Standards Australia renews threat of home battery storage ban

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Standards Australia guidelines may ban installations of battery storage in homes or garages, despite industry backlash against draft proposals.

share
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Fresh concerns have emerged over the introduction of potentially industry-crippling battery installation safety guidelines, after the release of a draft report from Standards Australia appears to have upheld a controversial recommendation that effectively ban battery storage systems inside homes and garages.

The draft guidelines – which were first aired in February this year, and again by the Queensland industry regulator but quickly hosed down after a major industry-wide backlash – still appear to recommend that most current technology home energy storage units be located outside of homes, in independent “kiosks” or “bunkers.”

tesla powerwall 2

Clean Energy Council CEO Kane Thornton says the industry had hoped that the controversial guidelines would be scrapped after the similar recommendation from Queensland regulators, which also surfaced in February, was revised out of that state’s guidelines following consultation with industry.

And he said that a previous disclaimer from Standards Australia, that state governments did not have to adopt the recommendations, was not good enough.

“There do need to be strong standards across the industries, and therefore as this progresses, whatever standard is reached will be applied to the industry. …therefore we’re very engaged and concerned,” Thornton told RenewEconomy on Wednesday.

“Things have moved on, there’s been a lot of progress in terms on international standards and what’s happening in Australia. We now hope common sense prevails,” he said, adding that if it didn’t, there could be some “pretty significant ramifications.”

Industry players will also be hoping for some common sense, having already condemned the proposed SA guidelines as “ridiculous” and over the top, particularly in comparison with international standards.

They have also warned that the requirement for batteries to be housed in independent structures risked adding thousands of dollars to the cost of battery installation in Australia, making it uneconomic for the millions of solar households in Australia keen to store and batter manage their PV generation.

“In Europe, we have 30,000 installations and some of those have been around since 2010, and not one fire has happened, no one has been injured,” said Chris Parratt, who heads up the Australian operations of global battery giant Sonnen, in comments in February.

“There is a standard being released in Germany that allows for lithium-ion batteries to be installed in homes. So why Australia appears to be going the opposite way, I don’t know,” Parratt said.

“If you’re going to ban the installation of all battery storage in the home, you might as well ban all laptops,” said Richard Turner, the CEO of Adelaide based Zen Energy, which partners with one of the industry’s pioneering battery storage makers, Greensmith.

“It’s just a ridiculous position for this country to be in when we have the best renewable energy resource to harness and individuals can basically be energy independent in their own homes.”

For the CEC’s part, the industry body has pledged to mount a strong campaign to have the standards removed or revised.

“Heavy-handed regulation of home energy storage devices risks crippling one of the most exciting industries of the future before it gets going,” it said in a statement on Wednesday.

“We believe that as long as home energy storage units meet strong international standards and are installed by an accredited installer to clear guidelines, requiring units to be installed outside of a house is unnecessarily restrictive,” it said.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

68 Comments
  1. ROSSC 1 year ago

    Standards Australia is a private body now, can anyone tell me who owns them by any chance?

  2. Ron Barnes 1 year ago

    if thats the case ban all cars trucks buses everything with a battery as this is nonsense when installed correctly their should never be a battery exploding
    Just have over loading safety switches on the units

  3. coreidae 1 year ago

    “the requirement for batteries to be housed in independent structures risked adding thousands of dollars to the cost of battery installation in Australia, making it uneconomic for the millions of solar households in Australia keen to store and better manage their PV generation.”

    That would be the whole point of this, wouldn’t it? Think about the politics.

    • Ken Dyer 1 year ago

      To the best of my knowledge, what is driving this, as well as the preponderance of legacy industries represented on Standards Australia, is covered in the following article:

      https://reneweconomy.com.au/fire-sparks-concerns-over-lack-of-standards-on-battery-storage-52193/

      That means that one installation featured in the article, that if one looks closely, was improperly installed without necessary space around it to facilitate ventilation. Of course the bloody thing was always going to catch fire!
      If you wish to protest, just send it here.

      http://www.standards.org.au/OurOrganisation/News/Pages/Consultation-commences-on-new-draft-standard-for-On-Site-Battery-Systems.aspx

      • Miles Harding 1 year ago

        I was thinking “Boeing767” and “Hoverboard” here. Hoverboard because the design and construction is rubbish in the chinese clones, made worse by serial counterfeiting. Boeing767 because they should have known better.

