12 large scale solar projects to get ARENA funding. And the winners are ... | RenewEconomy

12 large scale solar projects to get ARENA funding. And the winners are …

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

More than half the shortlisted large-scale solar projects expected to get funding from ARENA tender. A total of 12 projects, mostly with single axis tracking technology and costs as low as $100/MWh are expected to win grants, with solar module costs set to slump again next year.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

All eyes are on the Pullman Hotel in Sydney, where on Thursday, 12 out of the 20 large-scale solar projects shortlisted for the Australian Renewable Energy Agency’s $100 million funding round are expected to be announced as winners of federal government grants.

The announcements are expected to trigger the biggest single investment surge in any renewable energy technology in Australia to date, even outpacing investment in rooftop solar at the height of the premium feed-in tariffs.

moree solar pic 2

Apart from the projects set to go ahead directly from the ARENA tender, the results are also expected to trigger financing commitments for other large-scale solar projects, many of which are keen to cash in on high prices for renewable energy certificates, surging interest in financing from local and international funders, as well as another big slump in the cost of solar modules on international markets.

RenewEconomy understands that 12 of the 20 projects that made the final short list (out of 77 initial inquiries) will get some sort of funding.

The fact that more than half the projects will be helped by ARENA is not unexpected, given the huge reduction in the project costs elicited during the tendering process. It will mean that the ARENA funding round will produce around double the 200MW of large-scale solar capacity that it originally targeted.

It is thought that nine of these 12 projects will be using single axis tracking technology, which a recent study suggests – see our article Solar does work, and a lot better than we thought – provides the best outcome in terms of output and returns on investment.

The tender result is also expected to show that the levellised cost of energy for large-scale solar has fallen to around $100/MWh for the best projects, well below the $135/MWh targeted by ARENA when it started the process.

A lot of this cost reduction is credited to the competitive nature of the bidding process. Last week ARENA chairman Martijn Wilder told ABC Radio the process had knocked down the amount of assistance needed to 10 per cent of project costs from the near 50 per cent needed to get the Nyngan and Broken Hill solar farms built.

It also appears that large energy retailers – under pressure to meet their renewable energy targets, but lately on a capital strike – are prepared to offer around $80-$85/MWh for long-term contracts.

The ARENA funding is needed to make up the funding difference between the PPAs, which tend to last for 10-15 years, and the LCOE, which is an average over the about 25 year life of the plant, at least in the early years of the project.

Other projects, however, such as the 100MW Sun Brilliance project in Western Australia, are prepared to “go merchant”, getting finance on the basis that the output will be sold on the spot electricity market and will cash in on high REC prices, which are also in the mid $80s/MWh at the moment.

The Sun Brilliance project also proposes using single axis tracking technology.

There is, of course, huge speculation about the identity of the ARENA winners, which were due to be confirmed in writing on Wednesday, and announced at a ceremony in Sydney on Thursday.

At recent solar networking events – the popularity of which have defied the Australian network owners lobby’s rather absurd prediction of virtually zero growth in the large scale solar industry over the next two decades – the smart money was for grants funding was focused on a handful of developers with multiple projects.

Several companies, such as Canadian Solar (Oakey and Longreach), Solar Choice (Whitsunday and Gannawarra) and Infigen Energy (Manildra and Capital) have two projects each in the running, and French developer Neoen has three (Dubbo, Parkes and Griffith). Each company is expected to get at least one of their portfolio projects approved.

arena solar map

Other favoured contenders included APA Group’s Emu Downs in Western Australia, Origin Energy’s Darling Downs project in Queensland, and the Genex solar-hydro hybrid project in an old mine in north Queensland. But it appears that these, and more, could make the grade.

The Kennedy wind-solar project in Hughenden, Queensland, which was part of the original 22-long short-list, dropped out after gaining ARENA funding for its proposed mega solar-wind hybrid project in a separate program.

The Queensland projects are expected to do well because they are backed by a state government pledge to support 120MW of large-scale solar by offering power purchase agreements. NSW has also offered similar support, although the nature of the proposal makes it highly conditional.

The ARENA process will have a significant impact on the large scale solar industry. A year ago, obtaining contracts of finance appeared impossible. Now the cost reduction, the growing familiarity with solar projects already built, and the interest of financiers, means it could be about to take off.

The economics of large-scale solar in Australia is expected to be further boosted significantly over the next year as the global solar module market faces another surplus as new production capacity is brought online.

