rss
14

Tony Abbott moves to send renewables to the never never

Print Friendly

So, here we go again. The conservative government that brought renewable energy in Australia to a complete standstill nearly a decade ago (bringing the then renewable energy target to a halt because it was “too successful”) and forced developers to pack their bags and head overseas, is back to its old tricks. Same batty cast, same batty channel.

The Abbott government’s confirmation on Wednesday that the budget for the Australian Renewable Energy Agency would be slashed is worse news than it seems – even in the context of the carbon price repeal, and the dismantling of the Climate Commission, the Climate Change Authority and the Clean Energy Finance Corporation.

The total amount of funding for ARENA has been slashed from its original budget of $3.2 billion to $2.5 billion, which much of this backloaded into the latter years of the next decade.

But the real impact is what happens in the next few years. The funding for this year is maintained, but the funding for the next two years (2014/15 and 2015/16) is barely one-fifth of what it was assumed to be by ARENA, even just a few weeks ago.

us-renewables-271x300

No thanks, we’re Australian.

And it is not safe to make any assumptions about funding further out – because it will be just as easy for this or any other government to make further cuts to meet whatever budget crises they have managed to create.

It is not yet clear which programs will be affected and how. But the immediate impact, say renewable energy insiders, is that the development of key technologies, such as large-scale solar, could be severely curtailed. That’s because funding from the likes of ARENA and the CEFC is crucial to unlocking finance for first-of-their-kind projects.

The irony of this deliberate slowing-down of the progress in utility-scale solar PV – which is destined to catch wind energy on costs within a few years – is that more wind farms will likely be developed if the renewable energy target stays as it is.

But, and it is a very big but … that won’t please the backbenchers, and some of the front benchers for that matter, in the Abbott government. Nor it will please influential shock jock Alan Jones, at whose altar Abbott craves to sit. So the next task is to neuter the RET.

That has effectively happened already, because the new government insists on holding another review – a decision that has put virtually all new investment on hold. The scope of the government’s ambitions to curtail renewables will be revealed in an issues paper that the government is due to release in early December.

But it seems clear that, as most other international governments are scaling up their renewable targets, Australia will move the other way, determined to follow the mantra of the fossil-fuel industry’s pin-up boy Bjorn Lomborg and try and stuff the renewable energy genie back into the bottle by limiting supporting funds to R&D. Barmy as they are, such ideas have only one purpose, to extend the shelf life of incumbent coal and gas assets.

Large-scale solar PV is not the only technology that will feel the impact of the ARENA funding cut. The Clean Energy Council says the deprivation of funds will also hurt emerging technologies such as solar thermal, marine energy, geothermal and energy storage.

The policy environment in Australia is now so bad that renewable energy companies are considering packing up and leaving. “I’m looking for a new industry; shame after 20 years in this one,” emailed one insider.

The CEC agreed. “The proposed changes to ARENA’s funding would mean that many renewable energy companies will consider moving offshore, where support for renewable energy innovation is both stronger and more stable,” deputy CEO Kane Thornton said in a statement.

The two tables below reveal the situation.

On the left are the original budget estimates, and updates provided in ARENA’s annual report that was released just a few weeks ago.

The second table is what is revealed in the Abbott government’s carbon price repeal legislation. Funds from ARENA are being appropriated to help repay some of the $7 billion deficit created by Abbott’s vow to “axe the tax.”

The cuts mean that, for the next four years out to 2016-2017, ARENA has only $200 million in uncommitted funding – that is a reduction of more than two thirds from $635 million.

The one positive impact is that ARENA still has substantial funds uncommitted in this financial year, and because this is not expected be rolled over if the funds are not committed, then ARENA will likely move swiftly to finalise these funding commitments in the next 6 months.

Screen Shot 2013-11-13 at 7.22.50 pm Screen Shot 2013-11-13 at 7.22.40 pm

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The calls for the Abbott government to scrap the RET altogether have been intensifying this week, particularly in The Australian. Several commentators have had a go, but none distinguish themselves by their ignorance as the column penned by Alan Moran, from Abbott’s favourite think-tank, the Institute of Public Affairs.

Moran’s comments are entirely predictable, and consistent with his past contributions: he told the Clean Energy Council annual conference last year that he expected the energy market of 2050 to look exactly like it did 50 years ago. But some of his more absurd claims are worth pointing out. So here are a couple of them:

Moran: Overall, renewable requirements add about 40 per cent to the wholesale electricity cost.

RE: No, actually renewables subtract from the wholesale price, because the well-documented merit order effect forces prices down. Were it not for the carbon price, wholesale prices in Australia, and in high renewables countries such as Germany, are at a record lows, and these are at least partly reflected in consumer bills.

Moran: Wind generation costs are at least $100 a megawatt hour, compared with less than $40 a megawatt hour for coal, the predominant source of electricity. There are also higher network and back-up costs.

RE: No, wind generation costs at the best wind farms are around $80/MWh. The wholesale cost of electricity, even after the dampening effect of renewables, from the coal-dominated grid that is passed on to consumers is around $90/MWh. That’s because some coal can be produced at $40/MWh, but coal-fired power stations rely on more expensive gas and other peaking to meet demand. This lifts the wholesale price higher. Coal fired power stations rely on this premium from peak demand because they have hocked themselves to the eyeballs in debt and rely on this premium to meet interest payments. There are no higher network and back-up costs required for wind energy, even in South Australia which has 27 per cent capacity.

Moran: Rooftop solar facilities are cheaper and receive less favourable regulatory treatment. Nonetheless, their electricity-generating costs and grid connections, subsidised by commercial electricity generators, makes rooftop solar at least five times more expensive than coal.