        The most likely pathways to a fire in a domestic battery are via the inverter/charger and poor cell voltage management (hoverboard or 767, anybody?). The battery itself shouldn’t even get warm at the low discharge rates possible in a household system.

      • coreidae 1 year ago

        Thanks for that, will do.

  4. Greenradagast 1 year ago

    So does this mean that we can’t park an electric car in our garage, or for that matter, a normal car with a battery. I would check the ascociations between Standards SA and the fossil fuel industry and the Coal-ition.

    • MaxG 1 year ago

      This will be the next thing…. wait for it…
      Because the latest AU standard does not allow for batteries being put into garages, EVs with their intrinsic battery storage system cannot be put into garages either.
      LMAO

      • hydrophilia 1 year ago

        Maybe, or the standards may only apply to bespoke battery installations rather than packaged, mass-market things like cars or laptops. There are probably limits to how much manure the public will swallow.

  5. Mark Roest 1 year ago

    Perhaps it’s time to call a spade a spade, and say that this is MEANT to hold back renewable energy, and ESPECIALLY to hold back the possibility of people choosing to go off-grid, and fight it out on that field, instead of going in with one arm tied behind your back. Another idea is to force detailed disclosure of the ostensible risks, so that batteries that can prove they are not subject to those specific risks can push their way into the market in volume. Both Lithium batteries designed for fire safety, and non-lithium batteries in development, could then provide the support for renewable energy in volume.

  6. howardpatr 1 year ago

    Self-regulation whenever it suits this Government but regulation when, as in this case, it suits the likes of the fossil fuel industry.

  7. Jason Van Der Velden 1 year ago

    They are obviously doing this on purpose

  8. wmh 1 year ago

    “Consultation commences on new draft standard for On-Site Battery Systems
    Standards Australia has released for consultation a draft voluntary standard, DR AS/NZS 5139:201X Electrical installations – safety of battery systems for use with power conversion equipment.”

    SA are looking for comments, which need to reach them by 15th August 2017.

  9. solarguy 1 year ago

    Quite likely the FF industry pushing this one. It has no basis in fact or common sense. Their desperate now!

    • Shane White 1 year ago

      They’re

    • Alastair Leith 1 year ago

      Standards in Australia are usually left to govt scientists to determine, this is very odd.

  10. Jason Van Der Velden 1 year ago

    Make a submission to bribes australia regarding the battery standards matter. Dont assume your voices dont count.

    • hydrophilia 1 year ago

      Remind me: isn’t free-market democracy $1=one vote?

  11. Ian 1 year ago

    Its time for an investigation into who works for Standards Au, and who are they aligned with, who funds them and what revolving doors are operating.
    Certainly got the stench of some kind of corruption and / or idiocy.

  12. Robert Westinghouse 1 year ago

    The government is hell-bend on stopping Australians taking control of their own electricity. They want us to pay more because they have done dirty deals with the energy companies. Shame on you, you despicable government who cars for Big Business to the detriment of normal Australians…. Vote the scumbags out.

    • MaxG 1 year ago

      The public has been sold out for decades… nobody really cared… this will continue until we have an uprising… at present it is not bad enough for this to happen.

      • Robert Westinghouse 1 year ago

        Like Peter Finch in Network: I am mad as hell and not going to take it anymore”…I have written AGAIN to my Federal Member….but we need everyone who is being subjected to higher and higher prices to stand their ground. We are not going to let these scumbag keep giving it us….

        • Shane White 1 year ago

          Robert are you as mad as hell about the disaster of a climate being left to younger generations, or that you may not be allowed to install some batteries in a house?

