Australia’s biggest coal state plans for life beyond coal | RenewEconomy

Australia’s biggest coal state plans for life beyond coal

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Campbell Newman let looose a rare, unscripted truth on Australia’s national policies when it comes to coal.

share
Two dozen ships anchored outside Gladstone harbour in 2008, waiting to load coal.
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The Conversation

Two dozen ships anchored outside Gladstone harbour in 2008, waiting to load coal.
Two dozen ships anchored outside Gladstone harbour in 2008, waiting to load coal.

 

We are in the coal business. If you want decent hospitals, schools and police on the beat we all need to understand that. – Queensland Premier Campbell Newman, June 2012.

It was a rare moment of unscripted truth in Australian politics, which summed up decades of national policy.

The Premier was responding to United Nations report on the health of the Great Barrier Reef, warning that it could be listed as a World Heritage site “in danger” unless Australia stepped up its protection of the reef, particularly from increased port development. (The World Heritage Committee is due to discuss it again at a meeting in June this year.)

Newman was not just articulating Liberal National Party policy; keeping Australia in the coal business has also been core to Labor’s economic policy for many decades, going back to the “no regrets” approach of the Hawke/Keating years.

Australia has massive coal resources, as this 2012 map shows. Geoscience Australia, CC BY
Australia has massive coal resources, as this 2012 map shows. Geoscience Australia, CC BY

It’s not hard to see why the bipartisan consensus on coal persists. Coal is thebiggest export earner for Queensland and New South Wales, and our second biggest nationally, worth A$41 billion in 2012.

So here’s the surprising part. Over the past year, Newman has been asking Queenslanders to come up with a 30-year vision for the state, “beyond politics, and beyond the next 10 elections. It will be a genuine reflection of our collective aspirations for the future.”

Nearly 80,000 people have had their say – and in the draft plan currently under review by the state government, coal doesn’t rate a mention.

By the people, for the people

The Queensland government’s Queensland Plan is significant because it’s among the most extensive public consultation processes ever undertaken by an Australian or state government. A leading American planning consultant and adviser to the Premier, Steven Ames, describes the effort being made to hear views from across the state as a “virtuous circle”:

Bottom line, the more engaged the public, and the more aware the government of public perceptions, the more effective and long-lasting outcomes that can be expected. – Ames, correspondence with the author.

The draft Queensland Plan.
The draft Queensland Plan.

Launched early last year, there have been major summits in Mackay and Brisbane, dozens of workshops and hundreds of meetings across the state, as well as online surveys and discussions, all feeding into a draft 30-year plan. The final plan will bereleased in mid-2014.

 

Subtitled “Our working draft created by Queenslanders, for Queensland”, the 44-page draft plan distills all that community consultation into nine key subjects: education, community, regions, economy, health and well-being, environment, people, infrastructure, and governance.

More thorough than any public opinion poll, the draft Queensland Plan shows that Queenslanders want regional development and livable communities, but importantly they want these to be innovative, sustainable, and supportive of emerging industries.

Surprisingly, “coal” is nowhere to be found in the draft Queensland Plan. Instead, people have expressed a clear preference for developing agriculture, ecotourism, education, research and development, and alternative energy.

Among the top 35 goals outlined are that “We protect the environment” and “We invest in and adopt sustainable and renewable solutions”. Asked “What does success look like?” in achieving that latter goal, Queenslanders have said “Renewable energy will be the norm.”

Envisaging a different future

For so many people from such a coal-reliant state to envisage a generational shift away from coal is remarkable.

Coal mines operating in Queensland (shown in red) and coal deposits (shown in yellow). Map created using interactive tools on 13 March 2014.
Coal mines operating in Queensland (shown in red) and coal deposits (shown in yellow). Map created using interactive tools on 13 March 2014.

But it mirrors some other shifts in public sentiment and behaviour, in which ordinary Australians have moved ahead of politicians – sometimes catching federal and state governments off-guard.

