Liverpool Plains coal mine developer Shenhua calls a halt to imports | RenewEconomy

Liverpool Plains coal mine developer Shenhua calls a halt to imports

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Shenhua, the Chinese coal giant proposing to develop controversial coal mine in Liverpool Plains, cut its imports last year to virtually zero. Does it really need a new mine?

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

China Shenhua Energy this week is reporting an 18 per cent drop in coal sales in 2015, to 371 metrics.

Shenhua flagged in March of last year that its coal production was expected to decline 10 percent in 2015, guidance that has proven directionally accurate. Its internal coal production was down 8.4 percent (the 18 percent drop in sales includes coal from third-party providers).

Inside those numbers is this big one: The company’s coal imports fell to almost nothing, down 97 in 2015 to a scant 0.2 metric tons, encapsulating a larger trend in which China’s total coal imports were down 30 percent overall.

Our view is that it’s hardly inconsequential that Shenhua has ceased coal imports, and that the effects of this new reality will be far-reaching. The company is still holding (for now) to its public commitment to the US$1bn development of the Watermark coal project in the Liverpool Plains of New South Wales, Australia, but it seems an empty pledge. T

he project is encumbered by an obvious lack of financial merit. And the absence of any strategic fit is glaring.  Shenhua is simply a company that no longer relies on imported coal and that is faced now with the prospect of continuing to curtail its domestic coal production due to declining demand. It doesn’t need a big new mine in Australia or anyplace else.

We note also in the recent Shenhua data the company was a net coal exporter for the first time in many years (albeit only a net 1 metric ton in 2015). With Shenhua owning its own dedicated in-house rail and coal port infrastructure (in fact, the largest coal port in the world), and with the company reporting a significant net cash profit margin on its in-house coal production, there is scope now for an acceleration of coal exports from China in the face of continued declines in domestic demand.

IEEFA sees a further 1 to 2 percent decline in China coal consumption in 2016, although we note the Chinese authorities are forecasting a more bigger drop, of 3 to 4 percent (after the 4 to 5 percent decline in 2015 and 2.9 percent decline in 2014).

Shenhua’s coal-fired power generation was down 3.6 percent year over year to 210 billion kWh in 2015, consistent with the stagnating electricity demand profile of China and the continued diversification of the Chinese electricity grid away from coal toward more hydro, nuclear, wind and solar generation.

Similar stirrings are taking place in India, where Coal India Limited is on track to report a 10 percent year-over-year growth in coal production in 2015-16 to 540 metric tons. This, in conjunction with Shenhua’s sales-volume collapse, means that Coal India is now by far the largest coal producer on the planet, selling 50 percent more coal that Shenhua and more than double U.S.-based Peabody Energy, the biggest private-sector coal company in the world.

China and India today are producing their own coal, in other words, a trend that doesn’t suggest either country is in the market for coal from other countries.

Tim Buckley is IEEFA’s director of energy finance studies, Australasia. (Here’s a link to the full China Shenhua production report for 2015)

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

  1. Beat Odermatt 4 years ago

    It seems opening more coal mines in Australia makes as much sense then as drilling more holes into our heads. More mines does not mean that Australia makes more profit, but it makes our environmental liabilities a lot bigger.

  2. Reality Bites 4 years ago

    I am sure that Shenhua will read your analysis and halt their $1billion project immediately. How silly of them to not realise they don’t really need any coal, especially when they have already sunk so much money.

    • Mark 4 years ago

      They have sunk a lot of money into these uneconomic projects… the question is will they throw good money after bad… the answer – only if they are fools. Watermark and Carmichael are both dead in the water… I’m sure the companies will be willing to sell the licences at bargain basement prices if you’re in the market to buy Reality Bites

      • Reality Bites 4 years ago

        Just maybe, Tim Buckley is wrong and some of these multi billion dollar companies know stuff about supply and demand that Tim is trying to bury with his continual anti coal propaganda?!

        • whattheblazes 4 years ago

          Interesting, but there definitely is support for his apparent propaganda. Global market trends and China’s continual economic decline, do say otherwise, lending credence to his research.

        • onesecond 4 years ago

          Yeah, reporting facts how they happened is really total propaganda. Coal consumption in China is dropping and India is doing everything to cease coal imports.

    • Jason Van Der Velden 4 years ago

      Im sure your feeble response makes me want to buy so many shares in coal companies right now.

  3. david_fta 4 years ago

    So Watermark won’t go ahead? Thank you, thank you, thank you, Shenhua! If you abandon Watermark, you’ll be doing Australia more good than Tony Abbott has achieved in his entire career.

  4. GlennM 4 years ago

    Can we check the units please ??
    I suspect that that their coal production is more than 540 metric tons ( about 100 truck loads) I suspect there is a “million” missing there somewhere ?

    • Ronald Brakels 4 years ago

      Well, in 2015 Coal India Limited produced 500 million tonnes, so I doubt they will suddenly drop down to 540 tonnes this financial year.

    • Tim Buckley 4 years ago

      GlennM – thanks for noting this, the “metric tons” should read “millions of metric tons”. Sorry about that.

Comments are closed.

Get up to 3 quotes from pre-vetted solar (and battery) installers.