Vic Labor ditches 2km wind farm restrictions, reforms planning laws

Victoria’s new Labor Premier Daniel Andrews has announced changes to wind farm planning laws, effectively repealing the worst parts of the Liberal Baillieu government’s controversial “VC82” suite of laws, which had the effect of shutting down wind energy development in the state.

Among the most important changes are a reduction of the household veto for a proposed wind turbine development from 2km to 1km from a dwelling, and the return of development approval decisions to the office of the planning minister.

The reforms have also created an exemption for community wind projects from the no-go zones set up by Baillieu – a law that, according to Friends of the Earth, imposed blanket bans on wind farms in the windiest parts of the state, including the Macedon/McHarg Ranges and Bellarine Peninsula.

Councils will retain responsibility for enforcement of wind energy facilities for new and existing planning permits.

The Australian Wind Alliance said it supported the changes to what it described as “the worst parts” of the previous government’s wind farm planning laws, but that more needed to be done at a national level to sustain the industry nationally.

“Victoria has been missing out on jobs and regional investment from wind farms for too long and this is the first step towards fixing the problem,” said AWA national coordinator Andrew Bray.

“The previous laws strangled the pipeline of new wind farm investment in Victoria, allowing residents up to 2km away to veto turbines. The fact that a CSG well could be drilled within 500m of a home, yet a wind turbine had a buffer of 2 kilometres never made any sense.”

Bray also noted that, in Opposition, the Victorian Coalition had appointed a shadow minister for renewables, David Southwick – a move he hoped signalled a rethink on renewables from the party.

“There is no value for governments of any persuasion to be blocking the development of renewable energy when its so popular with the electorate.”

Indeed, the anti-wind stance adopted by Baillieu – although in keeping with the views of the federal Coalition and its well-documented dislike of view-spoiling wind turbines – proved not to be a politically savvy move.

Nor was it economically smart. In 2013, Friends of the Earth estimated Baillieu’s anti-wind decisions cost the state around $887 million in lost or stalled investment, 650 direct jobs and a further 1,400 indirect jobs.

In the 12 months after the laws were introduced, as many as 14 Victorian wind farm proposals were rendered unlikely to proceed in the state, and no new proposals were announced.

The Andrews government says its reforms to the planning restrictions will revive Victoria’s wind energy industry and strike the right balance between protecting property and supporting jobs in emerging industries – as well as other economic benefits for regional communities.Wind_turbine_-_toora

Minister for Industry, Lily D’Ambrosio, said Labor’s $200 million Future Industries Fund would also work with the renewable energy sector to boost the creation of jobs and investment.

The government has also announced the development of a Victorian Renewable Energy Action Plan, which will outline a comprehensive set of measures to attract Victoria’s share of renewable energy investment.

The establishment of a $20 million New Energy Jobs Fund will also offer support to community groups and businesses developing renewable energy projects.

“Victoria is open for business,” Premier Andrews said in a statement on Friday, borrowing a line from Tony Abbott, but not his policy stance. “Investors want to come to Victoria and back renewable energy. The Liberals said no. We’re saying yes.”

Perhaps even more encouraging, though, is this statement from the minister of planning, Richard Wynne:

“We said we would restart the industry by encouraging community wind farms and today we’re keeping our word.

“These changes will support our wind farm industry – creating jobs, providing clean energy to our homes and minimising our impact on the environment.”

The Clean Energy Council has welcomed the reform, saying the effort would help to unlock billions of dollars in renewables investment – as long as a bipartisan deal could be reached on the national Renewable Energy Target (RET).

“It is important to get the balance right between attracting renewable energy investment to Victoria and ensuring that the voice of communities is heard when building a wind farm,” said CEC policy director Russell Marsh.

“The restrictions introduced by the previous government simply drove wind farm companies to other states and robbed Victoria of investment and job opportunities in regional communities.”

Green group, Friends of the Earth, has also welcomed the changes, but stressed that the Andrews government announcement should pave the way for broader reform of wind energy planning laws.

“Labor’s pledge to exempt community-initiated projects from wind farm restrictions is sensible policy. Yet, the blanket bans on wind farms still prohibit projects that enjoy strong community support,” said Friends of the Earth spokesman Leigh Ewbank.

“We look forward to Labor’s plan to drive the rollout of renewable energy in Victoria now that it has shown intent to remove barriers to the sector,” Ewbank said, adding that this would require the state committing to its own renewable energy target.

Meanwhile, in other news, Big Four bank NAB has reportedly organised a $205 million financing deal for a wind farm in mid-north South Australia, using the US private placement market – a move that the bank is claiming as a first.

The Australian newspaper said on Friday that the Hallett Hill (HH2) wind farm was initially project financed by NAB and recently moved to the production phase, at which point the financing approach changed.

The new placement is understood to have a term of 12 years, which NAB says is longer dated than most maturities generally available in Australia.

The Hallett Hill Senior ­Secured Notes have an issue ­rating of BBB (stable) from Standard & Poor’s and have reportedly been verified in accordance with Green Bond principles by an ­organisation called DNV GL, the paper said.

Comments

13 responses to “Vic Labor ditches 2km wind farm restrictions, reforms planning laws”

  1. Blair Donaldson Avatar
    Blair Donaldson

    At long last, sanity prevails. Now the stalled projects need to be kickstarted so we can catch up on the lost investment, jobs and clean energy generation.

