Like running Hazelwood for 106 years: Labor says Dutton’s nuke plan will be akin to a carbon bomb

Published by

Emissions from coal and gas could grow by 1.7 billion tonnes by 2050 if their use is extended another 15 years, under the Coalition’s nuclear power plans, an analysis from the federal government has found. 

The government evaluated data from the 2024 Integrated System Plan by the Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO), which provides a road map for Australia’s energy transition for the national energy market.

If coal and gas were extended to 2040 to pave the way for the coalition’s nuclear energy plan, the additional CO2-equivalent emissions created would be almost four times Australia’s current output, the government said. 

The output would be the equivalent of keeping all of Australia’s cars on the road for another 40 years or having the nation’s most polluting plant – Hazelwood in Victoria – run for 106 years.

Federal Energy Minister Chris Bowen said the government was working to lower energy prices and emissions after a decade of delays.

But the progress was “precarious”, Mr Bowen said, and any future delays would impede the government’s emission goals. 

“The coalition needs to come clean about its plan to reduce emissions and meet Australia’s energy needs,” he said. 

Federal Opposition Leader Peter Dutton and the coalition have pledged to build seven nuclear plants across five states on the sites of coal-fired power stations if they win government.

An election must be held by May 17, 2025. 

Plans to build nuclear plants could cost up to $600 billion and the coalition has said nuclear reactors could be online by 2037, although most experts say nuclear is unlikely to be built in Australia before the late 2040s, due to the planning, regulatory, investment, labour and technology issues.

Wayne Smith from the Smart Energy Council said extending coal and gas for future nuclear power would be a “carbon bomb” for Australia and its emissions.

“This is coal keeper on steroids,” he told AAP. 

“It’s coal keeper and gas keeper.

“You increase coal and gas, you reduce solar and renewables; you increase pollution and you increase power bills. 

“That’s a really dangerous deal.”

Mr Smith said nuclear and solar “don’t play well together”. 

“They cancel each other out,” he said.

AAP will seek comment from Mr Dutton’s office. 

AAP

Share
Published by

Recent Posts

Network data blackouts: Why community-led energy projects are so difficult to deliver in Australia

An eight-year struggle to build a community battery has led to a simple proposal: show…

3 August 2026

“A very real risk of breaking:” Councils demand solar recycling as they face avalanche of panels into landfills

Councils fear the consequences of millions of tonnes of solar panels expected in next decade…

3 August 2026

Long in solar, short on storage: Zen Energy faces liquidation as administrators blame high risk strategy

Administrators to renewable energy company Zen Energy point to high risk strategy for company failure,…

3 August 2026

Renewables and electrification help build farm resilience amidst the fuel and fertiliser crisis

The best renewable energy projects won't be the ones that replace farming. They'll be the…

3 August 2026

A battery with every wind turbine | Energy Insiders

Goldwind’s John Titchen explains why and how all new wind turbines could come with their…

3 August 2026

A new oil refinery commissioned in the mid-2030s is just burning money that makes emissions

Isn’t there something better that we should be doing than ensuring we have full tanks…

3 August 2026