Rooftop solar – natural hedge against dirty energy system

A new report from the Centre for Policy Development recommends that Australia fully embraces solar energy as a hedge against volatile gas prices, and future electricity price shocks that could be caused by drought.

The report says rooftop solar can save consumers money, gives them real choice, improve competition and help address network problems. Already, one million homes have rooftop solar PV, and at the very least a million more should follow in coming years, even without high incentives that assisted the initial take-up.

It notes rooftop solar should play a key role in the transition of Australian electricity system to a “cleaner and affordable alternative”, but it warns that the technology would likely face fierce opposition from powerful interests seeking to protect their legacy assets, who are seeking to exploit a political divide over renewables.

CPD says that current political stalemate is preventing the emergence of a long-term policy vision consistent with community desires to realise the benefits of renewable energy. It estimates that in 2012-13, effective support for existing coal-fired electricity was $3.6 billion per year, compared to $1.4 billion for renewable energy.

“Politicians need to base their decisions on where our electricity system is going. Governments which back legacy technologies, while ignoring growing community desires for renewable energy, will face political fallout.”

So far, there has been little sign that politicians understand this. Renewables, particularly solar, are usually portrayed as the villain in rising electricity costs, even though transmission and distribution costs – much of it to support ageing networks and the boom in air-conditioning, and some of it probably not needed at all – have been by far the greatest contributor. (see graph below).

Screen Shot 2013-04-30 at 9.19.52 AM

The CPD report underlines that the key consideration in assessing the value of solar should not be past experience, but future trends. This was a point highlighted in the AEMO assessment of 100% renewables in Australia, released on Monday, which showed that the cost of such a move would be between $200 and $300 billion.

As it turns out, AEMO was instructed by the government not to do a cost comparison with a business-as-usual scenario, but revealed enough information, particularly on retail electricity costs, to suggest that the cost to consumers would be no more than the recent super-sizing of the eastern states grid.

Other studies tell us that renewable energy sources are (in the case of wind) or soon will be (in the case of solar) cheaper than fossil fuel alternatives – a critical point when considering that most of Australia’s generation fleet will need to be replaced in coming decades.

Overseas, the opportunities of rooftop solar for consumers and the implications for established businesses have begun to resonate with industry analysts, as we have shown with these reports from the likes of UBS, Macquarie Group and Deutsche Bank.

This, though, is the first report that looks in detail at the Australian situation. As lead author Laura Eadie told RenewEconomy: “Issues such as electricity price security risks are  just not in the public debate around renewables. We see that constantly. No one is looking at the long term, looking at the benefits, and a lot of the discourse comes  from the assumption that renewables will be more expensive. We are trying to reframe the debate a bit and dispel the well-spread myths that renewables are inherently unreliable.”

The CPD report reaches five major conclusions about the benefits of rooftop solar:

  • It lowers wholesale electricity prices for all consumers –  as long as retailers pass these savings on. It estimates these savings at $300 to $670 million a year in wholesale electricity costs, based on prices in 2009 – 2010.1
  • It gives consumers real choice about their electricity supply and control over their bills, noting that competition between electricity retailers is meant to lower costs, but ends up adding to bills.
  • It can reduce summer peak demand, which may lead to more productive use of existing network infrastructure that consumers have already paid so much for. And in some places, it may also defer or avoid network investment.
  • It creates a base of consumers actively engaged in managing their energy demand. This will be critical to avoid expensive network investment if climate change increases peak demand from air conditioning
  •  It helps insure Australia against future electricity price shocks from gas price volatility and drought. Prices for gas-fired electricity are now linked to volatile international oil prices. Drought can reduce electricity supply from water- cooled coal-fired power plants, raising wholesale electricity prices. It says prices could spike by up to A$250 per year, similar to the amount network charges have added to the average annual household bill since 2007.

“Australia has a window of opportunity over the next two decades to replace ageing fossil fuel plants with renewable generation,” it writes.

“By this time many fossil fuel generators will reach the end of their economic lives, and recent falls in demand and increased renewable electricity suggest that no new fossil fuel plants may need to be built before the end of this decade.

“Australia could spend 5% a year less on our energy by retiring around 7,000 megawatts of coal-fired power capacity and replacing it with decentralized energy, renewables and some peaking gas plants.33 Meeting growth in peak demand through to 2020 with demand management and energy efficiency rather than additional fossil-fuel power, could avoid around $2 billion a year in network costs.

