Belectric unveils first battery storage facility at large-scale PV plant

PV Magazine

Energy_Storage_Belectric_67eb632813
The solar plant went live in 2011. Now, thanks to a battery storage system, the PV plant can not only generate power but also provide operating reserve power just like a conventional power plant. Belectric  

This large-scale battery storage system, the first to be installed at a large PV farm, is set to put the solar park’s operator on a equal footing with conventional power plants. The lead-acid batteries installed at the part are designed to provide primary operating reserve to the high-voltage transmission network.

Bernhard Beck is one step closer to his goal. “We’re now on an equal footing with conventional power plant operators,” says Belectric’s founder and general director at the official ribbon-cutting ceremony for the so-called Energy Buffer Unit at the Alt Daber solar power plant.

The battery storage system makes it possible for the plant to feed primary operating reserve power into the 110 kV high-voltage distribution network to which the solar power plant is connected. That is an exception, as most solar power plants are connected to either medium-voltage or low-voltage networks.

“You’re always hearing the claim that solar power plants can’t do this. Now we’re proving that opposite is true,” said Beck. Vattenfall, which was also present at the ribbon cutting, markets the operating reserve power.

Beck sees this as PV’s contribution to the energy economy and also as justification for the rapid expansion of solar power. The project fits nicely into Beck’s portfolio; in the past he has equipped solar power plants with systems that were capable of providing reactive power to the network: not only during the day but at night as well. Within a matter of seconds, primary operating reserve energy compensates for rapid fluctuations in electricity supply and demand, ensuring stable voltage and frequency within the network.

The primary operating reserve power is billed separately from power traded on the electricity exchange and is paid for out of network operation fees (see the energy market glossary from Energy Brainpool, pv magazine September 2014).

In other words, the new storage system is not intended to provide solar power generated during the day, at night.

Premium reserve power from batteries

Beck emphasizes that the battery storage system can not only provide operating reserve power but, with its reaction time of less than a second, it can do so faster than conventional power plants, which until now have been solely responsible for supplying the reserve.

This, said Beck, saves additional costs. “If you can react quickly to changes in frequency, you don’t have to hold as much operating power in reserve as you do with units that react more slowly,” Beck explains, which is why he’s convinced that these battery storage systems already make good sense for the energy economy. This is particularly true as increasing numbers of renewable power plants are added to the grid, which will create more rapid fluctuations.

Although it makes sense in principle, under the current regulatory scheme the new storage system can only be operated profitably because it was partially subsidized. “For this system to be financially viable under these conditions, costs have to come down by about a third.”

That may soon be the case, however. After all, Alt Daber was a pilot project in which Belectric “learned a great deal.” Under the right conditions — an inexpensive grid connection, for instance — it may very well be possible to fund subsequent installations with market revenue alone. Alt Daber also takes advantage of the synergy effect that the storage system can tap into the high-voltage network.

Storage systems are currently at a regulatory disadvantage, though, as operators of pumped-storage power plants are often quick to point out. The operators of such plants are treated as consumers and thus have to pay fees and surcharges for the electrical energy they store. Then they have to pay the same costs again when the storage system is discharged.

Currently, an active discussion is going on among experts about how much primary operating reserve energy is needed and how it can be provided. Agora Energiewende studied a number of scenarios in an energy storage study aimed at analyzing when and how much storage capacity is necessary. The primary load-balancing energy market in the transmission network ignored them, however, because “it is such a small amount of energy (some 5 to 600 MW in Germany and 3 GW in Europe).”

With its Alt Daber project, Vattenfall is on board as the marketer of the operating reserve power. That should be seen as a strong indicator that transmission system operators see a market for operating reserve energy from battery storage systems.

Belectric is taking a different technical route than Wemag and Younicos, for instance, which opened a large lithium-ion battery storage system not directly connected to a solar or wind power plant for marketing primary operating reserve power.

Lead-acid battery with a high operational voltage

Unlike Wemag and Younicos, Belectric has opted for lead-acid batteries due to their lower overall cost. According to Beck, the project optimized other costs as well and selected a high operational voltage of 1500 V for the batteries, which to his knowledge are “the first-ever” with this voltage.

