We might blow our carbon budget sooner than we think

Published by

Shrink That Footprint

If global carbon emissions continue to grow as they have in the last decade we will burn through the 2°C carbon budget by 2035.

That is the grim reality of extending historical emissions growth into the IPCC’s cumulative carbon budgets.

In its new report the IPCC stated that to have an even chance of limiting warming to less than 2°C (since the period 1861–1880) it will require keeping cumulative CO2 emissions from all anthropogenic sources to less than 840 GtC.

By 2011 mankind had already emitted 531 GtC.  (See our carbon emissions and sinks piece)

If global carbon emissions continue to grow at 2% each year, as they have done over the last decade, we will blow through the 840 GtC carbon budget at the start of 2035.

The more stringent target of 800 GtC, that gives us a 66% chance of limiting warming to 2°C, is exhausted in 2032.  The more lax goal of 880 GtC, that gives us a 33% of limiting warming to 2°C, follows shortly afterwards in 2037.  If non-CO2 greenhouse gas concentrations increase, aerosols are reduced or the permafrost begins to melt these dates will be dragged forward.  The reverse will push them back.

Our current emissions path will leave us committed to more than  2°C of warming in just 22 years.  It would also commit us to much more warming beyond that given the economic inertia of global carbon emissions.

In fact the 2°C carbon budget is so stringent that even if global carbon emissions stopped growing and remained flat for the coming decades we would still break the 2°C budget in 2041, less than 30 years from now.

In the graphic above we show the speed at which we exhaust the 2°C  budget based on different annual emissions growth rate scenarios.

The first one is the same as our initial chart and shows that if emissions grow at 2% each year we break the 2°C budget in 2035.  In the second we see that if annual emissions remain constant at a 2011 level we break the 2°C budget in 2041.  The third shows that if annual emissions decline at 2% per year we will break the 2°C budget in 2058.

To reach 2100 within the 840 GtC budget (>50%) emissions need to decline at 3.5% per year, beginning immediately.  If action is delayed until 2020 annual reductions of  6%/year are required.  Such reductions would be largely dependent on the deployment of negative emission technologies.

The gap between where we are and where we need to be is enormous.

This is the nature of our problem:

We have a coal problem.  We have an oil problem.  We have a gas problem.  We have a deforestation problem.

WE HAVE A CARBON PROBLEM!!!!!!!!!

And our lack of ambition in dealing with it is quite astonishing.

Share
Published by

Recent Posts

Consumers need renewables, but the gentailers are going for gas – and the ESEM cavalry is still over the horizon

Australia's major gentailers show no interest in wind and solar, the new market mechanism will…

15 October 2026

Solar Insiders Podcast: Is ultra-cheap PV still within reach?

Arena's head of solar, Dan Sturrock, on the agency's progress towards the 30-30-30 target as…

15 October 2026

“Playing catch-up:” Sunshot targets cheaper construction in quest for ultra-low cost solar

Arena says the pursuit of ultra-low cost solar is making "good progress" at the panel…

15 October 2026

Long lead times for syncons, gas turbines complicate energy market transition, major supplier says

Gas turbines aren't the only large equipment with long lead times.

14 October 2026

Why the old tradie business model won’t deliver all-electric homes | SwitchedOn Australia

All Electric Homes founder Trent Jones warns that a shortage of skilled tradies, fragmented business…

14 October 2026

Webinar: Hard-earned lessons for BESS operators – warranties, diagnostics, and contract design

For asset owners, buyers, managers and O&M teams, the webinar will cover performance metrics, service…

14 October 2026