Should you be afraid of your smart meter?

Climate Progress

As smart meters proliferate across the country, concerns are bubbling up that their transmissions could affect Americans’ health or privacy. The Maine Public Utilities Commission will actually be holding hearings to hash out the matter on October 30 and 31.

But the case for privacy fears, while real, is based on mixed circumstances and rapidly changing policies. The health fears revolve around the supposed physical effects the radiofrequency radiation (RFR) — a fancy name for the signals released by everything from wireless routers to cell phones — put out by smart meters could have on the human body. The evidence for this second concern is essentially nonexistent.

Ionizing radiation, like what’s used by x-ray machines or caused by nuclear fallout, can actually tear electrons out of our body’s atoms. That causes radiation sickness and alters our chemical make-up, which can lead to cancer. Non-ionizing radiation from common electronics won’t do that, and studies of links between cancer rates and cell phone use found either no linkage, or in rare instances a linkage that wasn’t replicable by further research. But if it comes in short enough wavelengths and high enough frequencies, RFR can heat biological tissue — think of a microwave. It’s just that the RFR from smart meters is neither ionizing nor high frequency and short wavelength. As it stands, your average smart meter emits less RFR than a cell phone, and is well below the regulatory limit set by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC).

A second issue is what’s called electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS). This a supposed reaction to RFR, ionizing or not, that results in allergy-like symptoms including nausea, rashes, irregular heartbeat, weakness, chest pains, etc. A very, very small portion of the population appears to be affected by EHS, and there’s actually a small community of sufferers in the town of Green Bank, where most forms of RFR have been banned to avoid interfering with the nearby National Radio Astronomy Observatory.

The problem is that while the symptoms may be real enough, researchers have been unable to establish a link between them and RFR despite many attempts. In fact, tests reveal EHS sufferers “almost always report symptoms when they know [RFR] is on, and not when they know it is off,” according to James Rubin, a psychologist at King’s College in London who’s gone through the literature. But when participants are incorrectly told when the RFR is on or off, “they report symptoms to the same extent in both conditions.” This suggests the cause is psychogenic.

The final concern is privacy. As the Congressional Research Service put it, “Data recorded by smart meters must be highly detailed, and, consequently, it may show what individual appliances a consumer is using. The data must also be transmitted to electric utilities — and possibly to third parties outside of the smart grid — subjecting it to potential interception or theft as it travels over communications networks and is stored in a variety of physical locations.” The American Civil Liberties Union has noted at least one instance in which major California utilities expressed concerns with the amount of smart meter data that could be handed over to law enforcement, for example. The ACLU recommends that subpoenas be presented to customers themselves rather than utilities, that customer consent be required to share data, and that smart meter installation should be based on an opt-in rather than an opt-out model.

At least part of the problem is the sheer newness of the field. Laws across the federal and state governments, as well as municipalities and individual utility policies, are still crystalizing. And some companies fail to take basic precautions like sending information with proper encryption. Presumably these are the sorts of problems that will get solved as the technology is more widely adopted and standards are converged on. Other suggestions include delinking data from identities, so mass data could be used for social and economic research, but wouldn’t be attributable to individuals. And at least some utilities are already tackling these problems.

Comments

5 responses to “Should you be afraid of your smart meter?”

  1. Chris Fraser Avatar
    Chris Fraser

    I think we give away more personal information with Facebook and Twitter. So it seems the privacy issue is getting blown out of proportion. Hmmm.. So Fred used 3 kWh less on consecutive days ??? Wonder what the NSA is going to do with that information ?

    1. Biff Avatar
      Biff

      Energy efficient terrorists are the biggest threat facing the free world ….. 🙂

      1. Chris Fraser Avatar
        Chris Fraser

        Certainly in the minds of the incumbents at least … but on a more serious level, this information is only legitimate for the network operator and retail biller. If we care about it enough, the information should be protected to stop it leaving those groups as personal data.

  2. Miles Harding Avatar
    Miles Harding

    We probably need to differentiate “smart meters” and smart meters.

    The term is confused between multiple tariff and true smart meters than can accumulate in short blocks and automatically forward the data across a mesh of meters to a collection point in the suburb.

    Privacy fears are real, although any housebreaker casing the joint can simply look at the meter to see if anybody’s at home and consuming power.

    Fears of Ionising radiation is a complete furphy. The comms the meters use is in the few milli-watt range and mostly, this is zigbee over either 900Mhz or 2.4Ghz, both of which are used by mobile phones at hundreds of times the power in the few watt range. This should not even rate a mention in a world flooded with mobile phones.
    I would go further: anybody found to be using their mobile phone to complain about this should be immediately shot.

    Because of the mesh nature of smart meter communications, there needs to be a minimum density for the mesh to function, so these have to be rolled out in a significant density. I feel that far greater challenge for utilities is to suppress their tendency to fleece customers for this supposed great new technology when the actual cost of implementation is very low and offset by the elimination of manual meter reading.

    1. Steve Avatar
      Steve

      Miles, you are absolutely right.

      In Victoria, the 900Mhz mesh radio is used to send data back to the head office of the electricity distributor at 4 hour intervals. This is the LAN (Local Area Network) indicator on the smart meter.

      There is another indicator which is the HAN (Home Area Network) which enables In-Home Displays and other appliances to be connected the to Smart Meters internal Zigbee 2.4Ghz radio. This enables home users to monitor their usage in real time, the cost, solar generation etc.

      Typically the radio strength in a Zigbee In Home Display is 100mW with a quoted range about 30m, meaning the signal is tiny. Further info on the technical elements here http://www.mysmartmeter.com.au/faqs/

Get up to 3 quotes from pre-vetted solar (and battery) installers.