Japan’s Tepco plans 7GW renewables roll-out, in pivot away from nuclear

Japan’s biggest utility, Tokyo Electric Power Company, has revealed plans to develop up to 7GW of new renewable energy capacity, marking a major departure from nuclear as the company strives to re-gain “the competitive advantage” in energy generation.

Tepco President Tomoaki Kobayakawa told the Nikkei Asian Review on Monday that the company planned to pour tens of billions of dollars into between 6 and 7GW of renewable energy projects both in Japan and abroad, including offshore wind and hydro power.

Reports suggest the focus in Japan will largely be on offshore wind, including the use of floating turbine technology that is considered to be well suited to the island nation’s relatively deep coastal waters.

And in hydro, Tepco plans to develop sites in south-east Asia, alongside its overseas and domestic wind power businesses. The company reportedly hopes to have each of the three renewables components generating at least 2GW of power.

The sharp turn into renewables comes more than seven years after the 2011 earthquake and tsunami disaster that led to meltdowns at Tepco’s ruined Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station, and the consequent shutdown of all of Japan’s remaining 48 nuclear reactors.

That shut-down continues still – and even reactors that have received approval to restart are struggling to get the social licence to do so, in light of the fallout from the Fukushima disaster.

Renewables, meanwhile, account for just 15 per cent of Tepco’s power output, which is less than its competitors, despite the fact that Tepco is Japan’s largest overall power producer.

“We must gain competitive advantage in renewable energy,” Kobayakawa told the Nikkei.

“This is not a case where one company does everything… I would like to decide on partners in one year from a wide breadth at home and abroad,” he said.

The new tack for Tepco suggests a major change in direction and thinking in the Japanese electricity market, where a skew towards nuclear and “baseload” generation has roughly mirrored Australia’s attachment to coal.

As a 2016 Greenpeace Japan report noted, the nation’s nuclear utilities have had a history of  “(lobbying) hard for the right to block access to the grid for renewable power plants” whenever they deemed it necessary to preserve grid stability.

They argued, said Greenpeace Japan, the all-too familiar line that the fluctuating output of renewables was incompatible with the output of nuclear reactors the government was trying to restart.

But this thinking appears to be shifting, and not just among power companies. A separate report last week in the Nikkei Asian Review noted that renewable energy momentum was also building in Japan’s corporate and industrial sectors, boosted by the liberalisation of the nation’s energy market in 2016.

“More Japanese companies are promising to source all of their electricity from renewable energy in 10 to 30 years,” the news site said. “A trend that could in turn spur investment to bolster grid capacity, to accommodate demand.”

Comments

41 responses to “Japan’s Tepco plans 7GW renewables roll-out, in pivot away from nuclear”

  1. phillyc Avatar
    phillyc

    I like the sentiment to go 100% renewable.

    ““More Japanese companies are promising to source all of their electricity from renewable energy in 10 to 30 years,” the news site said.”

    30 years is too long, quite like the 10 year timeframe though!

    1. Petar Posavec Avatar
      Petar Posavec

      In reality, the globe can easily transition to 100% renewable energy/heat/etc. in about 10 years (probably less if we used automation as much as possible).

      Plus, for extra efficiency. We should harvest existing power plants etc for raw amterimat and convert them into superior synthetic materials for use in construction of solar, wimd, geothermal, tidal and wave power

      1. Shilo Avatar
        Shilo

        10 years, the whole world, to RE, 100%. Can easily do it!!!!!????? Is that like could? or Should? or useing IF in any part???.
        I am not trying to be nasty or smart.
        But the world will either be 100% RE in 10 years or it will not be.
        I will go with it will not be.
        No matter what happens.
        However it would be very nice if it actually did.

        1. Petar Posavec Avatar
          Petar Posavec

          All I’m saying is that nothing technical is preventing the world from going 100% renewable in a decade or less.
          The problem is not technological or resource-wise… its an issue with outdated socio-economic system we use and ridiculously long ‘targets’ which companies have set out for themselves (until 2050 for example).
          The only reason for waiting until 2050 for renewables to gain significant traction is because companies and people in power don’t want to expend too much ‘money’ on it immediately, but instead want to draw it out as slowly as they can without cutting into their profit margins.

          1. Shilo Avatar
            Shilo

            I agree, and your making a statement about something that is not going to happen, no matter what. As sad as that is, thats the reality.
            Its actually going to take a long time to actually get to 100% worldwide.
            However every single day we are getting closer, which in its self it bloody fantastic.
            Nothing is ever perfect and timing of things almost always never goes to plan.
            In this regard I think we have to still push and keep pushing, but feel happy with, “Better late, than never” But not say it until we get to 100%!!!!!!.

          2. Petar Posavec Avatar
            Petar Posavec

            In this instance, we are racing against time because climate vhange wont wait.

            Also. Transition to 100% renewables probably won’t be enough.
            One of the largest contributors to climate change is animal agriculture due to its methane emissions.
            Going vegan can solve that immediate issue, but our outdated farming practices are also in dire need of change (which we had the capacity to do for over 40 years now).