          • Robert Westinghouse 1 year ago

            Hi Shane – I am mad about the government direty deals with BIG Energy. Mad that we are going to leave a mess for our children. Mad because the government is legislating so we are forced to pay HIGH prices and continue to pollute the planet. Mad as hell that the politicians are behaving like spoilt children….

          • Shane White 1 year ago

            And what say do we have? The opportunity to vote every 3 years for frauds and liars campaigning in a faulty system (Roberts, 77 votes). This is getting us nowhere.

          • Robert Westinghouse 1 year ago

            Hi Shane….just do what I do….write to the a-hole and tell him if he does not “represent” the people you will not vote for him. Hit him where ti hurts. Not saying the other a-hole is any better….I am blant: “Andrew Gee I will not vote for you if your party continues to sc&ew the little guy”

          • Shane White 1 year ago

            Waste of time Robert. It’s not that some are worse than others; it’s that no party will admit what climate science is screaming. The public is indifferent to this so on goes this zombie like capitalism led by conservative politics.
            Everyone has it too good, allowing them to ignore the unpalatable and be accepting of the conservative politics that makes up our entire political spectrum.

    • Shane White 1 year ago

      hell-bent

    • Carl Raymond S 1 year ago

      The smoking gun here is proof that Standards Australia have been leant on, or are acting under instructions of government. If such proof exists, let’s hear it – we’ll crucify the bastards through social media.

  13. MaxG 1 year ago

    I am glad I am sorted…

    … meaning I’ve got my 20kWh battery installed a couple of years ago…

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/1979a7144256756ca007e66fe3a88b092e852504200b7d53d519016dfa624bba.jpg

    • mick 1 year ago

      yep me too also glad that when I upgrade I’m confident that I’m isolated enough that I can get away with doing what I want

    • Shane White 1 year ago

      Max I give that 9/10 for tidiness. That leftmost conduit isn’t *quite* exactly vertical, so I’ve deducted 1 point.

    • Joe 1 year ago

      Err Giles, no doubt there will be a requirement to “retrofit” a cage around your battery…you need to be kept safe from yourself, yes.

  14. Peter Campbell 1 year ago

    What about storing 40-50L of highly flammable, volatile hydrocarbon fuel in a garage?

    • hydrophilia 1 year ago

      No worries! That could never create a problem.

      I recall a neighbor calling as his house flooded…then yelling that the neighbor’s garage (under the house) had just exploded. Fuel had leaked out of the auto’s tank as water ran in, then the furnace lit the fumes…

  15. Rob G 1 year ago

    It smells like a coal rat has gotten into standards Australia… dirty tactics for desperate times.

  16. wmh 1 year ago

    I think clause 4.5.3 regarding Lithium battery fire risk is the clause in question.

    It forbids batteries inside or in ceilings or under the floor of domestic dwellings (or within 1m of an egress or the neighbours). Batteries may be mounted outside if enclosed within a 60 minute (60/60/60 FRL) fire rated enclosure or if a barrier, good for 60 minutes flame exposure, is installed to 2m above and 600mm in other directions from the battery.

    I think similar regs apply to gas bottles.

    If your battery goes feral then you will be glad of that 60 minute enclosure.

    • Brunel 1 year ago

      What about solid state lithium batteries that Mr Dyson is developing?

      Basically inflammable.

      • John Herbst 1 year ago

        so, flammable?

        • Brunel 1 year ago

          I mean SSL is much harder to ignite and is much safer.

          nonflammable.

    • Johnnydadda 1 year ago

      Lucky me, my house is made of asbestos!

    • neroden 1 year ago

      Grossly unacceptable and I would immediately install an installation in violation of this bogus clause. ASAP.

      Batteries are a very low fire risk. They’re all over your house already.

    • Joe 1 year ago

      Batteries aren’t gas bottles. Where else in the world are “cages” required for home battery installs. This nonsense can only happen in Australia, the arse end of the world when it comes RE and meaningful action against climate change. Any excuse to prolong COAL will do. I trust that those “Standards” dudes will now require “cages” to be installed around Laptops and Mobile phones…ha, ha, ha.

