Citigroup: How solar module prices could fall to 25c/watt | RenewEconomy

Citigroup: How solar module prices could fall to 25c/watt

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Citigroup says solar PV modules could fall to as low a 25c/Watt by 2020 – suggesting that the recent cost reductions could continue for the rest of the decade. That would make rooftop solar cheaper than grid-sourced power even in the UK as early as 2018, and cheaper than gas-fired generation in all key markets in the world by 2020.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Energy analysts at global investment bank Citigroup suggest that the cost of solar PV modules could fall beyond most expectations in coming years – and reach a cost of just 25c a watt by 2020.

The prediction is included in an analysis of the market forces that are likely to shape the world’s energy future in the coming year. We reported on the major part of that report last Thursday, but Citi’s estimates on the cost of solar PV are intriguing, because they are well below most forecasts.

The rate of decline in the cost of solar PV in recent years has confounded most experts, even the optimists within the solar industry itself, and it has certainly taken the conventional power industry completely by surprise.

Yet there is still great divergence of opinion about what the future holds, and what the anticipated rationalisation among solar module manufacturers might mean.

The US Department of Energy, for instance, says its Solar Sunshot program aims to get the cost of solar PV down to $1/watt by 2020 (50c/W for the modules, the rest in balance of systems costs) – a situation that would deliver energy at a levellised cost of around $60/MWh, making it cheaper than new coal and gas-fired generation.

Bloomberg New Energy Finance makes a similar forecast. Greentech Media recently lowered its forecast for solar modules to 42c/W by 2015. On the other hand, Australia’s official government forecaster, The Bureau of Resource and Energy Economics, suggests that the starting point is higher than most current estimates, and predicts solar PV will not fall much below $140/MWh by 2020, and then make little progress over the following decade.

Citigroup’s report paints a very different picture in the two scenarios painted by the Citi team led by Jason Channell.

The first scenario, dubbed “single speed” expands on recent experience, which shows that the cost of solar PV has fallen around 22 per cent for each doubling in installed capacity. This is a variation of Moore’s Law, which held that there is a doubling of chip performance in computer hardware every 18 months.

Based on a continuation of that trend, and forecasts of solar PV capacity rising from around 100GW now to 500GW by 2020, Citi’s predictions fall in line with the market average, with a module cost of around 53c/Watt.  Citigroup says any variations would be dictated by short term supply or demand effects.

But, in its “three speed” scenario, Citi works on the assumption that the cost of solar PV modules has evolved through three phases. The first was the ‘experimental’ phase, prior to 1988;  the second was the ‘industry-development’ phase between 1998 and 2008; and the third was the ‘mass-production’ phase, after 2008.

Citi says that in this scenario a different ‘experience curve’ drives each phase of development, and extrapolating the curve of the mass-production phase delivers a markedly different outcome by 2020. It expects this third phase will set the speed for cost reductions in the future.

Modules are not the only major cost. “Balance of system” costs – which include such things as inverters, mounting systems, installation costs and planning approvals. It once accounted for just 30 per cent of total costs, but BoS is now up to around 50 per cent, thanks to the plunge in the price of modules, and in the USA it accounts for three quarters of the installation costs, thanks to a complicated approvals process and other red tape.

As the graph below shows, the Citi analysis suggest that ratio could stay, at least in the US. It expects total costs of residential-scale installations at $1.40/watt in its single speed scenario, and at $1.12/watt in the three speed scenario by 2020. That compares to around $2.40/watt today.

For utility-scale installations, Citi sees the corresponding costs at $0.93/watt for the single speed scenario and $0.65/watt in 2020 in the three-speed scenario, with module costs at 25c/W – well below the DoE’s Sunshot ambition. This compares to total system costs of $1.75/watt today.

  Citi solar

What does this mean for rooftop PV and utility scale PV?

Citi has a stab at it here. In the rooftop market, Citi notes that rooftop solar PV is already better than average residential prices in Australia, Germany, Spain, Portugal, and the South-West of the US and is not far away in other countries; it forecasts Japan will get there in 2014-2016, South Korea in 2016-2020, and the UK(!!!) in 2018-2021.

Even in countries that have solar insolation of 900 kWh/kW/year – think Germany, the UK and Russia – the LCOE of rooftop solar has declined from over 60$c/kWh to under 30$c/kWh.

In the utility scale market, Citi says solar PV will be competitive with gas fired power in the medium term in many regions, even if gas prices stay low. For regions with solar insolation of 1900 kWh/kW/year – as in the South-West US or Saudi Arabia – utility scale solar is already cheaper than gas-fired power at a natural gas price of $15/MMBtu, and by 2020 for a gas price of  around $6– 8/MMBtu.

Citi says utility-scale solar is rapidly approaching parity with wholesale electricity prices in a number of countries, including Italy, Spain, the US and China. Depending on the scenario, utility-scale solar could reach parity in Italy as early as 2018, and Spain as early as 2021.

