Renewables split on proposals to trade wind farms for coal closures

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The renewables industry is divided over proposals to compromise on renewable energy targets, including the suggestion wind farm projects be traded away for closure of coal-fired plant. Some accuse the industry of being a victim of its own lack of ambition.

share
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The Australian renewable energy industry appears to have been split asunder by confirmation this week that some of the major players were willing to cut a deal with the incumbent utilities over the future of the renewable energy target.

The admission by Infigen Energy Miles George at the All-Energy conference in Melbourne on Wednesday that he was prepared to see the 2020 target diluted in return for longer term targets, higher stepping stones and “greater certainty” provoked a lot of surprise, and a mix of support and anger.

It appears that the renewables industry has been split into two. There are those who believe that clean energy is on the right side of history, and the right side of economics, and should stand firm as fossil fuels are slowly priced out of the market.

There are others who fear that failure to reach a compromise risks a “scorched earth” scenario, where the incumbents, backed by the weight of ideological support in the conservative governments in power in Canberra and the state capitals, effectively bring renewable energy development to a halt.

If there is any doubt over such intentions, you only have to read WA Energy Minister Mike Nahan’s remarks that he would prefer to invest in renewable projects interstate rather than dilute the value of assets in his home market.

Queensland’s Campbell Newman has fought to have the LRET removed entirely, “independent” so-called “consumer watchdogs” such as state pricing regulator IPART have argued the same. And while federal environment minister Greg Hunt has nominal carriage of the LRET, the long trousers are worn by industry minister Ian Macfarlane, whose portfolio includes energy and who has prior form on bringing renewable energy targets to a grinding halt.

The extent to which the renewables industry is prepared to compromise came in one suggestion that the 41,000GWh fixed target be retained, but that gigawatt hours be subtracted from the target via any coal-fired station that is retired permanently from the market.

It sounds like an extension of the Direct Action emissions reduction fund, or the contract for closures policy. The removal of a big brown coal generator such as Yallourn or Hazelwood, for instance, would take around 14,000GWh of annual production out of the market.

If that was deducted from the renewable energy target, it would effectively take the target down to where the likes of those asset owners were pushing for in the last review. The removal of a large baseload generator would also help lift wholesale prices.

Many in the renewable energy space suggest the industry has become the victim of its own lack of ambition and its failure to present a united and effective lobbying body. Greens leader Christine Milne has often berated the clean energy industry for not standing on principle.

As it turns out, the industry is at a virtual standstill, with no contracts being written by the big utilities and financiers standing on the sidelines. Some of the better projects are still trying to find a way to market via innovative financing options, but others have given up.

The wind industry is the most impacted by the standstill, and will be by any dilution of the target, as it means that solar projects will soon compete on cost and many “second tier” wind projects will not see the light of day. The solar industry is less impacted, because a lot of its focus is currently on rooftop and distributed projects, but it is appalled by the developments because they have the potential to impact large-scale projects in the future.

Several large international equipment suppliers have told RenewEconomy in the last few days that they are turning their focus towards neighbouring countries, including Thailand, Vietnam and Malaysia – which have weaker renewable resources but better policies.

This is, in effect, a repeat of the situation nearly a decade ago, when last Macfarlane was in the energy portfolio, and Australia’s leading renewable energy developers at the time – such as Pacific Hydro and Roaring 40s – swung all their efforts into international markets.

Just how the renewable energy industry works itself back into the market will be interesting to see. One thing is clear, the fossil fuel generators have never held so much market, regulatory or political sway as they do now – with the possible exception of a decade ago.

The difference now is that the coal-fired generators, in particular, can see where their future lies, and it is inevitably in closure. They just have the means to ensure that they can clip the ticket on the way out.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

4 Comments
  1. Keith 6 years ago

    Bad for everyone to give up just when the tide is turning.

  2. Michel Rahme 6 years ago

    Stand ground, stand ground!

  3. RobS 6 years ago

    In places where subsidies have been heavily cut like WA and Qld the conservative Governments have been left literally speechless by ongoing demand growth despite the cuts. They believed so strongly that the only reason there was interest was government support, they fully expected demand to collapse after the subsidies ended, yet support has grown. Watching Nahan speak recently his incredulity has been clear, his entire view of energy politics has been rocked to the core and he and his Government are struggling to develop a response to this polar switch in market dynamics to their expectations. Subsidies are literally keeping 50% of the population ideologically opposed to renewable energy. Their removal may create a short term economic hit however the doubling of the potential customer base must be kept in mind. 18 months ago the REC rebate on home solar was almost $2 per watt, today it is ~$0.60. The drop of $1.40 per watt has been met with an increase in demand. Why are we so terrified of dropping the remaining $0.60 when it is all that stands between solar and developing conservative support?

  4. Chatteris 6 years ago

    Any thoughts on this from Reneweconomy? Will the Chinese end up with stranded assets or are they too big for that?
    http://www.miningweekly.com/article/coal-to-surpass-oil-as-top-global-fuel-by-2020-woodmac-2013-10-14

Comments are closed.

Get up to 3 quotes from pre-vetted solar (and battery) installers.