Shutting Australia's dirtiest coal plant would have "negligible" impact on power prices: RepuTex | RenewEconomy

Shutting Australia’s dirtiest coal plant would have “negligible” impact on power prices: RepuTex

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Study finds closing Australia’s biggest brown coal power plant as soon as 2017/18 would have “negligible” effect on electricity prices, while addressing the nation’s emissions task and oversupply of capacity in the NEM.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Shutting down the dirtiest of Australia’s coal-fired power generators in the next couple of years would have a “negligible” effect on electricity prices, while also helping to the nation’s emissions reduction task and addressing an oversupply of capacity in the market, a new report has found.

The analysis, by energy and emissions market advisory firm RepuTex, models the introduction of new legislation which would see emissions-intensive generators – like Victoria’s Hazelwood, Loy Yang A, Loy Yang B, and Yallourn – bid competitively for the cost of closure of their plant.


This cost would then be paid for by power stations that remained in operation, proportional to their carbon emissions.

The report found that removing a brown coal generator in 2017-18 would lead to just a 3 per cent increase in the average annual wholesale pool price for electricity, or just $2.20/MWh to $3.00/MWh, depending on the size of the generator retired.

For residential electricity bills, falling network costs may completely offset any cost impact of the new policy, with retail energy prices expected to fall out to 2020.

The policy plan – initially proposed by Australian National University academics Frank Jotzo and Salim Mazouz, and potentially adopted by Labor under its new policy  – would help to cut emissions from the electricity sector, but would do so without the use of public funds, and without a carbon price.

Incentivising the closure of brown coal power plants would also help drive the decarbonisation of the NEM to meet the government’s 2030 emissions reduction target, and to address the oversupply of generation capacity in the market.

And according to RepuTex, now is probably one of the best times to get such a policy plan underway.

“Unlike the period of climate policy development from 2007 to 2013, which took place while distribution and transmission costs were increasing, we are now likely to see downward price pressure and greater competition over the next 12 months,” said RepuTex’s associate director of research, Bret Harper.

“That dynamic means it is a good time for new policy – policymakers have a window of opportunity to drive reform with minimal cost to consumers,” he said.

As RepuTex notes, Australia’s heavily coal-powered electricity sector is responsible for over one-third of national greenhouse gas emissions.

Last year, the NEM recorded total emissions of 164 Mt, with RepuTex analysis indicating that closing one brown coal-fired generator in 2017-18 would reduce emissions by 2 to 6 million tonnes per year, or between 6 to 18 million tonnes over the three years to 2020, depending on the size of the generator removed.

“Despite an established ‘oversupply’ in the system, we are unlikely to see any retirement of brown-coal generation unless this sort of policy is implemented, so the status quo will simply continue,” he said.

“Direct regulation to ensure the orderly exit of emissions intensive generation is the best way to minimise the cost to consumers, reduce national emissions and get industry on board.

“Placing the cost of closure on industry, but allowing industry to benefit from increased pool prices, means that generators are incentivised to participate, and taxpayer funding is not required,” Harper said.

RepuTex notes that the policy proposal would, however, need to be supported by a longer-term policy to decarbonise the sector.

“In reality, there is no silver bullet to curb Australia’s rising emissions challenge. Industry funded auctions have the capacity to make immediate emissions reductions within the power sector, however, an emissions baseline or cap will also be needed to guide our electricity market to the 2020 and 2030 targets,” Harper said.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

  1. david H 4 years ago

    It would be interesting to know the RepuTex definition of “cost of closer” for the brown coal power plants, as I expect the power plant owners will have a very different take on this.
    Why not simply bring in legislation that progressively reduces the the allowable CO2 emissions per MWh of electricity produced from utility fossil fuel fired power plants?
    This is done very effectively in other parts of the world. Most of these power stations are dated and should be substantially depreciated, plus the owners should have made adequate provision for remediation of these sites.
    It seems to me that in Aus we are moving more to the mind set of “no decision is a good decision.” It certainly is the easiest decision!

  2. onesecond 4 years ago

    A carbon tax would be an excellent idea and bring great benefits to the Australian economy via avoided health and environmental costs. If only someone smart thought of this, Australia would be on the road to innovation, sustainability and lesser costs. Surely if someone thought of this, noone would be so moronic to put someone in charge to abolish this, as this would be completely crazy.

  3. Mike Dill 4 years ago

    The coal plants cannot compete on price with power that requires no fuel.
    Rooftop solar is already less than the transmission costs.
    Storage will be there is less than a decade.
    There will not be a market for coal in fifteen years.

    ACT will be mostly renewable by 2025. With a bit more wind TAS should be there by 2025 also. VIC and QLD are now slowly heading in the same direction, with SA and WA also moving, perhaps even faster. I have not seen much from NT recently, so I have no Idea where they are headed.

Comments are closed.

Get up to 3 quotes from pre-vetted solar (and battery) installers.