            Plus the ridiculous practice of contucont extraction of raw materials from earth instead of harvesting the landfills for the matter in question.

            As for it not happening in the next 10 years, given the rate kf faster thsn exponential development ovcurring even as we speak, a lot can chamge in a decade.

            Though for reference sake, MIT did a study in 2012 which states that a gloval economic collapse will occur by 2030 (essentially, I tjink this is referring ti capitalism collapsing globally due to heavy automation – and not a moment too soon
            … We need to transition into Resource based economy if we want to ensure continued survival/thriving of humanity on earth and its biosphere in a sustainable capacity (indefinite growth cannot achieve this)

  2. Shilo Avatar
    Shilo

    Its very amazing it has taken Japan this long, they are the best at making solar pannels and batterys, and once they start on wind turbines i am sure that as well

  3. The_Lorax Avatar
    The_Lorax

    Japan is actually building a huge amount new coal-fired power stations.
    http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/05/bucking-global-trends-japan-again-embraces-coal-power

    1. Joe Avatar
      Joe

      Just read that link. Crikey, the Fukushima disaster should have been the moment for Japan to go headlong into RE. Instead its retreating to FF and by his own admission the Japan Environment Minister admits it will hard for Japan to meet it emissions reductions commitments. And I love the piece about the so called Cleeeen Coalers. No description will change the fact that Cleeeen Coalers are still dirty GHG emitters and the so called CCS is commercially unviable. But hey we’ll give that a plug to boost our spin about building new Coalers. I thought the Japanese were a bit smarter than this.

      1. The_Lorax Avatar
        The_Lorax

        Germany is failing to meet it’s emissions targets as well. Germany has around 40 coal and lignite power stations and building more.

        1. Giles Avatar

          No it’s not. It’s just created a coal commission to get bipartisan approach to their closure. Black coal will be gone in a couple of years, the issue is timing of lignite. Germany has easily met its EU/UN targets, it has just fallen short of its own more ambitious goal of cutting emissions by 40% by 2020. But it reckons it will only be a couple of years late.

          1. The_Lorax Avatar
            The_Lorax

            Oh lignite, that’s ok then (!) They’re still building Datteln 4 the last I heard. The UK is kicking Germany’s butt in terms of emissions reductions, and in absolute terms the French have half the emissions per capita of the Germans, as do the Swiss, and the Swedes…

          2. heinbloed Avatar
            heinbloed

            The UK is importing ‘German’ coal power, it’s import dependence is now at 8%:

            http://www.mygridgb.co.uk/historicaldata/

            That is the UK-coal capacity which was closed down in the last 5 or 6 years – replaced by imported coal power and safings in the industrial power demand: due to high power prices the steel industry falterd in the UK.
            The UK’s steel demand is still being covered, by Germany’s mills delivering to the UK …..

          3. The_Lorax Avatar
            The_Lorax

            Which country is the biggest electricity exporter in the world?

          4. heinbloed Avatar
            heinbloed

            Try the search engine….

          5. The_Lorax Avatar
            The_Lorax

            Mate, if Germany is so bloody brilliant why do they have emissions per capita at more than 9 tonnes, UK at ~6, France at ~5 and Switzerland at less than 5? Are these all “lies”? https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/deea87e2353039b90c05695d70a3c29398abfe88a9bac71c173c4cae28d70021.png

          6. The_Lorax Avatar
            The_Lorax

            More lies? The UK climate change act really works. Lets hope we adopt the same model in Australia and don’t do what Germany is doing! https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/92f73dc30d1cd1d8602d651b3dc0a901d5e6559a10a271e87ade899d61184cb7.png

          7. heinbloed Avatar
            heinbloed

            Clown.

            ” The UK climate change …..”

            The UK kills it’s inmates:

            https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/jul/18/asthma-deaths-rise-25-amid-growing-air-pollution-crisis

            https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-35862763

            There are no cold deaths in Germany except some drunks and demented persons falling into the snow and forgetting to get up – about 20-30 persons per winter.

            Better emmigrate, the UK climate change is now killing in summer as well:

            https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-44956855

            Without power imports from Germany Europe’s paupers woul die:

            https://energytransition.org/2015/06/is-germany-reliant-on-foreign-nuclear-power/

          8. The_Lorax Avatar
            The_Lorax

            Are you going to address the fact that Germany has twice the emissions per capita of France, Sweden, Switzerland et al and soon the UK, and is making very slow progress on reducing emissions, or are you going to keep calling me a clown? https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/789de3baec23929b4844db65f990ceaf5d7da66736a8dc82823fd520e6b5bcb6.png

          9. Giles Avatar

            as heinbloed says, datteln 4 is a disaster, been under construction for more than 10 years, before nuclear phase-out announced, was supposed to open in 2011, had major write down already, now scheduled to open in 2020, may be.

          10. The_Lorax Avatar
            The_Lorax

            I didn’t say Datteln 4 was good! They’re still trying to get it running though which is bonkers.

          11. phillyc Avatar
            phillyc

            http://www.4-traders.com/E-ON-3818998/news/Uniper-denies-report-about-Datteln-4-writedown-26739671/
            “Datteln 4, which was originally scheduled to open in 2011, has been a major headache for Uniper, suffering several delays and swallowing 1.2 billion euros in investment so far.”

