5 Stunning small homes . . . but would you live in one?

Shrink That Footprint

rsz_5_homes_cover

Each summer my little family of four spends 10 days camping in a tent that is about 5 m2 (54 ft2).  It is my favorite week of the year. Yet we live in a home that is roughly 110 m2 (1180 ft2).  This begs a question. Would we be happier in a smaller home?

All around the world there is a growing movement of people embracing the idea that for them less home might mean more life. Their motivations may be financial, environmental or even spiritual, but they are all testing the benefits of the same principle: less.

I very much doubt that I’m going to move in to a Tiny House any time soon, but I’m a great believer that in many aspects of life less can be more.  So I’m fascinated by the people pioneering living with less, in particular how less space and less stuff can create more freedom and more time.

While average house size continues to swell in most countries around the world, some folk are bucking the trend by living in small and even tiny homes. For each of these people that journey started with inspiration, so in today’s post I though I’d list 5 small homes that make me wonder . . . could small be beautiful for me?

1) The Life Edited Apartment: 39 m2 (420 ft2)

lifeedited

When you think about a small home it easy to default to gable roofed wooden homes on wheels.  But there is perhaps more serious potential for epic small apartments that make the most of limited city spaces.  That is the philosophy behind Graham Hill’s Life Edited Apartment.  The idea got so much traction it launched a business.

Read more at The Life Edited Apartment

 

2) Broadhurst’s The Crib 23 m2 (250 ft2)

lakehouse

I don’t know whether it is the locations, the garage type door or the high ceilings, but I just love this design concept by Broadhurst Architects.  It is obviously designed as a type of weekend shack and in that sense feels decadent.  But one could do worse than live in something like this.

Read more at The Crib

 

3) Macy Miller’s Minimotives 22 m2 (230 ft2)

minimotives

The real heart of the tiny house movement isn’t populated by famous architects and developers, it’s about DIY dreamers.  Some of these dreamers are great bloggers too, invite you in to understand the guts of their life project.  Macy Miller’s Minimotives blog is awesome for this.  I particularly love her TinyHousers resource.

Read more at Minimotives

 

4) ÁBATON’s Portable House: 27 m2 (290 ft2)

abaton

Of all the small home’s I’ve seen that you could stick on the back of the truck this one by Spanish Architect’s ÁBATON speaks to me most.  It doesn’t use vertical space that much, nor is it rocking ingenious storage.  It is just beautiful design embodying the best of simplicity.  I want to plonk one on a mountain somewhere and just watch the weather go by.

Read more at ÁBATON

 

5) Renzo Piano’s Diogene: 7.5 m2 (81 ft2)

renzo

Architects are a peculiar breed.  Many of them seem to have an almost monastic calling to reduce a form down to its simplest block.  Even though his office designs some of the most iconic buildings in the world Renzo Piano has found time to realize a student dream that tests the limits of minimal.  Diogene is a remarkable little off grid building that includes a pull-out sofa; folding table, shower, toilet and kitchen.

Read more at Vitra

Tiny, small or just smaller?

The bigger your house the more it costs, the more time it takes to clean and the more stuff you get to fill it.  I not convinced truly tiny living has that much broad appeal.  But I’m sure that most people could benefit from experimenting with less on some level. If these still look crazy tiny to you check these 7 Stunning Passive Houses.

 

Source: Shrink That Footprint. Reproduced with permission.

 

 

 

 

Comments

3 responses to “5 Stunning small homes . . . but would you live in one?”

  1. Chris Fraser Avatar
    Chris Fraser

    Great idea. The emergence of these homes with their smaller footprint (literally and figuratively) and new technologies should encourage the notion that home builders and renovators have a wider choice. Even if they were considered only as additional affordable housing.

  2. JohnRD Avatar
    JohnRD

    We use a lot of housing space inefficiently. At any one time most of the house isn’t being used. Think bedrooms during daytime, recreation areas when we are sleeping. There is a lot to be gained from having houses that reconfigure at bedtime etc.
    Then there is the junk. We raised 3 kids and now, after the kids have left, we live in the largest house we have ever lived in. But we are like a gas that fills the available space. We could go a lot smaller before our quality of life starts to be affected or we have to start throwing out stuff we really need..

  3. Craig Allen Avatar
    Craig Allen

    I lived in a small bungalow in an orchid for five years. The kitchen was tiny, the bedroom snug and there were no internal doors. The bathroom/laundry was a small room off the verandah. The the living area (doubling as my office) had a wood stove and big windows along two sides. I loved that place. So many homes are all house and little or no garden. I don’t understand why people are willing to beggar themselves building a dwelling far larger than they need at the expense of having a beautiful garden and outdoor living area.

Get up to 3 quotes from pre-vetted solar (and battery) installers.