RE: No, rooftop solar facilities are not cheaper than wind, but they compete with the retail cost of electricity, not the wholesale cost. The additional costs created by solar are minimal, and households can generate solar electricity for between 12c/kWh and 18c/kWh, compared to their coal-fired connection of 28c/kWh to 32/kWh. If generators, utilities, their advisors and commentators like Moran don’t understand that metric, then they don’t know what’s going to hit them.

Moran: Beneficiaries would argue that terminating the renewable subsidies would constitute sovereign risk and adversely affect investment generally. But we are already seeing previously guaranteed income streams from overseas renewable schemes facing early termination. No investor can reasonably expect a subsidy to prevail for 15 years and there would be few precedents for a government committing its successors to 20 years of worthless expenditure.

RE: Except, of course, coal-fired generators that get subsidised supply for decades from coal mines; nuclear plants that rely on government subsidies for 35 years; and diesel suppliers that get long-term subsidies for remote generation.

Moran: No longer is it seriously maintained that renewables, with modest initial support, will become competitive with conventional supplies in a few years. It also has become clear that the world will not undertake carbon dioxide abatement measures comparable to those of Australia, hence any domestic measures have a trivial effect.

RE: You ought to wake up and read wider. Wind is competitive with new-build fossil fuels in many countries, is competitive with existing plant in some, and peaking gas plants in the US are being dumped in favour of solar.

RenewEconomy Free Daily Newsletter

Share this:

  • Andrew Richards

    Another great job of dismantling arguments from the IPA. Reading stories penned by the likes of Alan Moran would be quite funny if the stakes weren’t so high. The fact is when looking at the cost buildup of a typical retail electricity bill you would need a magnifying glass to find the cost of LRET.

    Andrew Richards
    Pacific Hydro

  • CoreyAnder

    Abbott and his fellow old fossils make me want to weep. I wonder how Mr Turnbull is feeling.

    • wideEyedPupil

      I think he be feeling like it’s time for a bit of succession planning in the Liberal Party. Problem is it will take years for the negative effects to materials in the publics eyes so they back their self-centred mentor in Tone.

  • Mike Moran

    Shamed to share the same last name as this bloke..

  • Gongite

    The poor quality of arguments from the vested interests and the ‘independent’ think tanks they fund is breathtaking! The fact that Tony Abbott accepts and repeats such arguments, and cites them as a reason to dismantle current climate policy suggests that he is equally in the pocket of the same vested interests.

    It makes me feel physically unwell to think about all the great ideas and investments and jobs in renewable energy that will be destroyed under this government, not to mention the effects on the climate. Thank you Giles and RE for drawing attention to what is happening, though it must be grim work.

    • Phil of Brisbane

      As a retired climatologist, the attacks by this disgusting Government on our environment and climate not only make me feel physically unwell, but white hot with rage!!! These deniosaurs, led by Typhoon Tony are literally threatening my children’s future well-being… ! Renewable is doable… We do it now or we do it hard!

      • Gongite

        Totally with you Phil! Turning out to the national climate rally this Sunday will help send a message. Joining the divestment campaign wlli also help. As many have said, climate change can’t be tackled by the actions of individuals – we also need governmental and institutional actions too. And unfortunately the Abbott, and Harper, governments seem to be part of a cabal determined NOT to take the require action. BUT – lots of individuals can influence institutional and this is exactly what we need to help make happen now…So: to the barricades!!!

  • Richard Hayes

    Markets can get ugly. Soon, one or more large investor (IFM Investors??) will fund a large amount of solar and or energy efficency equipment. Two years latter, all the of the energy companies shares will fall as much as the falls of E.on and RWE (Down 80%).

    The only other industry I can think-of that is behaving with such wilful igornace is the Newspapers. The media has had 20 years to change their business models and can not. The utilities will have less than five years.

  • Robert Johnston

    just been surfing seek.com.au. Top article Giles. Good to see at least part of the media covering these changes – for some reason I could not find it in the Australian.

    • http://ffggippsland.blogspot.com/ Blair Donaldson

      That would be because The Australian prefers to deal with fantasy rather than reality. Uncle Rupert demands it.

  • johnnewton

    Are you sure there isn’t a second ‘o’ in Mr Moran’s name?

  • Pedro

    We all knew that an Abbot government has no love of clean energy, but I am horrified at the religious zeal he is taking in wrecking all sorts of CO2 and climate change policy that took 20 years to achieve very modest outcomes.

    Renew economy is a great place for up to date info on the RE sector and climate change issues. The forum is excellent for debate and the exchange of idea’s. If you are a person that broadly agrees with the tone and issues raised by RE then it’s time to get politically serious to counter Abbott and the fossil fuel lobby. We have to start engaging the people who either have no opinion or don’t care and try to convince them of the real threat of climate change with the same sort of zeal. It appears to me to be the great ideological war of our time. The climate deniers versus the rest of the world and its a pretty good guess the climate deniers are pretty much paid off by fossil interests.

    Maybe we have to start playing by different rules because a rational debate is not working. Divestment is one of the best idea’s so far, but I think there are other more subversive idea’s out there. There is enough very smart people employed in the RE sector now and I hope that what ever barriers are put in place by the Abbott some one will come up with an idea/process of how to bypass it.

  • http://sustainingcommunity.wordpress.com/ Graeme Stuart

    Thanks for the article. I really don’t understand the fierceness of the opposition to renewables. Vested interests are scarey.

  • sean

    Abbott & Co will have a marvellous time wondering what the hell happened as more and more people throw solar on their roof.

    with solar still cheaper than electricity tony will have to make some serious changes to how electricity is priced (although i think that is a state issue) or he will wind up with egg on his face.