Confusion as Baird dumps renewable energy in ministerial reshuffle

New South Wales premier Mike Baird has raised concerns among the renewable energy industry after choosing to eliminate the portfolio of parliamentary secretary for renewable energy as part of his ministerial reshuffle following his poll win on the weekend.

The removal of the post was not announced and had people within and without government scratching their heads. The previous occupant of the role, Leslie Williams, is now minister for early childhood education.

Wind_turbine_-_toora

 

 

Rob Stokes – a strong advocate for renewable energy and community energy – has been promoted from environment to become minister for planning, which makes him the head of a “cluster” that includes the environment and local government ministries.

This appointment will be welcomed by the wind industry in particular, and probably solar as well, as it raises hopes that some of the restrictive planning laws could be eased. But it also hands Stokes a poisoned chalice of dealing with numerous controversial new coal mines and coal mine expansions.

In another move, the portfolio of energy minister Anthony Roberts, a leader of the party’s right faction, was expanded to include industry and resources. There is concern about what this means for gas development in the state, since industry will be an advocate. It is the opposite of what is happening in Queensland, where the energy and climate portfolios were combined.

There is speculation that the removal of the parliamentary secretary role may simply reflect the fact that not much is happening in NSW, particularly given the policy uncertainty at a national level as the federal Coalition seeks to wind back the renewable energy target by nearly half.

NSW has gained just a minor share of the large-scale wind farms built to date, although it has released a renewable energy master plan to try to get a greater share of investment should the federal policy ever give clarity to investors.

“It is troubling,” said one insider. Questions to the Premier’s office went unanswered.

The ministerial reshuffle did include some positives for the renewables industry. Pru Goward, the previous planning minister, has been shifted to mental health. She was a noted anti-wind campaigner, complaining to the ACT government about its plans to build wind farms near her electorate.

Another vocal anti-wind MP, Katrina Hodgkinson, the member for Burrinjuck (around Yass), lost her portfolio as primary ministries minister and is relegated to parliamentary secretary for southern NSW.

Stokes’ direct supervision of the environment ministry is taken by Mark Speakman, the member for Cronulla, who not only accepts the science of climate change, but says Australia should lead in doing something about it.

In his first speech to parliament in 2011, he said all available evidence pointed to man-made climate change. “We must loudly and unequivocally formulate environmental policy on the basis that most evidence points to human activity being the principal cause of potentially very significant climate change,” he said.

“That evidence could eventually turn out to be wrong. But I’d rather be safe than sorry. That of course does not mean that Australia or New South Wales should adopt policies that will simply drive polluting industries offshore and cripple our international competitiveness, with no discernible impact on global emissions.

“Ultimately a global solution is required. But so long as Australia remains one of the world’s highest per capita emitters of greenhouse gases, we will have little moral suasion when we tell China, India, Brazil and the like what they should be doing. Reducing our carbon footprint here in New South Wales of itself will make only a negligible difference to world emissions.

“But every bit we can do in New South Wales to reduce Australia’s emissions will help Australia’s diplomatic efforts on the world stage to reach a comprehensive world approach to the problem.”

Four years later, Speakman now has the chance to put rhetoric into practice.

Postscript: A spokesman for the premier later said in an email that renewable energy is the responsibly of the Environment Minister.

“This Government is committed to a secure, reliable, affordable and clean energy future for NSW households and businesses.
Renewable energy generation in NSW has almost doubled in the past six years,” the spokesman said.

“NSW has benefited  from more than $8 billion of investment in the industry since 2001 – predominantly in regional areas. vThere are more than 13,000 people employed in the renewable energy industry in NSW – mostly in regional areas.

“The NSW Government continues to support the national 20 per cent Renewable Energy Target (41,000 gigawatt hours).”

Comments

4 responses to “Confusion as Baird dumps renewable energy in ministerial reshuffle”

  1. Farmer Dave Avatar
    Farmer Dave

    So two out of the three Liberal state governments (NSW and Tasmania) say they want the 41,000 GWh RET maintained – publicly. What are they saying to the federal Government privately? Clearly not enough! Does anyone have any information about any actual lobbying on behalf of the RET by the NSW or Tasmanian governments?

    1. your local firefighter Avatar
      your local firefighter

      I wouldn’t hold your breath on State v Federal approaches to maintain the current RET. As I see it, in this coal dominated NSW electorate Climate Change and Large Scale Wind Power are behind all the deliberate hurdles NSW can serve up, combined with the fear; uncertainty and doubt promulgated by the Federal LNP with its mantra “coal is good for humanity”.

      Case in point; our project was cancelled seven weeks before the Federal Poll – 2013, two other large projects are stalled and now to suit the doubters’ hosts are selling into subdivision, a most desirable outcome as planned.

  2. wideEyedPupil Avatar
    wideEyedPupil

    Not much happening in RE is not a reason to ditch a RE Minister, it’s a time for them to step it up. They even have the ACT on hand to show them how it all works!

  3. john Avatar
    john

    The real problem is the Government owned transmission system over capitalised.
    This presents a problem as the expected load on the network did not materialise.
    At the time of commitment this was a reasonable and sensible undertaking to ensure our Eastern Network would cope with the expected peak load.
    The result has been an every increasing price for transmission for delivery of power.
    How to resolve this in a sensible way.
    The realistic situation is that the capital expend has to be written down.
    This presents a problem for the various state governments.
    I can fully understand the State Governments problem they wish to unload the Poles and Wires as soon as possible off their books at the highest price possible
    However just selling it with the 10% return on investment is not exactly a realistic or fair outcome.
    I honestly think the asset has to be looked at as a over capitalised asset and the real return on usage has to be within realistic lower rates of return.
    This is a monopoly service situation where our every day life would not function with this asset.
    As to RE; Australia which is blessed with perhaps some of the best resources in the world and some of the best researches; as per usual we do pretty dismally not at all unexpected; I am afraid.

Get up to 3 quotes from pre-vetted solar (and battery) installers.