Carnegie commits to Australia after ARENA pitches in $11m | RenewEconomy

Carnegie commits to Australia after ARENA pitches in $11m

Carnegie Wave Energy has committed to building its first commercial scale plant in Australia after Australian Renewable Energy Agency commits $11m.


Perth-based Carnegie Wave Energy has committed to developing its first commercial scale wave energy project in Australia, after the Australian Renewable Energy Agency said it would commit $11 million to the $46 million project.

The funding, which adds to a $20 million promised by the Clean Energy Finance Corporation, means that Carnegie will build a three-machine of its CETO-6 technology off Garden Island naval base near Perth/

The decision means that for nearly the first time, a full scale commercial operation from an Australian array is actually built in Australia – rather than following other technologies offshore.

The Garden Island project can be scaled much higher, and Carnegie will however, also build another plant at the UK’s wave energy hub, where it will have space for a 5MW plant, and where the company will receive five renewable energy certificates for every MWh produced.

Carnegie ceto 6Carnegie is currently building a demonstration plant using CETO 5 technology to generate zero-emission power and direct desalinated water. The CETO 6 technology is bigger in scale, and will reduce operating costs considerably.

Carnegie Wave Energy Limited  is focused on developing and commercialising its 100% owned CETO wave energy technology which is capable of producing zero-emission power and direct desalinated water.

“The $46 million CETO 6 project represents the next generation of Carnegie’s landmark wave technology and is expected to deliver energy at approximately half the cost of CETO 5,” ARENA CEO Iver Frischknecht said in a statement.

“CETO 6 also allows for offshore power generation, which could enable … operating further from shore, in deep[er] water.”

The CETO 6 units are fully submerged buoys, tethered to the ocean floor and designed to harness energy from the ocean’s waves. They are also larger than the CETO 5 model, making it a key driver of the lower energy cost.

Carnegie says this new technology has the power to match fossil fuels on cost. “CETO 6 builds on knowledge gained from previous generations of the technology and aims to be cost competitive with fossil fuels in certain markets when deployed in large-scale projects” said Frischknecht.

Initially, the project will deploy three CETO 6 units off the coast of Garden Island, WA with plans to generate up to 3MW of power for the HMAS Stirling Navy base, Australia’s largest navel base, part of Carnegie’s existing power supply agreement.

The CETO 6 unit in the Project has a target power capacity of 1MW (1000kW), some four times the current CETO 5 generation being used in the Perth Project.

Carnegie CEO Dr Michael Ottaviano said, “This grant funding represents a crucial element of the CETO 6 Project and we are delighted to have achieved this outcome at this time. In a globally competitive environment this gives us the confidence to move forward quickly and efficiently with the commercialisation of our CETO technology. Carnegie is grateful for the ongoing support of the Australian Government.”

In addition to Australian Government funding received through ARENA’s Emerging Renewables Program, Carnegie has a five-year, $20 million loan facility from the Clean Energy Finance Corporation to support the $46 million CETO 6 Project, as long as it was built in Australia.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

  1. michael 6 years ago

    good luck to them, must have a pretty low chance of success if they have had to access $31M of $46M from the government, though not surprising they struggled to raise that sort of coin for only 3MW of generation capacity and that’s half the cost of CETO-5! they’re obviously very good lobbyists and Carnegie gets the added bonus of not having to dilute ownership with a risk premium through conventional funding avenues. Why aren’t all these supposed ‘ethical’ investing funds supporting these projects? fund raising to support projects instead of fund raising to encourage divestment would be so much more beneficial (ie WWF, Greenpeace etc)

    • Tommyk82 . 6 years ago

      This is a good question, perhaps it is about maintaining some sort of autonomy on their decision making or maybe they are still regarded as too risky for ethical funds to invest into. Maybe ethical funds are invested via share purchasing plans. What the article doesn’t say, is if they still intend to utilise Cornwall as well, which for the purposes of demonstrating to the world, would be so much more international. We just have to hope that wherever these things get put in, they exceed expectations and perform reliably for a very long time.

  2. CM 6 years ago

    This is good news as it provides the opportunity to determine whether it can work in Australian waters. Potentially could supply small coastal towns at the edges or off the grid.

Comments are closed.

Get up to 3 quotes from pre-vetted solar (and battery) installers.