  17. Robin_Harrison 1 year ago

    More evidence of the economic reach of the fossil fools and how desperate and dirty they’re willing to be as they vainly try to fend off the impending end of the fossil fuel era.
    It won’t help them and it’s happening faster than they think.

  18. john 1 year ago

    I think they have written the standard for worst case possible outcome.
    As in a totally non complaint type of battery management system with sloppy workmanship.
    Perhaps what is needed is compliance with best practice as in no battery system with non compliant management systems being able to be imported or in fact Australian made.
    Is this a total dismissal of the current compliance with Australian Standards or more likely the country as usual does not have any to comply with.
    Believe me this would not surprise because in the chemical industry the country is pathetic frankly.

    • hydrophilia 1 year ago

      Hmmm… perhaps all battery systems will need to be factory-built, with integral safeties and anything else would need to go in the “bunker”. THAT would make a lot more sense…. and would prevent a lot of folks from cutting corners to get the cheapest system possible.

  19. Mick Perger 1 year ago

    It`s a wonder Frydenburger hasen`t latched onto this as a nail in renewable`s coffin ….

    • Tom 1 year ago

      He’s genuinely not smart enough. One of his advisors might let him in on it eventually.

  20. Brunel 1 year ago

    The NBN involves installing a battery inside the house.

    So are they going to ban the NBN batteries?

    • Tom 1 year ago

      Good point.

    • Joe 1 year ago

      God yes, anything to stop Turnbull’s Copper Crapper NBN. If its not 100% fibre…its not on !

  21. Miles Harding 1 year ago

    The proposed standard is proscriptive (there are hundreds of ‘shall’s in it) and dwells on the negative aspects of batteries, and looks to have been written from an industrial perspective. More approprate to a switch yard than a garage.

    It also fails to differentiate types of flow battery or Lithium Ion cell. For example, LiFePO4 is extremely difficult to either set on fire or cause to vent, making it safer than PbSO4 in many applications.

    It would make a lot more sense to approach this form a device safety point of view. The purpose of the standard should be that of preventing harm, not pouring concrete.

    Possibly, the new draft’s concession is a wall mount option which involves 6 hour fire proof surrounds for about 2m above and 600 mm in other directions, as well as staying away form other outdoor appliances, such as gas bottles and A/C units. maybe not too unreasonable, but not practical in many existing dwellings or dwellings on small blocks. (did I read it correctly?)

    This sort of restirictive nonsense is likely to render Suatralia unfit for the century. By effectively banning residential batteries, it will limit the potential to install rooftop solar, which will limit the nation’s capacity to meet it’s present and future greenhouse gas targets.

  22. nakedChimp 1 year ago

    a lot of people have a UPS in their home, including me.. not yet with Li, but the time will come.

  23. Tinman_au 1 year ago

    Who the F**** are these ppl, coal stooges like the LNP?

  24. Radbug 1 year ago

    Okay, so I’ll buy an EV & connect it my inverter. Is Standards Australia going to ban new automotive technology as well? If so, then Australia will become a very strange, antiquated, little country.

  25. Phil 1 year ago

    This is absolutely necessary and a good thing.

    I have done same with my Wet Cells for an off grid setup. Used a vented / bunded fire resistant (steel) external enclosure separated from the main dwelling .

    Tesla also acknowledge this (slight) risk and their powerwall is often mounted externally.

    In NSW (Australia) we have Bushfire attack levels ( B.A.L) legislation where even modest EXTERNAL fire risks are virtually eliminated. You can NOT get a house approved without a BASIX / B.A.L statement performed online and submitted at the development stage .

    The risk of an INTERNAL fire , although small , becomes significant when millions of systems are installed. And some are installed badly as has already been proven with Solar Panels having multiple faults and fires.

    Also it is only fair to reduce the fire risk to your neighbours houses in high density living to ensure ANY fire can not spread to their properties when yours goes up.

