Home » Commentary » No science linking wind farm noise and human health: NHMRC

No science linking wind farm noise and human health: NHMRC

Woolnorth wind farm, Tasmania

A new scientific report released by Australia’s National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) has found no direct link between exposure to wind farm noise and damage to human health, but has recommended more scientific research could be done into the complex community-led issue, which was based on “no strong hypothesis”.

The findings of the report, Evidence on Wind Farms and Human Health, were released on Wednesday along with a statement from the NHRMC saying that, based on their research, there was currently no credible evidence that exposure to wind farms directly affected a person’s physical or mental health.

Woolnorth wind farm, Tasmania
Woolnorth wind farm, Tasmania

“After careful consideration and deliberation of the body of evidence, NHMRC concludes that there is currently no consistent evidence that wind farms cause adverse health effects in humans,” the statement said.

And while there was, it conceded, “some consistent but poor quality direct evidence” that wind farm noise was associated with annoyance, there was “less consistent, poor quality direct evidence of an association between sleep disturbance, stress disorders or hearing disorders, and wind farm noise.

The report is based on a rigorous assessment of the available scientific evidence on wind farms and human health, much of which the report’s authors said was of “very poor quality.”

Emeritus Professor Bruce Armstrong – chair of the NHMRC Wind Farms and Human Health Reference Group and a Professor of Public Health at the University of Sydney – said that of the 4000 pieces of research examined, the vast majority was opinion and editorial material, with only 13 pieces of original research – “and they’re not very good.”

“It is unfortunate that most of the studies were of poor quality,” Armstrong told journalists in a briefing on the report. “None of them were good quality studies, on which we could rely.

“We do know that long continued annoyance can lead to stress and stress has been associated to such things as heart disorders, so there’s a possible indirect connection there. But ultimately, it’s very uncertain whether its a cause and effect relationship.”

Given the poor quality of this evidence, and continued concern expressed by some members of the community, the NHMRC said it supported further high quality, independent scientific research in the area.

But NHMRC CEO Professor Warwick Anderson stressed it would have to be high quality research and be peer reviewed. “We want to spend any research money wisely,” he said.

Interestingly, however, Armstrong stressed that research into effects on people living further than 1500 metres was unwarranted, as there was “absolutely no suggestion of health effects from wind turbine noise at beyond 1500 meters.”

The report also urged authorities with responsibility for regulating wind farms to “undertake appropriate planning, in consultation with communities, and be cognisant of evidence emerging from research.”

Comments

14 responses to “No science linking wind farm noise and human health: NHMRC”

  1. Beat Odermatt Avatar
    Beat Odermatt

    Please forward these findings to Joe Hockey. He may find big holes in the ground, massive power station, substations and power lines more beautiful. However using free wind power whilst conserving resources for future generations should make sense even to him.

  2. Blair Donaldson Avatar
    Blair Donaldson

    I guess no matter how many studies are conducted, a tiny percentage of the population will refuse to accept the evidence. Conspiracy theorists, cranks and the scientifically illiterate will always be driven by “feelings” and suspicion when the facts don’t support them.

    1. SunGod Avatar
      SunGod

      The same kind of people who used to hunt ‘witches’ in the Middle Ages. Arguably they still do, metaphorically speaking.

      If you weigh the same as a duck, you’ve got Wind Turbine Syndrome, so they tell me.

      Wonder if they think sheep’s bladders prevent earthquakes too?

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KrD16CBEJRs

      1. zynismus Avatar
        zynismus

        Go Patsy ! YAY : )

    2. Miles Harding Avatar
      Miles Harding

      And that small fraction is spelled H.O.C.K.E.Y !!

      I like to think of the towers as hard working kinetic art this is helping to deliver us all from a very unpleasant (any maybe unsurvivable) future.

  3. ChrisEcoSouth Avatar
    ChrisEcoSouth

    The reporting of this is a classic example of ‘group monorail thinking’. If we ask the right question ‘What do scientific studies show?’, then we get an answer in terms of a generalisation that applies to all wind turbines. By comparison, if we ask “Could ONE turbine behave to disturb someone’s sleep?” then the answer would entail a completely different path.
    It’s a bit like saying “Are all new model cars too noisy?” and producing a study that shows it is not true. So the small number of new car drivers who experience undesirable vibration and noise – are they told to be comforted by the fact that ‘science shows that new cars don’t do that’? No, they are told to go take it up with who you bought it from – demonstrate the *fault* to them – its a civil/consumer matter.
    Similarly, anyone complaining of loss of sleep should be given paid access to services that check 1) extra low frequency (ELF) noise, *and* 2) ELF ground vibration at their site.
    This stuff is not rocket science! – Turbines *do* cause forms of seismic vibrations:
    http://www.keele.ac.uk/geophysics/appliedseismology/wind/Final_Report.pdf
    IMHO, its just a question of whether you were unlucky enough to be on the receiving end of a ‘faulty’ turbine’s vibrations. Oh yes, they *do* go faulty – drive-train vibration testing here:
    http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/we.1585/abstract
    So, I wonder what happens in the future when turbine gearboxes start wearing and producing increased ELF vibrations?

    Let’s keep our commonsense about us and keep asking healthy questions.

    1. George Michaelson Avatar
      George Michaelson

      is the societal risk of failure to adopt wind, worth investing in the specific mitigation for those people who experience this? because the inverse appears to be the policy space: because a minority experience downside effects, pick any of phantom/noocebo/psychogenic/ELF/vibration and as a consequence nobody gets to do wind because Hockey.

      1. ChrisEcoSouth Avatar
        ChrisEcoSouth

        Do not misunderstand – I am all in favour of wind turbines producing power. But individual turbines must be treated and fault-found like any other piece of technology, IMHO.

    2. Chris Fraser Avatar
      Chris Fraser

      For certain, but it does occur to me that one driver in a million who suffers vibration whilst driving does not endanger the auto industry, generally considering the merits of the car’s utility.

      1. ChrisEcoSouth Avatar
        ChrisEcoSouth

        Yes – I find it curious that we don’t hear much about the (presumably) existing efforts made to eliminate vibration etc that the Wind Turbine industry must do. It should be easy for them to bring this side of things into the open, and in effect say that *another* box is ticked in elimination of objections to wind farms. It does carry with it some tacit admission that turbine operators have a responsibility to make sure there is no vibration set up (one way or another) – but it is in their (reliability) interest to do this anyway.

        1. Chris Fraser Avatar
          Chris Fraser

          There wouldn’t be any technical specification that will satisfy a conscientious objection to a wind farm. I also assume, or want to, that the owner of the asset would have their own interest uppermost in their mind when scheduling maintenance to reduce friction loss and vibration.

          1. ChrisEcoSouth Avatar
            ChrisEcoSouth

            “satisfy a conscientious objection” – true that some will always take issue, but there is great power in ticking two boxes, as opposed to ticking just one, which is all that is happening at present.

    3. disqus_3PLIicDhUu Avatar
      disqus_3PLIicDhUu

      What’s going to happen very soon, is the introduction of electrically larger, physically smaller, superconducting turbines, without a gearbox and at around 15MW each, might go a way to fixing the issue, with less machines with no gearbox, for more output.

  4. disqus_3PLIicDhUu Avatar
    disqus_3PLIicDhUu

    It’s amazing what $$$ compensation to nearby windfarm, land owners, makes them sleep so much more soundly at night, damn crickets.

Get up to 3 quotes from pre-vetted solar (and battery) installers.