Five things we learned from the Big Solar conference | RenewEconomy

Five things we learned from the Big Solar conference

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Day 2 of the Large-Scale Solar 2017 conference in Sydney saw some interesting themes emerge. Here are five of them…

share
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

RenewEconony and Informa co-hosted day 2 of the 2017 Large-scale Solar Conference in Sydney on Tuesday. The following is a round-up of some of the themes that emerged from the day’s presentations and panels. For more from the two-day conference, click here.

1. Large-scale solar is a tremendous investment opportunity

According to Jevon Carding, who is a senior associate at Lighthouse Infrastructure, big solar is shaping up to be a big ticket item for institutional investors in Australia. Which is why his company has set up the Lighthouse Solar Fund, targeting equity in utility-scale and commercial and industrial rooftop solar and storage.

Screen Shot 2017-04-04 at 2.05.32 pm copy

“Institutional investors are searching for yield, and face a shortage of attractive assets,” Carding told the conference, co-hosted by RenewEconomy and Informa in Sydney on Tuesday. “Solar could be an answer.”

Carding said solar had many of the characteristics of an attractive investment, including falling technology prices, high electricity prices, low level of operational risk, enduring relevance, increasing social acceptance, long asset life, and, of course, “opportunity for scale in the sector.”

2. Investor confidence in solar is growing rapidly, too

Just ask Lane Crockett, whose company – Impact Investment Group – has announced plans to launch its second solar focused fund, as early as mid-2017.

“This time we’re going to ask investors to take construction risk, and to take some merchant exposure,” Crockett told the conference.

“We expect this fund will be between $300-$500 million, and asset size is taking a step up as well. And, of course, bigger fund, bigger impact.

3. Large-scale solar investment delivers more than just financial returns

According to Crockett, IIG’s original $100 million Solar Income Fund will wind up achieving $50 million worth of avoided environment and health damages.

Screen Shot 2017-04-04 at 2.08.05 pm copy

On top of that, he says, “just the assets that will make up a $100 million solar fund will avoid 16,000 (fossil fuel generation pollution) connected illnesses in Australia over its lifetime.

4. The Victorian government’s energy storage tender is (possibly) focused on batteries

With an energy storage tender in the works, it’s no surprise to hear that the Victorian state government is focusing a good deal of its policy energy in that direction. But what technology, if any, are they favouring?

Benjamin White, from the Andrews government’s department of environment, might have offered a clue in his presentation to the conference on Tuesday morning.

“Energy storage is absolutely front and centre in our conversation and our debate and … in Victoria… we see energy storage unlocking the full potential of RE, particularly where we have network constraint,” he said.

“Of course, battery storage, takes centre stage, in terms of timeliness to deploy. But solar thermal and pumped hydro also present significant opportunity.”

5. NSW hearts solar – rooftop and large-scale

We’ll let the charts do the talking (taken from the presentation of NSW renewable energy advocate Amy Kean)…

Kean2 kean3kean1

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

4 Comments
  1. Ian 3 years ago

    Very nice investment movement in utility scale solar. There needs to be forward planning though. The Australian electricity generation market is only about 30 GW. We don’t want to be suppressing this momentum, but at the same time the LGC’s cover 1/2 the costs of these projects, bringing down the ROI to about 5 years or so. A heavy hand has been played on small individual solar installations and now big players are being received with open arms. To tell the truth this leaves a grapefruit taste in the mouth. Storage and wind power is needed to balance solar deployment. Why not tie LGC’s to storage?

    Here’s some ideas: 1. 30% penalty for solar exported in the day 30% bonus for solar exported at peak times.

    2. LGC tied to a percentage of wholesale price up to a cap on bidding prices

    3. LGC only generated if battery or other storage name-plate capacity in MWH matches or exceeds the solar nameplate output in MW. ie a plant with a minimum of 100MWH storage for 100MW of solar can claimLGC.

    4. To receive the LGC either install sufficient battery storage to make the solar output dispatchable at night or gift 50% ownership to community entities/charities.

    • Peter Campbell 3 years ago

      Don’t you get a bonus for exporting any type of generation (or stored generation) at peak times already? IE. because the wholesale price is higher.

  2. neroden 3 years ago

    Does *nobody* know how to fit an exponential curve? Those 2035 projections for home and business solar will happen in 2025, based on an exponential curve fit.

    • humanitarian solar 3 years ago

      As a result of the maximum 5kW inverter rule (including PV inverters), is Tesla going to bring back the DC Powerwall? or anything else being murmured or in the pipeline?

Comments are closed.

Get up to 3 quotes from pre-vetted solar (and battery) installers.