“By 2020, we calculate that utility-scale solar will be competitive with gas-fired power for a broad range of natural gas prices,” it writes. Under the optimistic assumption that the gas price reaches ~$16/MMBtu, utility-scale solar would be cheaper than gas-fired power in all key markets around the world, including the UK, Russia and Germany.

In the US, utility-scale solar located in the South-West would be competitive with gas-fired power at all gas prices over $6-8/MMBtu, depending on whether solar prices fall according to the ‘single-speed’ or ‘three-speed’ scenario. Even with the current shale gas boom, that is where US gas prices are forecast to settle in the medium term.

Here are the graphs that illustrate the most recent points:

The first illustrates how quickly rooftop solar can reach parity with retail electricity prices in various countries, depending on the amount of sun they receive (bottom axis). Australia, for instance, has good solar and reached parity in 2010.

citi solar residential

The next set of graphs shows the two scenarios for utility scale PV compared to wholesale electricity price – guided by year and by insolation.

In Figure 87, the various colour lines represent the level of solar resources. By 2020, it means solar PV in the single speed scenario is competitive with gas at $7/MMBtu by 2020 in sunny regions, but only with gas at $19/MMBtu is less sunny regions. In the three speed scenario, solar PV is competitive with gas at less than $5/MMBtu in sunny regions by 2020, and gas at $15/MMBtu in less sunny regions.


citi solar comparison

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

  1. David Rossiter 7 years ago

    So in the future utilities will be able to compete at an industrial scale with other forms of wholesale bulk power generation, but en route we have already reached socket pricing parity for domestic roof top PV.

    Why would the consumer want to pay the utility for solar PV while rooftop PV will be even more viable in the future??

    Dave Rossiter

  2. Alastair Leith 7 years ago

    Interesting article Giles. As huge recipients of GFC tax-payer wealth transfers it’s good to see CitiGroup making a contribution to something important like Climate Change action.

    Would you be able to provide a link to the original source for the charts? I collect these kinds of charts & diagrams to pull up in talks on BZE Stationary Energy during question time.

    I’d like to use highest resolution available 🙂

  3. JB 7 years ago

    Giles, what’s the title of the Citi broker note this is from? I’m having trouble finding it.

  4. Louise 7 years ago

    I find 25 cents per watt believable.

    Below is a URL about solar paint, it can be painted on, put in an inkjet printer and printed.

    There is a video that explains it.

    For more info, just Google
    “printed solar university Newcastle”

    Recently I read an article from Europe where a professor is working on solar ink as well and he estimated that with large scale production the cost could come down to
    10 cent per watt.

    • Louise 7 years ago

      One newspaper reported that the solar film produced could cost as little as $7 dollar per square meter.

  5. Louise 7 years ago

    One newspaper reported that the solar film produced could cost as little as $7 dollar per square meter.

  6. Andrew Hill 7 years ago

    Citi should stay with what they know….banking. Without a huge technological leap in solar PV technologies that can be comercialized quickly and inexpensively, there is no way on earth that the price/watt on modules could hit 25¢/watt.
    The “Moore’s Law” analogy is completely off-base, yes, solar cells are made of silicon semi-conductor material like a computer chip, however that is where the similarity ends. Even thin-film/ribbon manufacturers, once hailed as the future for cheap, grid-parity priced solar, can not compete with crystaline PV on price today.
    Research into triple-junction cells which would give huge efficiancies per square meter and thus higher output per square meter reducing average price per watt is in such an early stage and so cost prohibative that it is unlikely to make much of an impact in the next 10 to 20 years. (Or may even go the way of the ‘tuned nano-tube’ and selective emitter).
    25¢/watt? I don’t think so. 45¢/watt, sure, but I probably wouldn’t buy if the quality didn’t go into it.
    Global pricing will probably stabilize over the next 5-7 years at around the 50¢/watt mark at the lowest…companies can only operate at a loss for so long even with mergers and economy of scale advantages!

    • Bob Wallace 7 years ago

      Manufacturing costs for silicon panels is apparently already below $0.50/W.

      There are more automated systems designed and will be installed once manufacturing levels pick up a bit.

      As the least efficient manufacturers are weeded out and the survivors increase their output efficiencies of scale will kick in.

      Increases in panel efficiency will drop the cost per watt. Remember, as you increase efficiency you get more watts from the same amount of glass, aluminum frame, connector box, etc.

      Will we hit $0.25/W? I don’t know. But I’ve little doubt we’ll drop below where we are today and today’s prices are pretty sweet.

      If the US were installing at Germany’s price (<$2/W without subsidies)we would produce electricity at 8 to 10 cents per kWh in the "lower 48". That's cheap electricity at the retail level when the national average is 12 cents. Getting below $2/W installed is the threshold for solar success.

  7. Personal Shoplifter 6 years ago
  8. Eve Cobbler 6 years ago

    Thank You

Comments are closed.

Get up to 3 quotes from pre-vetted solar (and battery) installers.