Most of world's coal power stations must close by 2030 to meet Paris target | RenewEconomy

Most of world’s coal power stations must close by 2030 to meet Paris target

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Australia would need to close almost all its coal power generators by 2030 to meet the Paris Agreement, new research has shown.

share
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Governments will need to close most of the world’s coal-fired power stations by 2030, and place a halt on the construction of new coal generators, if there is any hope to successfully limit global warming to around 1.5°C, according to new research published in Nature Communications.

The research – led by a team from the Center for Global Sustainability based at the University of Maryland – found that to meet the Paris 2°C target, the global coal generation fleet would need to close when plants reach an operating age of 35 years, which contrasts to the Australian government assumption that all coal generators will last 50 years, if not more.

This deadline gets even shorter in a scenario that limits warming to no more than 1.5°C, and shorter still if coal-fired power stations currently under development are allowed to be constructed.

“Each year countries delay their commitment to no new coal, they are squeezing the already short timeline necessary for global coal power plant retirement,” lead author of the research paper, Dr Ryna Cui said.

“The lifetime limits for both 2°C and 1.5°C are reduced by five years if plants under construction come online and ten years if all proposed projects are built,” the paper says.

“We find that, while many countries are still actively planning, authorizing, and constructing new coal power plants, this additional capacity is inconsistent with the long-term Paris goals…

“Cost-effective pathways for meeting the well-below 2°C or 1.5°C goals require cancelling new coal projects and reducing operational lifetimes of existing units to 35 and 20 years, respectively.”

This raises the prospect of almost all of the world’s coal-fired power generators needing to close by 2030 to meet a 1.5 °C warming limit.

“Achieving the 2°C goal requires a 720GW or 36% reduction in capacity by 2030, and achieving the 1.5°C goal requires a 1890GW or 94% reduction,” the researchers said.

This would have major implications for the Australian coal-fleet, with much of Australia’s coal-generation fleet already past the age of 35 years, with almost all generators beyond the 20-year operational limit.

The research suggests that if the Australian government is to credibly aim to limit global warming to levels consistent with the Paris Agreement targets, it must prepare for a rapid transition of the Australian energy system away from coal and towards renewables.

Many of Australia’s largest fossil fuel power stations are reaching the end of their operational life, including the 2000MW Liddell coal plant, which is scheduled to close in 2023.

However, the research suggests that other power stations, like the 2,880MW Eraring power station (~35 years old), the 2,640MW Bayswater power station (~35 years old) and the 1,320MW Vales Point power stations (~40 years old) should be earmarked for imminent closure.

The researchers examined emissions trajectories that would allow countries to deliver on the Paris goals of limiting global warming to no more than 2°C, and ideal scenarios that would limit warming to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels.

The researchers found that a majority of the global coal generator fleet would need to close by 2030 to meet the Paris Agreement targets, with a reduction of 60 per cent of coal emissions needed by 2030, and an almost complete phase-out of coal use by 2050 required.

In seeking a cost-effective approach to reaching the Paris Agreement targets, researchers have determined an ‘operational lifetime limit’ for coal-fired generators, which in effect would set the age at which coal-fired power stations must close.

“We find that, compared to the historical average lifetime of approximately 50 years, retiring existing units once they reach a 35-year lifetime can limit warming to 2°C; with a 1.5°C limit, this lifetime is reduced to 20 years. These lifetime limits are 15 and 30 years shorter, respectively, than the typical average lifetime, an important insight for decision-makers assessing new energy investments,” the paper said.

More than 100GW of new coal-fired generation capacity is currently under construction in China, with around 120GW worth of additional projects seeking approval for future construction. There are 91GW of additional projects in the development pipeline in India.

“Successful energy transitions towards low-carbon energy in developing countries are crucial for stabilizing the climate, and based on our analysis, coal power construction must end to protect future generations,” Dr Cui added.

“China and other developing countries have much younger coal fleets, and it is impossible to keep those running for more than 40 years like they have been until today.”

Last week, federal energy minister Angus Taylor indicated that the first six projects flagged for support under the government’s Underwriting New Generation Investments program are expected to be approved by the end of the year. This is expected to include support for an expansion of the Vales Point coal fired power station.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

4 Comments
  1. Chris Drongers 3 months ago

    Paying Vales Point to extend its life does not lock Australia into keeping it operating. As long as the government support doesn’t have a time frame for operation.
    WA with its much smaller population than NSW put $300M into keeping Collie A & B operating. But when it was obvious through continued failures, increasing coal costs and declining sales that it was a zombie power plant, the WA gov bit the bullet, killed the plant and wrote off the loss.
    Morrison could always set up the east coast power stations for a similar (expensive) refurb and close.

    • Joe 3 months ago

      Hi Chris Drongers. Nice that you mention Uncle Trevvies Vales Point. Vales Point was commissioned in 1978 so it no spring chicken anymore. But Uncle Trevvie has plans for Vales Point to extend running for another 20 years with a $750millions price tag to make it so. Very handy that Uncle Trevvie is a donor to the COALition and Anxious Taylor with our collective hard earned, ie Taxes, looking around to ‘support’ power generation…Vales Point / Uncle Trevvie, ready, willing and able to answer the call from $Anxious Taylor$.

    • RobertO 3 months ago

      Hi Chris Drongers,

      So much depends on how my BIG IDIOT taylor does the job. We could get ourselves locked into a long term contract (hidden to protect Commerical in Confidence terms and conditions to protect a third party, say Tomago).

      Until we see any details every option is on the table (and we will be just guessing the reasons).

  2. David Rossiter 3 months ago

    Michael another great article well put.
    In terms of the Paris Agreement the Climate Change Authority stated that Australia has carbon budget of 10.1 billion tonnes of emissions in total from 2013 to 2050 inclusive if we are to do our contribution towards keeping global warming to less than 2 degrees C.
    As we emit something well over 500 million tonnes per year of CO2 and emissions are still rising simple maths tells us our carbon budget can’t last even twenty years. Doing detailed maths with the assumption we meet our target of minus 26% by 2030 gives a similar answer under twenty years – 2032 at best.
    At that point we should respectfully drop to net zero emissions until 2050. So no emissions from 2032 means no coal fired power stations for sure by 2032.

Comments are closed.

Get up to 3 quotes from pre-vetted solar (and battery) installers.