Losing solar bonus points: Qld undercuts its best resource

Only once all energy stakeholders work together, Australia will be in the position to better exploit the greatest of its natural resources – the sun. Therefore, solar energy needs to be accepted as part of Australia’s resources sector.

Resources such as coal and gas are finite and come with environmental burdens. In contrast, solar power is limitless and without carbon dioxide emissions.

It is in the general interest of Australia as a nation, therefore, to promote “mining” of our solar resource. Australian governments and businesses need to work together to develop a sustainable solar industry, which can support tens of thousands of jobs, and drive innovation in smart grid and decentralised generation.

Queensland – the Sunshine State – has the perfect climate for solar, and should be at the forefront of the Australian solar industry’s development. The abrupt and drastic cut of the Queensland Government’s Solar Bonus Scheme jeopardises the state’s opportunity to lead the way for the rest of Australia. A drop in the state feed-in-tariff was to be expected, but the steep cut from 44 c/kWh to 8 c/kWh is unwarranted. A fair and simple 1-for-1 net feed-in-tariff would have been the ideal way forward to ensure the smooth growth of the solar industry in Queensland. A 1-for-1 feed-in tariff would have also encouraged the installation of reliable, long-lasting quality solar systems, because only quality systems provide the benefit of hedging against future electricity price rises.

While Australia’s solar industry has been – and still is – supported by limited federal and state government schemes, the drastic, short-term changes in NSW, WA, SA – and most recently – Queensland, render the sustainable development of the industry more challenging. The sudden drop could lead to harmful flow-on effects, such as job losses in Queensland and the adoption of similar responses by other state governments, such as in Victoria where the feed-in tariff is under review.

Ongoing inconsistencies between federal and state policies – as well as hasty policy changes – make planning for the medium and long term difficult for the entire solar industry, including installers, manufacturers, wholesalers and homeowners.

Credit needs to be given to the Queensland government that participants of the Solar Bonus Scheme who sign up to the 44 c/kWh feed-in tariff prior to midnight on July 9 will still have around one year to ensure their PV system is installed. Although the July 9 deadline creates a rush, Queenslanders must take care to select a PV system that is high in quality, proven in Australian conditions, and suits their needs.

Dr Oliver Hartley is the Managing Director of Q-CELLS Australia. He carried out his PhD research at the University of New South Wales in the field of silicon thin film solar cells

Comments

3 responses to “Losing solar bonus points: Qld undercuts its best resource”

  1. Rob Grant Avatar
    Rob Grant

    None of this should surprise. The opponents of solar are heavily invested in non renewable energy generation, particularly state governments. Utilities have worked it out pretty quickly that their business model is under severe threat and have chosen the low road of opposing solar and obfuscating in order to to frustrate connection and growth of PV.Never give a competitor a break. They could have adopted the high road and developed a services model that embraced and encouraged renweables.
    State Governments have been slower to arrive at the conclusion that solar will devalue their fossil fuel burning assets so they have have now embarked on a program to make it as unattractive as possible. These debates were run and won years ago in Europe, but one can’t help but think that Australian utilities and State Governments are fighting a futile and unwinnable battle as the inevitability of low cost, distributed solar PV dominating energy supply becomes a reality.

  2. Chris Fraser Avatar
    Chris Fraser

    Being a PV supporter gives me hope that PV zealots would not shout me down, if i mention that a 1-for-1 tariff raises issues for renewables and climate wherever such a thing is implemented. Only because of the stop-start nature of Flagships and, i think, future reliance on homeowners to take action with PV. Using the grid as battery in the southern states may encourage priming the grid with large PV arrays in daytime, but taking back hugely at night with coal fired energy, as there is an economic motive for doing so. This will require coal plants to run constantly as before the PV was installed and may not achieve any coal efficiency. Where i think PV will help best is when given the option of home storage. If we consume or store everything we generate a seller’s market for energy rises. Not at all like it is now. It is only within a market environment that a retailer would dare come to us on hot days and ask “Got a spare electron ?”.

  3. Peter Davies Avatar
    Peter Davies

    The issue for utilities is much deeper than simply supporting the status quo. Experience in Europe is showing that run away solar can take the cream off the Peaking Plant sector of the industry, thereby killing investment. So just what is going to replace this capacity in the future? It turns out Solar is not simply an expensive alternative to conventional energy but a disruptive technology, who knew?

    Their real problem though is this particular horse has not only bolted, he took the gate and the side of the barn with him. The public has a taste now and the current trend of huge price rises in retail electricity due in part to past mismanagement and inappropriate profit taking by governments raiding their electricity company piggy banks is only fueling further domestic demand. Avoided electricity costs are at parity, which is rising at 20% per year. PV does not really need a big tariff, only a connection.

Get up to 3 quotes from pre-vetted solar (and battery) installers.