  2. Melissa Avatar
    Melissa

    Sanity huh? Will a line on renewable development ever be drawn, or will Victorian properties and landscapes be completely destroyed like pictured here at the biggest wind development in the UK? It’s not really a good look for the highly populated Bellarine Peninsula and really, it’s not such a good look anywhere when they start rusting, spewing oil and breaking down.
    Land devaluation near industrial wind plants, isn’t that lost investment? Are the few jobs worth the sacrifice to peoples amenity? Ignoring warnings of noise, vibration and sensation impacts and ill health to life near turbines and then removing the protective buffer zone, limited as it was; creates a new set of problems these planning laws and beliefs supporting it haven’t taken into account.
    The energy backup demand to support renewables when the wind or sun stop renewable electricity generation, might just come from the CSG mining most of us in South West Victoria detest.

    1. Barri Mundee Avatar
      Barri Mundee

      Gee Melissa, you’d hate living where I am (Morwell area) which has four very large brown coal plants in the central Latrobe Valley. Not only do they spew out noxious gases, CO2 and other oxides of nitrogen, but they dominate the landscape and are ugly and noisy.(Much more so than wind turbines). On windy days the top surface of the open cut mines tends to fly off and get into the air. Locals suffer higher than average rates of health problems from coal-pollution and then we had the Morwell open cut fire which burnt for about 40 days rendering the air toxic to the people in the town. (Quite a few were forced to move out until the fire was finally extinguished about 40 days later).

      And you complain about wind turbines which do not pollute the air as cars, trucks and coal power stations do. They will not be sited close to residences and all reputable scientific studies have shown no detectable link of any noise with health problems. The area hosting the turbines has to be a high wind area so this necessarily limits their deployment to a relatively small area. The land beneath the turbines is usable for farming due to the small footprint of a turbine and cattle and sheep grazing directly below do not exhibit sings of distress. Property values hosting wind farms will hold up as the owner receives royalty payments which are a good source of reliable income.

      Of course, you are so right that the wind does not blow all the time. That is why the grid is there, to source electricity from solar and gas, hydro and coal.

      1. Neville Bott Avatar
        Neville Bott

        Barri

        Take a closer look at that picture, is it even real ? Possibly but maybe not.

        BTW Your probably replying to a some sort of drone, but I’m sure some of the other readers here appreciated your comment as much as I did..

        1. Barri Mundee Avatar
          Barri Mundee

          Thanks Neville. I think you are correct about the photo, looking at your link.

          it is a sing of the credibility and impact of this site when the cranks, trolls and paid propagandists of the forces in whose interests it is to delay the widespread use of renewables and to try to spread misinformation as per the tobacco industry.

      2. Neville Bott Avatar
        Neville Bott

        PS I did a quick google image search this image was used in 17 July 2011 by Matt Rudd

        http://www.epaw.org/documents.php?article=d5

        1. Social responsibility is dead. Avatar
          Social responsibility is dead.

          Ha ha, fake photo – with article talking about “blades of fury” and “eagle chopping” – just the hysteria you get with new technology.
          No evidence a single bird is unable to make its way through the slowly moving blades of free fuel from the wind.

        2. Miles Harding Avatar
          Miles Harding

          More alarmist crap!

          Those look to be 20 to 50kw units (ancient, if anything) and would not equal half a dozen current 2MW units.

          Also, the placements look dodgy, so this may be a photoshop.

          1. Alan S Avatar
            Alan S

            If that’s Whitelee in Scotland, Britain’s largest onshore wind farm, according to Wiki its 215 turbines are spread over a 55 sq km area. Those in the photo look far more crowded than those in the Scottish Power Renewables’ Whitelee website.

      3. Coley Avatar
        Coley

        That picture is a fake as a nine bob note, I live next to a wind farm and it’s not a problem, the open cast mine and the Blyth power station were though, but now there gone, give me a wind farm anyway!

    2. Blair Donaldson Avatar
      Blair Donaldson

      Melissa, every one of your excuses has been shown to be wrong time and again. Just be honest for once and admit you’re only interested in yourself, not the planet or the generations to come after you. You might be more credible if you didn’t exaggerate so much.

    3. Social responsibility is dead. Avatar
      Social responsibility is dead.

      When people start going on about the “health” effects of wind farms, and the appearance, you know there is bias.
      Coal burning, fracking etc have proven adverse health effects, and the devastation to health and well being caused by climate change is immeasurable.
      Just the expreme weather events, rising sea levels and loss of arable land will lead to the death of millions.
      Coal burning leads to lung and heart disease, and puts a lot of sulphur and even lead into the atmosphere.
      Solar generation can now be stored, there are interesting methods using the heating of salt towers in the US that you might be interested in.
      Renewables ARE the future, and people will cope!

    4. Alan S Avatar
      Alan S

      When anybody uses the phrase ‘industrial wind turbines’ I can guess what the rest of the post’s going to say. It’s predictable and straight out of the Waubra songbook.

      I’ve walked amongst turbines on the Cumbrian coast near Calder Hall and Windscale nuclear power facilities and they’re easier on the eye than those two. My brain survived the ‘infrasound’ when standing directly under rotating blades and their ‘glint’ didn’t make me blind. The land loss is a few square metres per turbine, sheep/cattle graze around them and walking and downhill bike trails have been constructed – try that at a coal/gas/nuclear station.

Get up to 3 quotes from pre-vetted solar (and battery) installers.