Electric vehicles and stationary energy – emerging possibilities

Nissan Leaf. Source: Nissan
Source: Nissan

I use an average of under 4 kWh/day in my all- electric home with a peak of about 9 kWh – and I could reduce that peak even more by further upgrading my home’s thermal performance.

An electric vehicle typically has a battery of 40 kWh to 100 kWh. Yet the ‘average’ daily distance travelled by an Australian car is less than 40km, requiring about 6 kWh.

So, emerging EV technology, such as that in the new Nissan Leaf, could provide both mobility and home energy for several days.

I could also drive my car to another electricity source, such as a public charger supplied by wind energy or pumped hydro energy storage, to recharge and run my home and car for even longer. The car’s battery could even be used to ‘export’ electricity to other buildings or to the grid.

I must admit to being bemused by the delay in recognising EVs as mobile energy storage systems.

And if an EV had a range extender engine (not the existing complex and heavy plug-in hybrid technology, but a small, lightweight, multi-fuel motor-generator; see for example bit.ly/TE-DMGT), it could use petrol or renewable fuels such as ethanol, methanol, hydrogen or biogas to enhance flexibility and provide backup energy.

Some time ago, I worked out that such a solution could cost-effectively generate up to 700 kWh/ year at lower cost than the annual connection charge for staying connected to the grid.

Maybe there is a potential business model for a truck with a large battery that could travel around, topping up home batteries in winter? This would allow people to go off-grid and save up to $400 annually on connection charges. Such a service could also ‘download’ excess electricity stored in a home battery or EV to other consumers.

I am not suggesting that solutions like these are here now or are the best options. But the reality is that disruptive business models and behind-the-meter solutions are emerging from left field at an accelerating rate.

These options cross traditional boundaries and potentially blindside people who think in terms of incremental change.

Investments in large energy projects that take years to implement (including large energy storage projects) or are protected by slow-moving regulatory systems and policies (often managed by policymakers captured by incumbents or their blinkered vision) are looking increasingly risky.

Change brings risk and opportunity. It can be a wild ride.

Energy network operators who, at present, benefit from generous guaranteed profits based on unrealistic asset valuations should be nervous. Their social licence to operate is fragile. They are lucky that few policy makers understand this or have the courage to call them out— so far.

Alan Pears, AM, is one of Australia’s best- regarded sustainability experts and is a senior industry fellow at RMIT University.. This article was first published as part of his regular column in Renew magazine,

Comments

3 responses to “Electric vehicles and stationary energy – emerging possibilities”

  1. Jon Avatar
    Jon

    As a recent purchaser of an EV (that doesn’t have V2H or V2G capabilities as standard) I’m interested in this as an option.

    To disconnect from the grid you also need a power source/storage solution for when the vehicle isn’t at home.

    The main advantage I see in this technology is allowing a home battery to be sized for covering power usage for a single day and utilising the vehicle battery for when there’s extended cloudy weather (most home RE systems are solar).

  2. RobertO Avatar
    RobertO

    Hi All,

    I am of the opinion that in 2021 – 2022 the value of the NSW grid will be written down in value. As BEV’s hit the numbers, as solar (or wind) in both business and households grows, as FF start to depart from the system (every 20 BEV’s is about 1 kWhr of FF pumping gone), the grid loses its value (the threat of grid disconnection grows).

    The naysayer will all deny every possible improvement and if possible will obstruct many things, but in the end VRE will prevail.

  3. Eric Avatar
    Eric

    Good idea, but you wouldn’t want to use a Nissan battery for this because they have a reputation for rapidly losing charging capacity. Until they produce BEV’s with a liquid rather than air cooled battery it is best to steer well clear.
    Hopefully all BEV’s will eventually be able to charge your home. It is a shame that Tesla hasn’t enabled this ability yet. Also, a Tesla Powerwall in Australia doesn’t work when the power goes off. What is the use of that!!

Get up to 3 quotes from pre-vetted solar (and battery) installers.