WA to close Muja coal units, in first signs of major shift to renewables

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

As WA’s new Labor government announces closure of Muja AB coal-fired power station the state will have no choice but to turn to wind and solar.

share
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

When the then WA Coalition energy minister Peter Collier opened Australia’s first large scale solar farm – the 10MW Greenough River project near Geraldton – in 2012, he said (quite outrageously) that he hoped he didn’t see another solar plant in the state.

For five years, his wish has come true. But as the new Labor government announces the belated closure of the Muja AB coal fired power station units – scandalously upgraded at a cost of more than $300 million under that Coalition government – the state will find itself with no choice but to turn to wind and solar.

1200px-Muja_Power_Station

The closure, announced by current Labor energy minister Ben Wyatt on Thursday, was foreshadowed more than a year ago, when the former state energy minister Mike Nahan instructed WA’s state-owned utility, Synergy, to shut down 380MW of fossil fuel capacity over the next two years.

The now 52 year-old 240MW Muja A and B units at Collie were an obvious target of the mandate, particularly as it had become a glaring symbol of the state’s disastrous fossil fuel re-investments.

As noted above, a 2009 decision by the then Barnett government to refurbish the plant blew out by $308 million, due to a botched joint-venture deal and corrosion problems.

Then, in November 2015, the wall of the 30-year-old Unit 7 tower attached to the Muja CD plant collapsed, prompting calls for a major safety audit of the Synergy-operated facility, and pushing costs out a further $4 million.5927326-3x2-700x467

But as the state’s taxpayers count the cost, the McGowan government will need to get busy with the task of attracting investment in renewables into the state.

And this will be no small task. The latest data from the Clean Energy Council shows how little development there has been in renewables in Western Australia since the landmark Greenough River plant – in fact only a handful of projects.

While other states like Queensland and New South Wales have between 963MW (Qld) and 1017MW (NSW) of large-scale renewable energy projects under construction, or slated to begin construction in 2017, WA has just 20MW, according to Wednesday’s CEC report.

But there is no shortage of potential for solar and wind in the state, with AEMO suggesting WA will have one of strongest take-ups of renewables, particularly in large-scale and rooftop solar.

Already, rooftop solar is going off in the state. According to recent analysis from the Australian Photovoltaic Institute, using data from the Clean Energy Regulator, suburbs in Western Australia are among the leaders, nationally, where solar houses outnumber households without rooftop PV. The semi-rural area of Baldivis, for example, which is about 50km south of Perth’s CBD, has a remarkable 69 per cent solar homes.

All eyes will now be on the recently elected McGowan government, which came into power promising a push to renewables – and in particular, proposing that biomass generation and large-scale solar be developed in Collie, and committing $100,000 to a pre-feasibility study for pumped hydro, also in Collie – but fell short of committing to a renewable energy target, as other state Labor governments have done.

They also have to figure out what to do with the massive subsidy to consumers that has been built up over years of governments underwriting fossil fuel generation, and which means that today, government still pays one third of the cost of delivery.

As RenewEconomy reported in 2014, a discussion paper prepared at that time by the Electricity Market Review found that more than $1 billion had been spent on the state’s controversial capacity mechanism, much of which was directed to fossil fuel plants that have never been switched on.

This drove up power prices to the highest in the country, and in 2013 the government had to pay $600 million to subsidise the cost of electricity to consumers, a cost that was expected to total more than $2.5 billion over the coming four years.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

9 Comments
  1. George Darroch 2 years ago

    They would be better to remove the subsidies, put the blame on the last government where it belongs, and THEN invest in renewables. Otherwise the Liberal-Murdoch party will falsely claim that solar and wind are the cause of the price hikes.

    • Chris Drongers 2 years ago

      Politically impossible to remove subsidies first (pushing up power prices by up to 40% over 2015 levels largely reflecting distribution costs on a small spread out population) and then get new power in place. By retiring old plant and hopefully encouraging quick replacement with renewables the price rises will be minimised. Also, both Libs and Labor contributed to the current level of subsidies. McGowan is showing an uncommon courage by tackling a generation’s worth of subsidies. Alongside this is a downsizing of the public service to something more in line with the size of the WA population.

  2. George Darroch 2 years ago

    A reduction in industrial demand and an uptake in residential solar fuelled by price increases could mean no need for new plant for a number of years.

    The possible upside is that the large wave of renewable generation in the NEM will not undermine the case for investment in the west, and will mean a large number of operators with skills and capacity.

  3. Eb 2 years ago

    Good to see the WA Govt addressing the over capacity issue by closing some old plants rather than discouraging new generation. I wonder which WA fossil fuel power station will be next to retire . .

  4. Chris Drongers 2 years ago

    Very logical to retire old, high maintenance coal and gas plants.
    More questionable is what they are to be replaced with – Munganna at Geraldton is 300 MW, Kalgoorlie smaller. Both cities are connected by long and relatively low capacity powerlines to major generators at Perth and Collie (also to lose 400MW at Muja A&B). What keeps the lights on at on a still summer night when a bushfire is tripping out the powerlines?

    Also interesting would be to know how the existing contracts for capacity (much of which is never used) will be wound down.

    • Mark Rayner 1 year ago

      Mungarra is only 130 MW and Muja AB is 220 MW. This is sitll signifciant capacity to take out of the system.

  5. Ken Dyer 2 years ago

    Good on you WA Government. Fossil fuelled power stations represent the highest form of idiocy, overseen by the king of idiots Donald Trump and his acolyte Malcolm Turnbull, who no doubt will be outraged by the closure. But if climate change is going to be tackled in any meaningful way, to try and recover a world our children will have to live in, then we have to do these things and put up with minor inconveniences such as short term blackouts until renewable energy catches up. It is not a hard sacrifice when compared to the centuries of future hardship brought about by anthromorphic climate change.

Comments are closed.