          12. Bernard Finucane Avatar
            Bernard Finucane

            The coal commission results are hardly a done deal, but the political climate in Germany is definitely moving against coal due to the current heat wave and drought.

        2. heinbloed Avatar
          heinbloed

          “Germany has around 40 coal and lignite power stations and building more.”

          There is only 1 hard coal power plant in the building process (Datteln4) and that is since over a decade.

          In the meantime all existing units closed:

          https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Datteln_Power_Station

          Datteln has ceased power production in 2013.

          The hard coal project Datteln4 is a desaster and might never produce any power, is de facto a net power consumer running now on 40% RE.

          https://www.energy-charts.de/energy_pie.htm

          There are 0 lignite power plants in the building process or being planned:

          https://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/EN/Areas/Energy/Companies/SecurityOfSupply/GeneratingCapacity/PowerPlantList/PubliPowerPlantList_node.html

      2. Giles Avatar

        They are smarter than that, it turns out. 8 are being built, four have been cancelled, and of the remaining 33, one third have just been ruled out by new efficiency rules. How many of remaining 22 get to be built remains to be seen, but i would suggest it will be less than half, if that.

        1. The_Lorax Avatar
          The_Lorax

          Ok, but the 11 ruled out are all small capacity (under 112.5MW) so the bulk of the new coal-fired capacity (22 *large* power stations) is still going ahead. And you’d have to say some portion of the capacity that’s been cancelled will be replaced by gas. Japan (like Germany) is doing pretty poorly on the only number that matters. The UK is smashing it! https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/a45c0358d5a9e4a4981e1ec91bbabebaa7fd746556fcf11924cbc0c445619fba.png

        2. Joe Avatar
          Joe

          Thanks Giles

    2. Rod Avatar
      Rod

      Tokyo is about to get slammed by another typhoon.

      Maybe they can put two and two together and work out more coal burners will just make this a regular occurrence.

      “Severe Tropical Storm Jongdari is set to strike Japan this weekend with flooding rain and damaging winds.

      While currently well to the south of mainland Japan, Jongdari is expected to
      track northeastward in the coming days before turning westward this
      weekend and slamming the east coast of Honshu.

      Rough seas and high surf will batter the entire east coast of Japan from Friday through the weekend, creating hazardous conditions for shipping interests.Jongdari is expected to strengthen as it tracks toward Japan and achieves typhoon status prior to reaching the country.”

      1. Ralph Buttigieg Avatar
        Ralph Buttigieg

        Are you seriously suggesting if Japan didn’t burn coal they wouldn’t have any typhoons?

        1. Rod Avatar
          Rod

          Are you seriously suggesting you don’t understand the correlation between CO2, warmer oceans and more intense storm systems?

        2. heinbloed Avatar
          heinbloed

          ” Are you seriuosly …?”

          Me too.

      2. Joe Avatar
        Joe

        And Japan has just experienced record high summer temps and we saw the pictures of the recent flooding event. But hey, The Deniers are still out there and we’ve had a few of their scribbles in the pages of Renew Economy. The Science warned that more will more extremes in temps, storms and rainfall. Japan is getting a taste of all three in just one summer season.

    3. heinbloed Avatar
      heinbloed

      ” Japan is actually building a huge amount new coal-fired power stations.”

      Check the clowns magazine again and send them a red nose.

      https://asia.nikkei.com/Politics/Japan-says-no-to-high-emission-coal-power-plants

    4. David Osmond Avatar
      David Osmond

      Japan is also cancelling a huge number (3.6 GW) of those proposed coal power plants:

      https://www.renewable-ei.org/en/activities/column/20180723.html

      1. The_Lorax Avatar
        The_Lorax

        Adding 17GW in new coal, cancelling 3.6GW. Not helpful in getting the planet to zero emissions by mid-century.

        1. David Osmond Avatar
          David Osmond

          Agreed, but there’s no guarantee that all of that 17 GW will actually get built. And of that which does get built, does it end up increasing coal generation in Japan, or simply displace older or less efficient coal generation?

          1. The_Lorax Avatar
            The_Lorax

            No, but even replacing coal with better coal isn’t doing what’s required, which is 10-15% emissions reductions per year in developed countries. Just a reminder of the scale of the challenge… https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/1730fca0a4f4a420787cb2520a8c0195d32e909193dbeddbdeb7dbd7cd83ccb2.jpg

  4. phillyc Avatar
    phillyc

    https://endcoal.org/global-coal-plant-tracker/
    China has slowed from 80GW installed per year in 2006 and 2007 down to 37GW in 2017 and slowed even further to 12GW (Jan-July 2018). There has been a below trend 1.7GW decommissioned in Jan-July 2018.

    1. Calamity_Jean Avatar
      Calamity_Jean

      Well, that’s ungood. Switzerland is far enough south that it should put in a lot of solar on the east, west and south sides of its mountains. Every building with a southern exposure should have rooftop solar.

Get up to 3 quotes from pre-vetted solar (and battery) installers.