BHP says it taking climate seriously, as Dunlop runs again | RenewEconomy

BHP says it taking climate seriously, as Dunlop runs again

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

BHP Billiton says it is factoring climate into all its investments, unlike the Australian government. The statement comes as Ian Dunlop says he will run again for the board.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

At least the world’s biggest resource company doesn’t agree with the most senior business advisor in Australia: BHP Billiton has told shareholders it is very serious about the impact of climate change, and it underpins its strategic thinking. Unlike the Australian government, whose chief advisor Maurice Newman claims the world is cooling.

In a letter to shareholders, and in response to yet another board tilt by Ian Dunlop, BHP Billion chairman Jac Nasser says climate change is an “integral” part of its strategy development and planning, particularly because its assets are large and long-life.

Ian Dunlop

Nasser said it was planning out to 2035, and while climate issues might affect some business streams (read thermal coal) it would likely boost others (potash, uranium and quality metallurgical coal).

Whether you accept them or not, BHP Billiton’s statement is clearly in stark contrast to the Australian government, which doesn’t even bother with such remarks. Its energy green paper, which also is supposed to plan two decades into the future, downplays climate change and says it only “might” have an impact into the future. The government told the UN summit this week that its priority was the economy – read export of fossil fuels.

BHP Billiton’s statement came as Ian Dunlop, the former Shell executive and head of the Australian coal lobby, said he would stand once again as a candidate for the board, seeking to encourage BHP Billiton to become even more engaged on the climate issue.

BHP Billiton said three shareholders, collectively representing 0.06 per cent of the combined issued share capital of BHP Billiton, have nominated Dunlop to the board.

“Based on our analysis of the current skills and experience, we are once again recommending that shareholders vote against the appointment of Mr Dunlop,” the company wrote. “As you may recall, Mr Dunlop was also nominated in 2013 and was unsuccessful with over 96 per cent of shareholder votes cast against his election.”

Still, BHP Billiton’s statement on climate was clearly issued in response to that.

Here it is in full:

Given the importance of this issue, I wanted to outline the way we consider climate change as an
integral part of our business strategy development and planning.
The Board has responsibility for BHP Billiton’s strategy. This is reviewed on a regular basis. Our
strategy of owning and operating large, long-life, low-cost, expandable upstream resource assets
diversified by commodity and geography has delivered strong returns. It underpins the continuing
creation of long-term sustainable value for shareholders, customers, employees and the
communities in which we operate.
BHP Billiton has a robust corporate planning process. That planning process, and the Board’s
assessment of strategy, business portfolio and future investments, is underpinned by scenario
planning. Scenario planning gives us the ability to evaluate a wide range of global uncertainties
through to 2035 including climate change, geopolitical and technological developments. At the core
of our corporate planning is our acceptance of the most recent assessment of the Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The IPCC’s latest report found that warming of the climate is
unequivocal, human influence is clear and physical impacts are unavoidable. We incorporate the
IPCC’s assessment in our strategy as the base case for climate change science.
We believe our uniquely diversified portfolio is robust across these scenarios and shorter-term shock
events. For example, in a severely carbon constrained world, we believe there is upside for potash
and uranium, and also for our high-quality hard coking coal (lower smelting emissions) and iron ore
lump (direct blast furnace feed) while copper is resilient. In aggregate these mitigate potential
negative impacts in other commodities, given the relatively short pay-back periods for most present
and future investments in fossil fuel production.
Regardless of which direction the world may take, we will always be guided by Our Charter values,
including our value of Sustainability, in how we operate our business, interact with our stakeholders
and plan for the future. A more detailed explanation is set out in our 2014 Notice of Meeting.
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

1 Comment
  1. Rob G 5 years ago

    We continue to see the Abbott idiot team coming last in class. Behind, even those they seek to protect. They know what they are doing is wrong, but they figure if we can muster enough money to bring back a surplus, we might just get another 3 years. Clearly, they will go to any length as is seen in their budget. Remember ” we’re open for mining business”.

Comments are closed.

Get up to 3 quotes from pre-vetted solar (and battery) installers.