“Solar consumers will play a key role in transforming electricity markets, with benefits for all. Rooftop solar can help manage peak demand, which may lead to more productive use of existing network investment. In some cases, rooftop solar can avoid or defer network upgrades.

“A smooth transition to renewable electricity is essential to avoid the risk of interrupted supply, to lower the costs of reducing carbon emissions, and reduce the impact of climate change that is already locked in. This requires predictable carbon and renewable energy policies. The Commonwealth Government should avoid further changes to the carbon price and Renewable Energy Target, or risk scaring off investors in Australia’s electricity market.”

It makes several recommendations:

  1. Maximise uptake of rooftop solar, to make the most of its benefits. This includes maintaining the renewable energy target and small scale scheme, and ensuring that the Australian Energy Regulator require network operators to conduct cost-benefit analyses on integrating high levels of rooftop solar
  2.  State governments should ensure that solar consumers are not levied higher network charges than other consumers, unless there is clear evidence they contribute to significantly higher costs.
  3. Ensure that financial incentives send a clear signal to rooftop solar consumers to manage peak demand and network costs and ensure consumer advocacy bodies explicitly consider the interests of solar consumers
  4. Invest in innovation to ensure that our electricity grids are flexible enough to support higher levels of rooftop solar.
  5. Develop policy measures to support renters, apartment dwellers and low income households to access the benefits of rooftop solar. And reduce red tape for innovative financing and ownership options, and offer low or zero-interest loans to households who can’t access innovative financing.

 

 

 

 

Comments

14 responses to “Rooftop solar – natural hedge against dirty energy system”

  1. Zvyozdochka Avatar

    We’ve just gone off-grid completely. The house supply is disconnected tomorrow.

    We have everything a modern house has including a dish washer. We don’t have airconditioning as we’d need it maybe twice a year in our Passivhaus.

    I’m hoping to write our 5-year experiences up into a how-to website. We made plenty of mistakes along the way, but the key is to have the data. We also had the luxury of knowing we were going to try this, so we have new appliances and of course a superb thermal design home.

    For the naysayers, we haven’t spent a bomb – a little more. The payback period is embedded into the home loan and is simply a marginal additional weekly figure. If energy prices go up by CPI (they’ve been going up faster here in WA) we’ll be well ahead inside 10 years. We have not used govt subsidies in our calculations.

    1. bill Avatar
      bill

      There another feature of solar electricity which is rarely discussed. Quality.
      I lived in an area where the supply was very spiky and I had difficulties with computers. The PV system smoothed out all that.

    2. Richard Vacman Avatar

      Thanks for the info. Did you use a wind turbine? I do a show on global warming and renewable energy. Tell me what you think. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1EyM7jpE8Pw

  2. Warwick Avatar
    Warwick

    Unfortunately, this study ignores the effects of wholesale contracts in understanding the costs to retailers as pool prices are only a part of the picture. It’s also not true to suggest that because spot prices fall from one year to the next that this is due to solar. You can easily find evidence to suggest the contrary using spot prices i.e. the argument is put forward that solar creates lower spot prices through the “merit order effect” and that is somehow welfare enhancing. There’s been plenty of news about the massive rollout of solar PV in the last year in Queensland so you’d expect prices to fall as this paper suggests…however, in January this year QLD had the second highest average monthly spot price of $155.90/MWh, roughly 5 times the price of last January of $32.22/MWh. Solar did diddly squat for prices in summer in QLD when supposedly “it lowers prices for all consumers”.
    Also, although it makes sense that PV and storage works for remote network, no mention is made in existing urban networks how PV really saves network investment and nor does it cite any of these businesses of any examples of deferred network due to solar.
    So solar is a good technology and ultimately a personal choice but let’s stop pretending that people are doing it for altruistic reasons such as lowering energy prices and network bills for everyone else.

    1. Zvyozdochka Avatar

      Are you arguing the monthly spot price without Solar PV would have definitely been lower? Why?

      1. Warwick Avatar
        Warwick

        I’m just pointing out the folly of suggesting that solar PV reduces spot prices….spot prices increased 5 times in QLD despite all the extra solar…carbon might be responsible for 1/5 of that rise but spot prices went up despite stagnant demand. It is simply untrue to suggest that renewables will consistently reduce spot prices…just look at SA in the last few days with many days over $100/MWh. Peaking and other dispatchable generators will bid higher if they have fewer opportunities to recover their costs…prices will be more volatile and in some circumstances higher.

        Most of these studies consistently ignore the impact of the trading of derivatives, which trade 10’s of billions of dollars each year. It is no understatement to say that this a gaping hole in these analyses.

