rss
8

Germany finances major push into home battery storage for solar

Print Friendly

The German government has responded to the next big challenge in its energy transition – storing the output from the solar boom it has created – by doing exactly what it has successfully done to date: greasing the wheels of finance to bring down the cost of new technology.

Over the past five years, Germany has been largely responsible for priming an 80 per cent fall in the price of solar modules. Now it is looking at bringing down the cost of the next piece in the puzzle of its energy transition – battery storage.

At its disposal is the giant state-owned but independently run development bank KfW. It performs in the clean energy space a similar function to Australia’s recently created and imminently doomed Clean Energy Finance Corp, but at such a scale that is not contemplated in most countries, possibly with the exception of China.

It has assets of more than €500 billion, and lent €73 billion last year – with one-third of that targeted at renewables and climate investments. Over the past three years it provided €24 billion in loans for energy efficiency investment in homes, leveraging a total investment of €58 billion, helping insulate and seal more than 2 million homes, employing 200,000 people a year and saving more than 150 million tonnes of carbon.

Six months ago, it began a new program to finance the introduction of battery storage into homes and small business, which it says is absolutely essential if the “energiewende”, the German expression for its energy transition – is to successfully move to the next phase and beyond 40 per cent renewable penetration.

The energy storage financing program has generated a higher than expected response.  Already 1,900 homes and small businesses have put their hands up for loans and grants (provided by the Environment Ministry) to install new solar systems and a battery storage system in their home. Around €32 million in loans has already been allocated and €5 million in grants, about 10 per cent of the sums allocated in the initial phase of the program.

Unlike the subsidised uptake of solar PV enabled by the deployment of generous feed-in tariffs, the support mechanism for energy storage is more cautious. Indeed, KfW is looking for investors who are willing to take a loss on their investment.

“The market for energy storage systems is very young  … batteries are still very expensive  … and the economics don’t yet work,” program manager Dr Holger Papenfuss, told RenewEconomy in an interview in KfW’s sprawling headquarters in Germany’s financial centre of Frankfurt this week.

In fact, even with the assistance of the loans and grants, it is still not economically viable. Which is why KfW has stepped in to ensure that the commercial banks provide the funds for development.

The program is relying on “early adopters” and “renewable pioneers” – the same profile that were the first to get into electric vehicles, or solar panels a decade ago – who have the money and are willing to accept a negative return on their investment. Right now, Papenfuss says, people would be better off selling power to the grid.

So what’s motivating them? Being independent of the large power producers, and hedging bets in the face of rising electricity prices.

According to Papenfuss, households will spend between €20,000 and  €28,000 on solar and battery, depending on the size of the system. The battery component – it is targeting lead acid and lithium-ion batteries – is between  €8,000 and  €12,000, and the grants for this average around €3,000 (or about 30 per cent of the battery cost).

The average loan for the whole system is around  €17,000, but it is not offered at a discount. At just 1.5 per cent, the interest rates probably don’t need to come down any lower in any case. KfW’s function is to simply ensure that funds are made available for deployment by commercial banks, who may not touch an unprofitable venture otherwise.

Papenfuss says KfW is targeting 20,000 to 30,000 under its loan program, suggesting a commitment of at least €300 million.

KfW’s aim, according to Axel Nawrath, a member of the KfW Bankengruppe executive board, is to ensure that the output of wind and solar must be “more decoupled” from the grid. Which means that the grid is not necessarily required to accept the output just because the wind happens to be blowing a lot at the time, or the sun is shining.

“The success of the energy turnaround will entirely depend on integrating electricity from renewable sources into our energy system on a reliable, permanent basis,” he said in his announcement earlier this year.

Storage means that the energy output can be held in reserve. The idea is to even out the peaks and troughs which is making it difficult for other generators to stay in business. This is seen as critical as the level of renewable penetration rises to around 40 per cent – a level expected in Germany within the next 10 years.

In a perfect world, the output might look something like this graph below, as illustrated  by Citi in a recent analysis. It would spread solar and even wind output through the day, and cause less headaches for the other plants required to fill in the gaps between the variable output of wind and solar.

citi storageAccording to Papenfuss, households participating in the scheme will spend between  €20,000 and  €28,000 on solar and storage, depending on the size of the system (the average size is expected to be around 7kW for the solar array and around 4kWh for the battery).

