potentially the largest in the nation,” Jamieson said. “This would save money, reduce our carbon footprint and take the Sunshine Coast one step closer to becoming the most sustainable region in Australia.”

The council will, this Saturday, issue a call for Expressions of Interest to design and build the solar farm  – the project is expected to generate around 40 jobs during construction. This will be used to confirm the cost and benefit estimates.

The council will finance the project itself, because it can access reasonably cheap funds through Queensland Treasury. It will not need a power purchase agreement, because it is the major customer. Many in the solar industry believe this could be a model for the development of solar in this country, given the reluctance of most major utilities to contract to build solar installations.

And while the council is yet to finalise due diligence on the project, the Mayor is confident it will go ahead without a hitch. Jamieson says the scheme is expected to provide a net saving to ratepayers of $10 million over 30 years, while also generating $10 million for the local economy over the next 10 years.

Sunshine Coast Councillor for New and Emerging Industries Stephen Robinson says even more money would be saved if the project life and output were greater than the initial conservative estimates.

“Council would also be well placed to leverage investment in the solar farm project by continuing to develop the ‘clean-tech’ industry hub on the Sunshine Coast,” Robinson said.

“The region would be able to export the skills developed during construction to similar projects within and outside Queensland – further diversifying our economy. “The environmental benefits would be substantial as council’s greenhouse gas emissions from our electricity usage would be expected to drop by about 50%.”

The seed for the council’s ambitious solar plans was planted back in 2010, with the endorsement of its Energy Transition Plan, which set a goal for the Sunshine Coast to become a low-carbon economy, generating 40MW of power from sustainable sources by 2015 and 100MW by 2020.

Back then, Energy Parks Australia worked with the council on plans to build a utility-scale solar farm,  identifying the 50 hectares of unused cane land at Valdora as an ideal site and winning planning approval for a 10MW plant to be built there. At the time, the EPA mooted plans to build a $40 million 50,000-panel solar plant covering about 20 hectares of the site, with the balance to be used for agriculture or bio-fuel production.

Two years later, the estimated upper cost for the project has dropped by $10 million; which goes some way to explaining why the council has now decided to proceed with the project. The council says that falling solar panel prices have helped make this the right time to invest, along with the lure of “first mover advantage,” and the fact that energy contract re-negotiation with current retailers is due in 2014.

The council says it has had the full support of Energex for the project so far, with the state government-owned utility’s staff and technical experts involved in discussions on the project for some time now, and set to continue working with the council during the phases ahead.

“The Valdora project represents another step in the ongoing collaboration between the Sunshine Coast Council and Energex regarding local electricity supplies and peak demand management,” Energex CEO Terry Effeny said.

As part of the council’s 2010 Energy Transition Plan, it sought to establish an Energy Demand Management Region of 6,000 dwellings which would allow Energex to control 6MW load during peak demand periods by 2015, and then expand that to 10,000 dwellings (control of 10MW) by 2020. Two years ahead of time, Energex already has 7,000 homes in its peak program. It is believed that the success of this initiative has encouraged Energex to embrace the solar park plan.

And that’s not the only energy target the Sunshine Coast is way ahead on. The region has 30,000 houses with solar PV on them – close to 90MW in total – bringing it close to meeting its 2020 renewables goal of 100MW more than six years early.

The council says the size and scale of the Valdora solar project will help leverage investment in this and other such projects, by continuing to develop a “cleantech industry hub” on the Sunshine Coast, making the region an exponent and exporter of skills for similar projects within and outside Queensland – and thus further diversifying the local economy.

Australian Solar Energy Council John Grimes agrees, describing the project as a “fantastic initiative.”

“What they’ve figured out is that by building their own solar power plant in south-eastern Queensland, which has some of the best solar resource in the world, they can slash their pollution, they can slash their power bills, they can create employment and a new industry in the region and they can save money on their electricity bills all at the same time,” he said.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

  1. James Fisher 7 years ago

    The cost of financing Solar PV, Wind and Solar Thermal is the main component of the LCOE. If debt is free or close to it the LCOE will be very low as annual operating costs are minimal. If local, state and federal governments decided to take advantage of their ability to raise low cost debt to build renewable energy it would lead to very cheap renewable energy!

    • Ronald Brakels 7 years ago

      This is an intereting project. I’m not sure why they aren’t instead installing the PV capacity on school roofs, council buildings, and any housing commission homes they may have in order to save on the retail cost of electricity, as that’s about 5 times higher than the wholesale price.

      • Dylan Tusler 7 years ago

        I’ve seen a presentation on this. Large council facilities (office buildings, for instance) already receive very preferential retail rates for their electricity, making it not worth the investment. Many other smaller facilities do already have solar panels on them, the largest of which is the 30kW system on the Stockland Park Stadium.

        The council does not have access to school roofs or housing commission homes. However, they do have access to over 1000 other structures, and proposals have been put forward for many of them.

        • Ronald Brakels 7 years ago

          While the commercial rates for electricity are considerably lower than residential rates, they are still a lot better than wholesale electricity rates, so I still don’t see why grid solar would be a better option. Particularly since in Australia small rooftop installations appear to be the cheapest solar per watt we currently have. I would guess that the logical thing to do would be to support local residents in installing their own solar power systems. That might be the most cost effective method for the council to reduce CO2 emissions from power generation the local area is responsible for.

          • Dylan Tusler 7 years ago

            There has been a lot of cost modelling done on the feasibility of PV in a variety of situations. The council is not engaging in an “eggs-in-one-basket” approach on this and takes each project on its individual merit. Even the Valdora project, you might notice, is hedged around in press releases with some escape clauses if the “market sounding” doesn’t work out.

            Disclaimer: I work at the council, but not in this area.

          • Ronald Brakels 7 years ago

            Thanks for your input. I appreciate that what might appear cheapest to me overall isn’t necesarily possible for a council to do as it has to deal with various real world legal and practical matters.

  2. Peter Fries 7 years ago

    This looks like a good project, until you consider that the project is to be on flood prone land. Infrastructure will have to be on supports that are at least 2 m off the ground. In 1988, people where crossing that spot in boats after a cyclone dumped 1 m of rain in 50 hours. There is of course a lot of space on the Sunshine coast for such PV development that isn’t flood prone – commercial and industrial rooftops.

    • sean 7 years ago

      this irritates me… surely there are community centers/town halls/sports clubs/ that they could use.

      it makes sense that they put cane there, flood plains are great for agriculture

      • maddachsy 7 years ago

        they could but the PV panels create a glare that is not only annoying to surrounding residents that live there day to day but the glare can create a danger to the motorists as they cannot see. and then depending on the system they use and type of PV panels they use it can turn into a giant “magnifying glass” creating not only a fire danger but again an annoyance for the motorists.

  3. MoreBikesPlease 7 years ago

    If they’re feeding into the grid they’ll need an agreement with their distributor at least. How do they achieve a financial return – credits against the council’s electricity bill? What sort of deal would they get?

Comments are closed.

Get up to 3 quotes from pre-vetted solar (and battery) installers.