        So fight the good fight for renewables by highlighting the environmental costs of fossil fuel pollution and the cost of subsidies but stop perpetuating this myth that somehow that the observation of periods of low spot prices means a reduction in prices to consumers. Anyone, who genuinely understands the energy market knows it does not work this way…renewables cost more in the absence of a price on externalities and they don’t reduce consumer prices but their cost impact is not huge. Fighting for a cause on the basis of a false argument is not clever…

        1. Ronald Brakels Avatar
          Ronald Brakels

          Warick, if I built 2 gigawatts of fossil fuel capacity throughout Australia and when it was sunny simply gave the electricity generated away for free, do you think there’s a good chance that wouldn’t decrease spot prices?

          1. Warwick Avatar
            Warwick

            Ron, it’s entirely plausible that spot prices would, ceteris paribus, be lower under your scenario but PV solar is not giving it away for free is the difference…there is the cost of REC’s and Feed-in-tariffs which are much higher than spot prices. Taking the same line of argument but flipping the example i.e. if you closed 2 gigawatts, you’d expect spot prices to be higher, so you could make the case for keeping coal because “it keeps prices lower”…i.e. EVERY generator in effect by creating competition can potentially reduce spot prices so there is nothing special about PV. Plus, spot prices are only part of the costs, there are hedging costs as well as REC’s and FiT’s that all add up.

          2. Ronald Brakels Avatar
            Ronald Brakels

            I thought you might be saying that rooftop solar doesn’t push down wholesale electricity prices, Warwick. I presume that you agree that it does?

        2. James Hilden-Minton Avatar

          It’s impossible for solar not to lower spot prices. In fact it is impossible for any producer to increase a spot price. Solar adds to supply. An increase to a supply can only bring down prices. Conversely, if at any moment solar were taken out of production, this would do nothing to reduce spot prices.

          In the long run, derivative contracts will have to align with the play of supply and demand on the spot market. Naturally, long term contracts may have been written on faulty economic assumptions that no longer reflect market realities, but you cannot lay the fault of a bad contract on new entrants to a market. If you write a contract based on coal being cheaper than gas, you will lose money when gas becomes cheaper than coal. If you base a contract on gas being cheaper than sun light, you will lose money when the sun shines.

          1. Warwick Avatar
            Warwick

            Really? Impossible? So why did spot prices go up in Queensland? The problem that you don’t understand is how generator bidding actually works. It is far from a simple supply and demand curve from economics 101. Existing peaking generators may have to run less often yet their fixed costs don’t fall, also they will need to purchase gas under spot prices rather than long term gas agreements. This means that their short run average costs are higher and they need to recover their costs less frequently i.e higher bidding and spot prices for those times when there is little generation from intermittent sources. So some spot prices might be lower at times but offsetting this will be the higher spikes at other times. It is far from certain what will dominate the annual average price, the peaks or the lows.
            So regardless of whether or not spot prices on average are lower, you have to realise that only the dispatchable generators will sell contracts and despite the extra generation in the spot market there will be less competition in the contracts market.

    2. Paul McArdle Avatar
      Paul McArdle

      Hi Warwick
      We’re having a detailed look at the extent to which solar helped over summer in QLD – more will be posted at http://www.WattClarity.com.au in the coming weeks.
      Cheers
      Paul

      1. Warwick Avatar
        Warwick

        Hi Paul, I trust you weren’t flooded again this summer! Hopefully, you’ll have a go at expanding on what factors make spot prices higher at times of low reserve when there’s usually lots of intermittent generation available. i.e. peakers (and others) pushing up spot prices at those times, like you’ve highlighted what was happening in SA in recent times.

  3. James Hilden-Minton Avatar

    Hedging fossil fuel prices is an excellent way to look as the economic value that solar and wind provide. We need to think in terms of multiple economic scenarios, ones where fuel prices are high, others where they are low. What if the price of oil doubled to $200/barrel over the next 10 years? Natural gas could double or even quadruple as well. Demand for EVs and electrification in general would go way up. Today’s investments in solar and wind will prove golden with only the regret that we had not invested more in renewables and less in gas and oil. On the other hand, we might suppose that fuel prices stay pretty much as low as they currently are. This is what most studies do and conclude that the economics become increasingly favorable for renewables. In either scenario, renewables are beneficial, but in a high fuel price scenario renewable are indespensible. The rational choice is to hedge against rising fuel prices.

Get up to 3 quotes from pre-vetted solar (and battery) installers.