ARENA considers another round of large scale solar funding | RenewEconomy

ARENA considers another round of large scale solar funding

Hunt flags another “equivalent” round of ARENA funding for large scale solar in Australia following overwhelming response to first tender.


The Australian Renewable Energy Agency may make another $100 million of grants available in a new round of funding for large scale solar projects in Australia following the overwhelming response to its latest program.

ARENA has made $100 million available and attracted 77 large scale project proposals across Australia, before narrowing that list down to 22 projects totalling some 767MW of capacity.

The $100 million it will make available is designed to be sufficient to get some 200MW of capacity under way. The Clean Energy Finance Corporation is making a further $250 million of finance available, which might increase the capacity and the number of projects being built.

Now, it appears, ARENA is already considering a further round of a similar scope.

agl solar

The Coalition government, ironically, has yet to withdraw legislation seeking to fold up the operations of ARENA, but environment minister Greg Hunt flagged the likely second round in an interview on Thursday after officiating at the opening of the 102MW solar plant at Nyngan, and the 53MW solar plant in Broken Hill.

“We’ve got projects such as this, and then the new hundred million dollar round, and they (ARENA) have also been talking about a further equivalent round, simply because the uptake of demand is enormous,” Hunt said.

A spokesperson for ARENA confirmed that discussions had taken place, although it was too early to talk about the scope of the new funding round, or the timing.

The ARENA supported projects in Nyngan and Broken Hill had received some $164 million from the agency, and a further $67 million from the NSW government.

But it had established a supply chain for such projects in Australia, which was a critical component for reducing costs.

The next funding round is designed to exploit and further develop that supply chain – which includes several suppliers to the car industry now looking for new industries – and a further funding round could cement those gains.

The Coalition favours large scale solar over large scale wind, at least to the pacify the wind farm critics in the Far Right rump of its own parties.

The government is also keen to be seen to be “doing something” considering the standstill it has created in the large scale renewable energy target.

Despite the overwhelming number of projects being proposed, few if any can get finance because of the lingering uncertainty in the market, and because utilities are not signing power purchase agreement.

Hunt has been meeting various parties to try and find a way through the blockage. A report released this week by Green Energy Markets suggested that 4,400MW of new capacity needed to be committed this year if a shortfall in the target is to be avoided.

If a shortfall does emerge, then those obligated parties (electricity retailers) who fail to meet their quota, will be forced to pay a penalty price. But this will simply be passed on to consumers, with the government – rather than project developers – receiving the money.

Under one scenario canvassed by GEM, up to $2 billion in penalty payments may be made. It noted only 8.5MW of new capacity had been committed in the last four months, a tiny fraction of what is required in the coming year.

That, in turn, will likely trigger a circular blame game between utilities, the government, and the renewable energy industry.

Labor said the Coalition’s “hyprocisy” on renewables had reached new levels as it celebrated the opening of the Nyngan and Broken Hill plants, which is being funded by an agency it is trying to dismantle. It pointed to the sharp slump in large scale renewable investment since the election of Tony Abbott in late 2013.

Asked about the Coalition’s support in the radio interview, Hunt said:

“My view has always been deeply supportive of renewables – I’ve maintained that through all different governments and all different regimes.

It’s been about finding a way to make it work in a cost efficient mechanism – and this plant is fabulous.

“It’s already led to many other proposals in the next big round of Federal Government solar funding, and they’re coming in at a lower cost precisely because of Nyngan and Broken Hill.”

Meanwhile, Federal Labor MP Alannah Mactiernan lamented the “complete and utter inaction” on the part of the Barnett Government – a Coalition government – to support large-scale renewable energy investment in WA.

She said while Ergon Energy in Queensland was looking to contract 150MW of large scale renewables in Queensland, the WA government owned Synergy had called for tenders for large scale generation certificates to meet its RET liabilities, but will allow the certificates to be generated anywhere in Australia.

Only one WA project made the ARENA shortlist. Most came from Queensland and NSW.

