Home » Commentary » NSW solar tariffs cut again, as regulator approves gas price rises

NSW solar tariffs cut again, as regulator approves gas price rises

rooftop solar

The pricing regulator in the Australian state of New South Wales has slashed the recommended (but voluntary) level of feed-in tariffs for rooftop solar, while at the same time rubber stamping an increase in gas prices in the state of up to 20 per cent.

IPART (the Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal) announced on Wednesday that its draft determination for solar feed in tariffs for 2014/15 recommended a retailer contribution of just 5.3c/kWh for solar energy exported back into the grid.

This is down from 6.6c/kWh in the current year – a fall that IPART says reflects the likely removal of the carbon price – while its “benchmark range” is cut to 5.0c/kWh to 9.6c/kWh at peak times.

This compares to recommended retail tariffs of around 28c/kWh and peak tariffs of more than 52c/kWh. The FiT is entirely voluntary, meaning that retailers do not have to pay anything for exports back into the grid. Some utilities insist that commercial scale installations have a mechanism that prevents exports back into the grid.

ipart draft solar FiT

The determination by IPART represents the lowest FiT recommended by pricing regulators in Australia, and contrasts dramatically with regulatory rulings in the US, where in the state of Minnesota, for instance, the solar tariff is nearly as high as the retail tariff.

As we discussed in our story “Are Australian solar households getting ripped off?“, in Australia the state pricing regulators are only concerned with the impact on retailers and the so-called “avoidable” costs of delivery – the cost of wholesale generation, transmission losses, and some minor ancillary services.

But the regulators in Minnesota – and other US states – take into account not just the avoided fuel cost, but various transmission and distribution capacity costs, avoided generation capacity costs and, most tellingly, the avoided environmental cost.

The position of state-based regulators on feed-in tariffs has caused the solar industry to consider establishing “peer-to-peer” pricing mechanisms, and to call for changes to the way electricity tariffs are structured.

The decision came on the same day that IPART granted price rises of nearly 20 per cent for gas supplies in the state – a decision that will inflate household gas bills by up to $225 a year.

The rise was blamed on the anticipated price surge caused by the start of exports from the giant LNG terminals in Queensland, which is pushing domestic gas prices to parity with the international market.

This is expected to result in a doubling or trebling in wholesale gas prices in Australia. This is likely to flow through to electricity bills in NSW, as it has already done in Queensland, where the gas component was the biggest single cause of rising electricity bills for the coming year.

The rising price of gas is also forcing gas-fired generators out of the market because they can no longer compete with coal. Many gas fired generators are being written down in value, and are being re-assigned to act as peak load generators rather than base load or intermediate peakers.

Comments

7 responses to “NSW solar tariffs cut again, as regulator approves gas price rises”

  1. Alexander Dudley Avatar
    Alexander Dudley

    Environmentally, this country is going backwards at a staggering rate as far as policy is concerned. We can only hope that such price rises and low tariffs will encourage solar/storage leasing companies to be welcomed into the market, as electricity prices go up and up. The death spiral is about to begin.

  2. John P Avatar
    John P

    Feed in tariffs are now so low as to be irevelant.
    But with the gas price hike now inevitable, it is time for consumers to opt for large rooftop solar installations which can do all household jobs at low cost.
    Gas can be ignored and a small fortune saved.

  3. juxx0r Avatar
    juxx0r

    Along with a daily supply charge of between 78.1 cents and 137.269 cents. NSW is signalling the big finger and suggesting that all their residential customers pick up some batteries and cut the cable.

  4. Les Johnston Avatar
    Les Johnston

    Thanks for informed response to the IPART deal in NSW. IPART appears to display a bias towards propping up the fossil coal industry. The time for roof top solar owners to act on mass to prepare for joint action to obtain a fair price is another consideration which might be explored. Is IPART suggesting that a localised spot coal fired power station should be paid just 5.5c/kWH? Is this another way to suggest that electricity retailers margin need to be increased just as it has done so with gas prices?

    1. wideEyedPupil Avatar
      wideEyedPupil

      Yes it would be great if the regulations permitted for solar owners to form a consortia of generators and bit that energy back into the grid. With utility scale storage around the corner that’s just what will be possible.

  5. Les Johnston Avatar
    Les Johnston

    If solar roof owners formed a company called say “distributed generators” would they be eligible to bid for peak power on the energy market and then feed local energy storage for non peak times? IT systems would be used on localised PV to switch systems in and out of the market.

  6. CoreyAnder Avatar
    CoreyAnder

    It seems to me that it is time for a group such as Solar Citizens to serve as a vehicle to aggregate the power of all people with solar who are connected to the grid.

    The amount of electricity being fed into the grid along with the reductions to consumption from the grid make solar owners a significant player in the electricity system. However, as they are not yet organised effectively, this power remains latent.

    The introduction of storage by solar owners allowing them to go off grid may not be the best form of investment or use of resources for us as a society. The grid exists and was paid for by us all and should be used for best economic effect. Those of us who would like to see the most efficient and cost effective renewable sources of electricity such as solar thermal with storage, wind, wave, geothermal etc understand that the grid is necessary for these forms to be used efficiently.

    It is possible that if significant numbers of solar owners adopt storage and go off grid then those users remaining on the grid because storage is not viable for them will be left with an unaffordable option.

    We need an independent analysis of what the grid should look like into the future that has a growing number of renewable sources and a diminishing number of fossil fuel sources. There is no escaping the fact that renewables are becoming cheaper, distributed energy is here to stay, solar storage may allow a significant portion of users to go off grid, gas prices are going up and up and carbon pollution is causing extremely expensive climate change (that will require ever greater amounts of energy to either mitigate or cope with).

    While some may celebrate the death spiral of fossil fuel energy companies we’ll likely be throwing the baby out with the bath water if the grid is compromised as well.

    It’s time for us to act as a community with common and not competing interests. Solar owners should stand up for the best interests of the entire community using all of the legal, political and social tools available . (Unlike the fossil fuel companies who are addicted to their own self interest (profit).)

    Join Solar Citizens (or similar group) and let’s use this power.

Get up to 3 quotes from pre-vetted solar (and battery) installers.