    • Chris Fraser 1 year ago

      The existing provisions for fire propagation and bushfire safety in the NCC (Vol2) and AS3959 are worthwhile considering. Both design standards treat habitable areas and non-habitable areas differently as far as the level of fire protection needed for each. For new builds, a worst case risk in the form of a lithium battery on a wall could be added to ensure shielding of habitable areas. I suspect AS boffins have overreached in their fear of rarely occurring lithium fires and would absolutely be going over the top by insisting on a separate enclosure. Different risks presented by different chemistries should also be held in consideration.

      • Phil 1 year ago

        I agree 100% it needs to be intelligently risk analysed.

        That’s why LPGas bottles should have the pressure relief valve facing OUTWARDS and be outdoors.
        This minimises the risk as there is a lot of energy in a 45KG bottle. Ditto EV”s technically they are secure as the batteries are thermally managed in a custom designed enclosure, so low risk.

        And all liquid fuel like petrol should be in approved containers and no more than 20 liters in a domestic dwelling

        Batteries UNLESS in an approved enclosure like the EV could be ANYTHING. And that is the problem. There ARE no standards

  26. juxx0r 1 year ago

    “individuals can basically be energy independent in their own homes.”
    That is their problem right there.

  27. know the score 1 year ago

    Actually, speaking as a firefighter, it is not such a bad idea.
    I have been considering installation issues for my own home and an external or remote location makes a lot of sense. Should my colleagues ever have cause to attend my premises I am aware that the speedy isolation or removal of risks posed to the primary search team might be crucial.

    • Alastair Leith 1 year ago

      So anybody not on a qtr acre block can miss out on storage, hey? How about petrol cars, gas bottles and oil heaters, not a problem presumably?

      • know the score 1 year ago

        Yes, of course they are a problem and that is why we identify such risks in a process known as a size up and attempt to negate or at least mitigate them BEFORE making entry.
        You are not specific about your particular circumstances but I guess the point of a discussion is to learn to see from someone else’s point of view. Perhaps you would be kind enough to explain your issues ?

        • neroden 1 year ago

          We don’t design homes based on planning to set them on fire.

          Lithium-ion batteries, properly installed, are a lot safer than most of the stuff usually stored in a home — it is completely insane to require that they be located outside the home. Way over the top. Obviously there should be installation standards, but this really is the equivalent of prohibiting computers, AA batteries, and stoves inside houses (all are much more likely to catch fire than a storage battery install)

  28. neroden 1 year ago

    “Standards Australia” isn’t a regulatory agency, right? So if they go through with this corrupt attempt to ban batteries, the correct move is to get all local and state governments to explicity reject their “standard” with extreme prejudice. Better yet, to remove all official support for such a corrupt organization and blacklist its fake standards entirely.

  29. Joe 1 year ago

    Following on from the London Towering Inferno we now have public concern in Australia that our own high rise buildings are potential infernos due to lax building standards. Where was Standards Australia on that ? Now Standards Australia are just so happy to come down hard on home battery storage which has never had a problem anywhere. All this whilst multiple laptops and mobile phones exist in most homes. Just gotta wonder what Standards Australia are on about….stymie RE ????

  30. John Franchina 1 year ago

    Do your research. Batteries contain a lot of energy and fires do happen – Li Batteries can go off with a bang. I’m currently working on the supply and installation of a relatively small 15KW single phase 240V UPS with 2 hours hold time for a professional regional communications centre. It has to be housed within a suitably built fire rated room. By the way, the person that was taking about the 767 – it was the 787 Dreamliner that has Li batteries. I personally plan to install a UPS in my own home and when I do, I will make sure that its housed in a suitably safe location. Each to their own. I’ll consider the engineering design and safety while others can go with the conspiracy theories. Personally, I want my home and family to be safe.

  31. David 1 year ago

    The aspect around where batteries are installed is not based on any sound logic. Can you please advise who compiled this standard and who they work for? (i.e. who are the members of the standards committee EL42) Thanks

  32. raven 1 year ago

    A fridge just caused a tragic fire in UK. Standards Australia should set standards to ban fridges from homes and garages. Makes as much sense.

Comments are closed.