Why Ergon wants to keep new solar off the grid | RenewEconomy

Why Ergon wants to keep new solar off the grid

Ergon Energy says restricting solar exports will encourage consumers to install more solar and storage.


Ergon Energy, the networks distributor for more than 90 per cent of Queensland, has explained why it wants to keep any new solar installations off the grid, and has introduced new rules to stop such exports.

The response came to our story on Friday – Utilities move to kick solar off the grid – which highlighted how Ergon and Energex (which services the south-east corner including Brisbane), will introduce new rules that require systems of 30kW or less to put in technology that limits or removes the ability to export energy back into the grid from rooftop installations.

batteryErgon told RenewEconomy that it wanted to encourage households to install as much solar and battery storage as it wanted. It just didn’t want it on its networks.

The response came in too late to include in our story on Friday, but it is interesting for a whole bunch of reasons – not just for homeowners, the solar industry, and the network operators, but also for generators and retailers.

From July 1, Ergon will allow non-exporting IESs with a capacity up to 30kVA to connect to the main grid with a reduced level of technical assessment compared with exporting systems.

This is because non-exporting IESs do not push network voltages up in the way exporting IESs do and they potentially allow more IESs to be installed over the long term on that local network.

The policy is also consistent with Ergon’s aspiration to give customers more choice and control over the way they source and use their power and it may facilitate some customers installing a battery energy storage system in conjunction with their IES.

However, non-export IESs still affect the grid-supplied electricity demand profile and that can lead to other network issues related to relatively sudden changes in generation.

As a result, the existing policy regarding approval for systems with capacity exceeding 30kVA, which already allows for non-export IESs, will remain in place.

Connections for IESs between 30kVA and 5MVA are handled by our Major Customer Team and have a different set of requirements in terms of protection and commissioning checks.”

This answers a few questions, but begs others.  While the introduction of solar and storage will defer upgrades of poles and wires, particularly in remote areas, what is not clear is how, for instance, will the network recuperate monies for past network investment.

Another interesting question is how Ergon thinks it will manage consumers that install large amounts of solar and storage on to their premises. The next step, to disconnect from the grid, will not be a big one.

Most network operators concede that micro-grids are the way of the future, but as SA Power Networks CEO Ron Stobbe said recently, it is important for the network operator to deal itself into the picture somehow.

So it is reasonable to assume that this is just the first step in what will be a rapid evolution in the way the network does business with customers, and how it fends off or embraces new options that will be presented by providers of home energy systems management.

It promises to be fascinating. But you wouldn’t want to be a retailer or a generator in this environment.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

  1. sean 6 years ago

    Why are generators just praying for more demand? If they wanted more demand why not create it? Build big energy using industries. Why focus on residential consumption?

  2. MrMauricio 6 years ago

    Hahahaha-while Ergon pocket the free electricity fed back into the grid and charges the property next door 35c/kwhr- having contributed nothing whatsoever to its generation-how gullible do they think Queenslanders are???Hmmmm they DID elect Newman!!!

  3. juxx0r 6 years ago

    I don’t get the kerfuffle. All they did was streamline the approval process for a particular setup. You can still apply for the other option, but it’s subject to the previous rules.

  4. Chris Fraser 6 years ago

    Well that makes it a bit clearer thanks Giles. Still, it is very much wrong headed like Friday. They are still setting priority for conventional generators’ energy consumption, of whatever cleanliness, while controlling or stopping the local PV product. It won’t take long before this process is corrupted (think about this Queensland government), and PV will increasingly be turned back merely for political expedience.

  5. nakedChimp 6 years ago

    sounds like cutting of losses to me.. I don’t know how many more people in my street want solar, but can’t as the transformer is already ‘full’ (33%) with back-feed from just 2 grid-connected systems.

    Now Ergon can tell them: Get a hybrid inverter, don’t export.. use grid or batteries for back up.

    And while that is running down they will re-asses the profitability of the network out here and probably get rid of most of it in the medium to long term.
    Will be interesting who is going to run the grids in the little townships around my place.

    Cool with me.

  6. Mick 6 years ago

    Just an off the cuff thought here… Ok lets play the little game here, no export to the grid. Instead you “gift” the excess energy to a neighbor. Your not charging for it and if you were to come to a gentlemans agreement over a few stubbies while having a nice BBQ one weekend. That resulted in your neighbour paying for the cable from your place to theirs. Don’t give it ergon, give it away to a neighbour and say stuff you to the power rip off merchants. Together we can bring them down,

Comments are closed.

Get up to 3 quotes from pre-vetted solar (and battery) installers.