Like running Hazelwood for 106 years: Labor says Dutton’s nuke plan will be akin to a carbon bomb

Published by

Emissions from coal and gas could grow by 1.7 billion tonnes by 2050 if their use is extended another 15 years, under the Coalition’s nuclear power plans, an analysis from the federal government has found. 

The government evaluated data from the 2024 Integrated System Plan by the Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO), which provides a road map for Australia’s energy transition for the national energy market.

If coal and gas were extended to 2040 to pave the way for the coalition’s nuclear energy plan, the additional CO2-equivalent emissions created would be almost four times Australia’s current output, the government said. 

The output would be the equivalent of keeping all of Australia’s cars on the road for another 40 years or having the nation’s most polluting plant – Hazelwood in Victoria – run for 106 years.

Federal Energy Minister Chris Bowen said the government was working to lower energy prices and emissions after a decade of delays.

But the progress was “precarious”, Mr Bowen said, and any future delays would impede the government’s emission goals. 

“The coalition needs to come clean about its plan to reduce emissions and meet Australia’s energy needs,” he said. 

Federal Opposition Leader Peter Dutton and the coalition have pledged to build seven nuclear plants across five states on the sites of coal-fired power stations if they win government.

An election must be held by May 17, 2025. 

Plans to build nuclear plants could cost up to $600 billion and the coalition has said nuclear reactors could be online by 2037, although most experts say nuclear is unlikely to be built in Australia before the late 2040s, due to the planning, regulatory, investment, labour and technology issues.

Wayne Smith from the Smart Energy Council said extending coal and gas for future nuclear power would be a “carbon bomb” for Australia and its emissions.

“This is coal keeper on steroids,” he told AAP. 

“It’s coal keeper and gas keeper.

“You increase coal and gas, you reduce solar and renewables; you increase pollution and you increase power bills. 

“That’s a really dangerous deal.”

Mr Smith said nuclear and solar “don’t play well together”. 

“They cancel each other out,” he said.

AAP will seek comment from Mr Dutton’s office. 

AAP

Share
Published by

Recent Posts

Queensland state utilities continue exodus from wind farms with sale of half share in new project

A third state owned utility backs out of ownership of a wind farm development in…

12 July 2026

State’s stand-alone solar fail: The energy transition should deliver more than a new landlord

Western Power's stand-alone power system program is not an energy transition solution. It is a…

10 July 2026

Energy Insiders Podcast: Electric truck network starts to take shape

Electric trucks are suddenly big news in Australia. We catch up with NewVolt's Anthony Headlam…

10 July 2026

Watchdog warns spike in home battery complaints could damage consumer trust

Home batteries are flying off shelves and the consumer watchdog wants stronger protection to maintain…

10 July 2026

Offshore wind developers pray for bipartisan support ahead of key state election

Victoria's offshore wind developers are much more optimistic than they were a year ago, but…

10 July 2026

State utility bets on Australian-first compressed CO2 “energy dome,” with up to 12 hours of storage

Victoria's Latrobe Valley will soon host a ground-breaking long-duration energy storage facility capable of continuously…

10 July 2026