Even a few years ago, who would have confidently predicted the recent trends in rooftop solar power? Certainly not major power companies like AGL, which havereported hits to their profits as more Australians try to control their rising power bills by going solar. Between March 2011 and the end of 2013, the proportion of Australian homes with solar panels more than doubled from 7.5% in March 2011 to 16%, representing more than 3 million people.

However, imagining a future without significant coal export revenues will be harder for political leaders from both major parties.

For instance, even while the Gillard government was introducing a carbon tax, it went to great lengths to reassure its heartland about the future for coal, with Climate Change Minister Greg Combet declaring in 2011: “I can assure coal miners that their industry has a bright future under a carbon price.”

Will politicians listen?

Campbell Newman has shown himself to be a commendably unorthodox political leader in conceiving and championing such an inclusive, forward-thinking process as the Queensland Plan.

Campbell Newman invites Queenslanders to have their say on the state’s future.

So now the question is whether both sides of politics will heed the sentiment so strongly articulated in this bold 30-year community vision for Australia’s leading coal state.

Ultimately, it is a vision that neither the Liberal National Party nor Labor can ignore.

The alternative, as the people have rightly identified, leaves us dependent on the hope that Asia’s major coal consumers will never clean up their own industries. It’s a risky strategy, asmore analysts are warning, particularly as our region’s economic powerhouse and main Australian market, China, has announced its own “war on pollution” – much of it generated by burning coal.

 

Source: The Conversation. Reproduced with permission.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

6 Comments
  1. Sid Abma 6 years ago

    What if coal could be consumed as clean as natural gas. What if natural gas could be consumed to be as efficient as solar?
    The world needs the “new” renewable energy sources, but it also needs a lot of energy. Energy produced so it is available at the outlet. Where did it come from? To most people- where it comes from does not matter, as long as it is there when it is needed.
    When the sun goes down and the wind dies down ~ Who wants to sit in the dark and wait for…………..? Nobody
    Next goal. Show the world that the fossil fuels in today’s technology can be consumed to be as efficient as the other renewable energies, and in some cases even a better fuel. Can solar or wind energy produce Water? Is water important for our world economics?

    Increased Energy Efficiency is Important. Grab onto it and make it work!

    • Bob_Wallace 6 years ago

      What if jackasses could fly?

      • Sid Abma 6 years ago

        Then I would suggest you wear a hat and a rain slicker. Who knows what might happen when this herd passes over you.

    • RobS 6 years ago

      Thats a ridiculous number of what if with no technical solutions to any of them. Your point about the sun going down and the wind stopping is so tiresome and has been debunked to death through a combination of demand response, technological diversity, geographical distribution and storage. As to your questions about water…I don’t even know what point you are trying to make because fossil fuel thermal generators are voracious consumers of water and if the gargantuan gigialitres of water saved by transitioning to renewables is not enough then yes renewables can be used to run desalination plants to make more water.

    • Alen 6 years ago

      Wind and solar cannot produce water, but neither can coal or gas. As you say the sun doesn’t always shine and wind doesn’t always blow, but it does the majority of time in the right places (and there’s plenty of research that is done before a particular site is given the go-ahead) and for those times were it doesn’t, have back-up generators (already built) or battery storage to fill-in gaps, but also VERY important to note, that the idea of centralized generators are a FF theory and by having multiple generators and technologies in a decentralized network you either decrease or totally eliminate (as much as any generator is able to that is) the risk of blackouts.
      P.S. if you are seeking a renewable technology providing both base power and desalinated water check out Carnagie’s CETO technology. Considering over 80% of Australia’s population is within 100km of the coast it only makes sense to have this in as many places as possible.

  2. JohnRD 6 years ago

    The Qld coal industry is responsible for a very small percentage of Qld jobs. Worse still, many of these jobs are quality of life hostile FIFO jobs. Even worse still, many of the coal jobs are engineering and construction jobs that disappear whenever there is a slow down these jobs disappear. At the moment, the coal industry in Qld is shedding jobs like it is going out of fashion.
    So why would any thinking Queenslander see the coal industry as a logical part of a good future for Qld?

Comments are closed.

Get up to 3 quotes from pre-vetted solar (and battery) installers.