The battery component is between  €8,000 and  €12,000, the grants average around €3,000 (or about 30 per cent of the battery cost) and the average loan for the whole system is around  €17,000.

The program is not open to systems of more than 30kW, and nor is it open to solar arrays that were installed before December 31 last year. They are deemed to have already gotten a good enough deal from the FiTs.

Papenfuss says that to make sense, battery storage needs to be half the cost it is now. This program is designed to set that price fall in motion.  He expects the costs to start to fall in 2014, and within two years could be offering a positive return. At that point, he says, the grant component is likely to be withdrawn, although the loan finance program will likely continue.

Over the longer term, KfW hopes that the program will help define standards for use of storage systems.  Papenfuss expects storage systems to then focus on wind power and other larger solar systems – allowing owners to earn a fee for storing energy and releasing it at certain times.

(Editors note: Rather than listening to the new Australian parliament debate climate change and clean energy, RE’s editor has chosen to flee, at least temporarily, to Germany, where he has discovered most politicians believe that planet Earth is, in fact, round. This is the first of a series of articles on Germany’s energie-wende, its energy transition that will likely have  a major influence on the pace of change in the rest of the world. Many want it to succeed, some want it to fail).

RenewEconomy Free Daily Newsletter

Share this:

  • Keith

    …. and the Australian government is busy (seeking to) dismantle anything involved with renewable energy.

    Given Germany’s track record as an industrial economy, not sure we are making a winning bet here.

  • Lars

    Giles – can I recommend you compile a database of all the articles written about Germany over the past couple of years. You will see one story after another of forward thinking, even from the likes of the energy generators who realise that their old models are dead and looking to become key partners in the roll out of decentralised energy.

    Australia’s CEFC really only was to provide financing at possibly beneficial rates to encourage investment in future renewable energy production sources. Why on earth the current government sees that as a bad policy from the former Labour government, I cannot understand, other than to presume that Grant King and other king pins in the coal mining sector are actually dictating Australian policy.

    For all its shortcomings and even hypocrisy (e.g. supporting coal mining expansion), at least the Labour government (perhaps only due to the Green Party insistence), did provide thought leadership and a vision for our future. I do not see this from Tony Abbott. No vision except to pander to people’s self interest.

    Keep the articles coming. All of us here in Australia are looking forward to energy storage to become price competitive so that we can make our own choices. Hopefully we will all be so generous to remember to thank Germany’s leaders and citizens for leading the way and making this possibility come sooner rather than later.

  • Ferdinand Swart

    Businesses can store their solar energy in their workers e-cars by day, so save on storage.

  • Leigh Baker

    Far better to talk about where change IS happening and how it is being generated – Germany sounds like a good export market for some of our locally produced green products, like Clean Tech Finalist Elevare Energy.

  • Dissenter

    Sounds good, from an Australian point of view.

    However, in July 2013 solar delivered 5.1 TWh in Germany, in December 2012 0.5 TWh, in January 2013 0.35 TWh. Germany is a winter (November – February) peaking country.

    Could somebody explain me how home battery storage could help to solve this matching problem?

    • JonathanMaddox

      Batteries aren’t much good for seasonal storage, but wind tends to be strong in the wintertime, so batteries can still help to smooth and improve the penetration of wind generation (providing domestic batteries are able to charge from the grid, I guess).

      Daily buffering of summertime solar excess generation can enable the seasonal shutdown of coal-fired plants. Running them for half the year is much better than running them all year!

      Long-term seasonal storage of excess summertime solar energy for use in the winter can and must wait until intermittent renewables are actually producing more power than can actually be used in the summertime. At that point, the menu of seasonal storage options will be clearer. Power-to-gas is one which some German developers think is promising : the existing natural gas network includes storage facilities good for several months’ worth of consumption due to the seasonality of gas consumption.

      http://energystoragejournal.com/wind-instrument-power-to-gas-technology/

  • Alex

    Whenever I meet Germans (and I meet a few) I always thank them for making our solar more affordable.

  • bkf11

    €2,000-3,000 per kWh of battery storage. Am I reading that right? Even considering control electronics etc, that’s way too much. Eos Energy Storage is offering Zinc air batteries at $160/kWh. Sure that’s in large volumes (6 MWh) and production is currently limited and they’re fairly new players but still, if you have €300m to spend, they should be able to do a deal right? Even current electric vehicle battery packs would be a lot cheaper. Something doesn’t add up.