The high operational voltage requires less cabling and thus saves copper while reducing the number of inverters. Doubling the operational voltage reduces storage costs by around half, he said. The battery storage system has a feed-in capacity of 800 kW and a capacity of 948 kWh. The Alt Daber power plant has a capacity of 68 MW and was connected to the grid in 2011.

Belectric also sells the Energy Buffer Unit separately. It is supplied in a container weighing some 36 t and is being marketed both domestically and abroad.

Source: PV Magazine. Reproduced with permission.

 

 

Comments

7 responses to “Belectric unveils first battery storage facility at large-scale PV plant”

  1. john Avatar
    john

    I do not see lead acid as a storage option due to DOD issues
    Flow batteries of which there is a large number of companies doing the ground work will win through.
    Some will fail this is without question because they will not be able to commercialise the research.
    Once flow batteries get into the market for small storage then with volume manufacture we will see the usual plummet in price leading to wide take up the end result will be that Flow Batteries will just be as common as PV on the roof.

    1. Miles Harding Avatar
      Miles Harding

      I was also surprised to see them using Lead-Acid for this application. Apart from the live cycle issues, the battery isn’t very efficient, but is it is cheap.

      I have been interested in flow batteries for years, there have been numerous demonstration units built, sometimes into the MWh range, but no widespread application yet. The vanadium type is also not particularly efficiency at about 80%, which makes it about the same as pumped hydro.

      At a household level, re-arranging energy consuming activities (washing, baking, charging the car etc) to be better aligned with the availability of energy is a lot cheaper than batteries will ever be.

      At a community scale, the same re-engineering of activities must occur in order to reduce the amount of storage needed to a practical level. Perhaps a new tariff structure that penalises users for consuming electricity from storage system is needed.

      1. john Avatar
        john

        True energy efficiency measures are the low hanging fruit for instance people are still installing Halogen Lights where as LED ‘s are so better.

        Getting onto flow batteries please have a look at

        http://www.energystoragenews.org/

        Why would you penalise consumers who use storage?
        The use of storage just like the use of PV will supress the price of power to all consumers.
        The amount of money flowing into this area is rather surprising and without a doubt will be of benefit to all in the not so distant future actually now some distributors are installing storage devices to reduce their costs instead of starting up diesel sets which are very expensive.

        1. Miles Harding Avatar
          Miles Harding

          I didn’t complete the thought there, john.

          My idea was to mimic the same costs I see from my own off-grid system, where storage battery has to be provisioned for the misaligned loads making for a larger battery. The cost for this battery store should be born by those that use it, as is the case at home.

          The more demand we have in sympathy for the renewable generation systems, the less battery capacity is required. This is much like peak period pricing the we already have, where consumers are rewarded for accommodating the power supply’s properties.

          1. john Avatar
            john

            miles
            from what I see it appears that flow batteries; especially because they can cope with half charged being charged and being discharged; look better than Li-Ion batteries which can not cope with this situation.
            The cost point will tell the story, the first company to build a income stream by supplying a storage and control system at a price that is clearly advantageous to consumers will have a very large market world wide.

  2. Wartsila Avatar
    Wartsila

    Let’s bring some clarity . There are primary, secondary and teritary reserve in a power system. The difference among them is how fast the output is increased/decreased . Primary reserves act very fast ( millisecond to second) and is done by any thermal power plant in automatic via AGC. Any running power plant in the system can provide this service. In some countries such ancillary service is either supplied for free or paid peanuts . There is no real advantage in delivering this ancillary service with the battery because for a normal power plant the penalties in efficiency gain /lost are almost non existent . Secondary reserves act in minutes from the frequency deviation to free primary reserve
    . Here you need special power plants that can ramp up in hundred of MWs from 0 in few minutes. gas engines are very good at this , aero GT can also do but not so as fast and efficiently as the former. Batteries can’t be used because while they can rump very fast they can’t delivery the amounts of energy needed . Then there are the tertiary reserve used to free secondary reserve, they start around 1h from the frequency deviation if this has not been restored yet ( I.e power station trip)

    1. suthnsun Avatar
      suthnsun

      I wonder why the FERC are paying a lot more than peanuts for this service? I also wonder why there are so many investing so much to produce the millisecond type service? (Via various battery storage systems)

Get up to 3 quotes from pre-vetted solar (and battery) installers.