Reality dawns on network operators: Consumers don’t like them much

How do we solve a problem like modern electricity supply? That was one the major themes of the conference staged by Australia’s Energy Networks Association in Sydney on Thursday. And a big part of the answer lies in the consumer.

As Vince Graham, chief of the group of (currently) government-owned NSW Networks, put it: “We’ll soon find ourselves in a regulatory environment of capped revenue and declining consumption.

“Encouraging consumers to use your product in an era of decline seems to me worthy of a little more consideration,” he said.

“I’m constantly amazed,” Graham told the audience of mainly power supply and infrastructure companies, “by our collective ability to punish consumers.”

network queensland

Currently, added Graham, Australia’s energy market is geared to create winners and losers. The difference now, though, is that while the winners will be happy, the losers just might quit the grid.

And he’s not just talking about high electricity prices. What Graham and his fellow network operators – and later various utility executives – seem to be acknowledging is that the energy delivery paradigm has changed.

It’s not that customers are more informed about their energy supply – many are not, and don’t particularly want to be.

And it’s not just the bill shock: that big increase in power bills, without much to show from it. It’s that consumers can now do something about it.

Driven by the rapidly changing metrics of technology markets – namely the advent of affordable solar, and now energy storage – consumers have gone from being, effectively, ratepayers, to being players in the market, who can and will decide if they use a particular electricity service or not.

And they might need some convincing, or so it seems.

“The message is pretty clear,” said Ergon Energy’s Glenn Walden, “As an industry, they don’t really like us much.”

“The customer’s giving us feedback that the world’s moving past you guys, and we don’t see you guys as a part of it. We need to make a connection with the customer, and say: ‘we get you, and we can help you get it.

“We need to shift from our focus on the network, to what’s going on with customers and at the edge of the grid.

Merryn York, CEO of Powerlink in Queensland, added: “We need to make sure that people want to use our product – that we’re not on the nose.

And the “product” needs now to be as diverse as the customers. For a start, the networks and utilities concede, you can virtually forget about owning the house.

In the urban residential sector now, the consensus is that it is all about encouraging customers to look at the technologies that will help reduce their power consumption, rather than obscuring that path, and working out a way to deliver these services in a way that will also benefit the grid and deliver revenue.

As for regional customers, according to the CEO of CitiPower and Powercorp in Victoria, Tim Rourke, networks like his are now developing advanced sales forces to try to secure more business.

“We need to engage with customers to see what their needs are,” said Rourke. “It comes down to people’s choices.”

Comments

7 responses to “Reality dawns on network operators: Consumers don’t like them much”

  1. suthnsun Avatar
    suthnsun

    Delivering ultra low emissions power to consumers as a matter of course would be the first step to satisfy the ‘ progressive mainstream’ consumer. In the final analysis it may be all that is really required for the majority of those.

    1. Ken Dyer Avatar
      Ken Dyer

      Exactly, it is about time the coal burners were retired. Until then, not one of the big operators will be successful.

  2. Engineer Malcolm Avatar
    Engineer Malcolm

    I’ll believe it when I see it in their actions, not just more idle talk.

  3. David K Clarke Avatar
    David K Clarke

    Could it be that the energy industry is starting to look at the situation rationally at last? Thinking long-term and not just of next year’s profits?

  4. Chris Fraser Avatar
    Chris Fraser

    Some thoughts emerge while violins play. The grid had a traditional role of passing energy one-way. It could only be one-way because it was so dumb. Now technology exists to make it smarter. There should be no more reason to be dismissive of PV, because now we know DNSPs can prevent portending grid issues allegedly caused by PV, even though PV was not even saturating the grid enough to be the problem. The utility of the grid is now about to grow tenfold because now distributed sources can pass energy in many directions at once. Surely this concept has been a problem in the past, but in future maybe not so. Distributed providers want to grow like you. To make sure that a grid is being run to benefit users, DNSPs should ensure that centralised generators (who naturally use the grid as tool to send energy one-way and charge high network availability charges) should have no vested interest in grids. Thank you.

  5. Leigh Ryan Avatar
    Leigh Ryan

    Since these are Government owned producers can i suggest that instead of seeing the energy market as a revenue source they should go back to day one and see the industry as it was always mean’t to be, a low cost service provision for the benefit of it’s consumers, imagine the competitive edge the state could give to industry and agriculture if it was able to provide the state with the lowest cost energy in the southern hemisphere, of course that would stimulate the economy right across the state and provide for thousands of new jobs, now we couldn’t have that could we.

    1. Jacob Avatar
      Jacob

      Exactly. The grid in QLD and NSW are still government owned. So they could have a policy of not ripping off their voters. And those states could then attract a lot of manufacturing.

      Hell, they could even have a policy of owing 51% of Sydney Airport, and then expand the policy of not ripping of their voters to include voters who fly.

Get up to 3 quotes from pre-vetted solar (and battery) installers.