“Labor has been warning for years that, with Colin Barnett dismantling the Office of Energy and winding back renewables programs, that WA would end up funding investment in the eastern states and missing out on opportunities to develop WA’s industry and create the jobs of the 21st century.”



Print Friendly, PDF & Email

  1. Damien 5 years ago

    Hi Giles. Am I reading this right?

    “Barnett Government – the only remaining Coalition government on the mainland – to support large-scale renewable energy investment in WA”.

    Is not NSW a Coalition Government? or are you saying the NSW Govt does support large-scale renewable energy?

    • John Saint-Smith 5 years ago

      Well you’ve made me re-read the article a couple of times now, and I can’t find the passage you’re quoting from. The statement is in direct contradiction of the article. The Coalition Government of NSW is supporting large scale solar, along with Queensland. WA’s Synergy isn’t concerned to develop projects in WA.

      “Meanwhile, Federal Labor MP Alannah Mactiernan lamented the “complete and utter inaction” on the part of the Barnett Government – a Coalition government – to support large-scale renewable energy investment in WA.”

  2. humanitarian solar 5 years ago

    I thought we discovered last century, centralised generation is problematic for distribution due to network costs, floods, fires, etc. Isn’t there anything more useful Australia could do with this money? What about researching pilot projects for implementing new generation solar/storage for communities, homes and businesses? Share the money around the community more. Help with the distributed paradigm.

    • Concerned 5 years ago

      Where in Australia are there “increasing” floods cyclones and fires.?

      • humanitarian solar 5 years ago

        Hi Richard, with your qualifications in nuclear, I don’t suppose we’re going to get any joy with a discussion on a distributed paradigm? Your job prospects depend on a centralised paradigm.

        • Concerned 5 years ago

          Dear Human,as someone who deals in facts,my research showsou will find from BMO data,floods and cyclones ,especially in Qld are decreasing in intensity and numbers.So your statement is ” fact free.” Not good.
          Similar trends in the USA
          My qualifications are in Commerce and Safety.

          • humanitarian solar 5 years ago

            As someone who deals in subjective motivations and acknowledges the role of human interpretation, I’m undeterred as I haven’t seen who funded the research. So are you now saying your taking your career away from your post graduate masters in the safety of nuclear?

          • Concerned 5 years ago

            I funded my own study,as one usually does with your own dollars.Nuclear was not the focus,but it was the ability to design relevant safety plans for high risk industriall processes,including oil refineries et al.

          • humanitarian solar 5 years ago

            You realise your speaking to a Social Worker? …among other things. So a distributed paradigm spreads the money around the community, so therefore, its better.

          • Concerned 5 years ago


          • humanitarian solar 5 years ago

            So BMO is a bank in Canada that sponsors soccer and car racing. Have you been to Australia?

          • Concerned 5 years ago

            Ha ha BOM .

          • humanitarian solar 5 years ago

            In Australia we had a hot year last year and savage fires. Are you suggesting these are unrelated?

          • Concerned 5 years ago

            Did we?

          • humanitarian solar 5 years ago

            There’s an article on this site about it.
            Moving to your expertise, what did your Masters have to say about ANSTO?

          • Concerned 5 years ago

            Opened my mind.Whole thing related to compliance with IAEA rules and regulations,and Australian Legislation.We had to critique the whole operation .Outstanding,now a total advocate of nuclear power.
            The add in the economics and it is a no brainer.
            Far cheaper than wind and or solar.

          • Concerned 5 years ago

            You must consult someone with experience in stats.With the normal relation regarding significance level.No,it was not hotter in 2015,and nor is their any data regarding bush fires,

          • Concerned 5 years ago
          • Concerned 5 years ago
      • Cooma Doug 5 years ago

        In all states

  3. humanitarian solar 5 years ago

    It’s important to be aware of the difference between “content” and “process”. Content is putting up solar panels. Process is building a new paradigm.

  4. humanitarian solar 5 years ago

    Additionally, what if we look at electricity provision in terms of strategic defence. What would make a country more vulnerable? Centralised supply or Distributed supply? Long supply lines or short?

Comments are closed.

Get up to 3 quotes from pre-vetted solar (and battery) installers.