In a report on Wednesday, Deutsche Bank said that module prices are expected to decline from current levels at the mid US40c-mid 50c/watt to the low US40c/W range in most markets globally.

This will help solar achieve “parity” with wind farms. A recent auction by the ACT government for 200MW of large-scale renewable energy capacity suggested that solar prices were not far behind the cost of wind farms.

Some analysts predict that as much large scale solar will be built as wind energy to help meet the 33,000GWh renewable energy target. Others, such as the Energy Networks Association, believe that no large scale solar will be built at all post the ARENA grants.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

  1. Kenshō 4 years ago

    Are any of the large scale RE projects hybrid – RE generation + storage???
    If the projects are adding RE with similar technology to the grid-connect inverters in households over the last decade, then those RE projects will be increasing the need for frequency stability services on the grids. The additional shortcoming of placing that intermittent RE energy on the grid, is the need to upgrade those grid-connect inverters in the future, in order to enhance stability on the grid. Therefore I hope each of these projects is a hybrid install, having some provision of storage and using the latest inverter/charger technology. Otherwise ARENA is being short sighted by going for environmental goals, at the expense of long term financially sustainable goals. As we move away from centralised fossil fuel generation, distributed RE/storage becomes more important. Conversely, lack of distributed RE/storage, seems to result in an element of the community with fear Demand Response Management (DRM) hardware is needed. All in all, I hope these are not merely large scale RE placing an intermittent energy upon our grids. Such a supply would be worth less for Power Purchase Agreements, due to their low ability to add stability to our grids.

    • Matthew Wright 4 years ago

      No we’re still talking relatively small additions. It is something that should be gradually worked on as we need to ramp storage and get storage prices down the cost curve as well but at this early stage in the game I do not see it as any sort of a blocker or problem.

      • Kenshō 4 years ago

        Ok no worries. The environmental imperatives are the most important. The only other factor is getting the RE/storage paradigm running, so those cost reductions in technology can flow down to various levels of local community level infrastructure..

        • Jonathan Prendergast 4 years ago

          Don’t let perfect be the enemy of the good.

          200MW of solar into a grid of 45,000 MW is relatively small.

          • Kenshō 4 years ago

            Nonetheless, it’s an approach resulting in a reaction from fossil fuel generators due to their need for FCAS. Resistance from other stakeholders on the grid will slow the rollout of RE. Giving them ammunition will enable other forms of media to condemn RE.

    • Keith 4 years ago

      The Genex project (Kidston Mine) has solar PV as the start of a hybrid project with a large pumped hydro facility in the old mine. The solar PV will sit on the tailings area. https://reneweconomy.com.au/2016/no-batteries-needed-pumped-hydro-for-energy-storage-79785

    • Craig Allen 4 years ago

      Its a bit rich to demand they be more long-sited when they’re about to have all their funding stripped. All they can do at this stage is be as effective as they can in the last push.

      • Kenshō 4 years ago

        A mother facing death will always want her children to go on. A plant facing death will go to seed. It’s the paradigm that most needs seeding. The paradigm is the whole – not the part. If ARENA wishes to leave a legacy, the community needs RE/storage. From here on, grid-connect inverters will be phased out. With uncooperative utilities unlikely to offer FIT’s, RE/storage is the only way forward.

    • Ian 4 years ago

      Good thinking, but look at the live generation widget about 25 GW of total generation, 1 GW of solar is probably not going to make much of a dent in the overall generation mix ! We all worry about peak oil but in the future this solar projects will encounter peak consumption. Any late comers will not be able to find a market for their daytime product.

      • Kenshō 4 years ago

        Im interested in the community development part i.e. getting exp in the new paradigm of RE/storage.

  2. Adam Hammond 4 years ago

    Every single of one of these projects made financial sense without subsidy and the largest of them is substantially overpriced. Why on Earth ARENA would think it’s a great idea to publicise wasting $92Mn of taxpayer funding when they’re already on life-support is beyond me.

    • james gibson 3 years ago

      How is accelerating solar wasting anything? Did you call it waste when they funded already commercially viable wind projects?

  3. james gibson 3 years ago

    Wind shouldn’t be eligible under the RET any longer due to the drawbacks it has compared to solar.

    Ruining our viewsheds isn’t worth a slightly cheaper electricity price. In a country with as much sun as Australia, solar can and should do the job.

Comments are closed.

Get up to 3 quotes from pre-vetted solar (and battery) installers.