Like running Hazelwood for 106 years: Labor says Dutton’s nuke plan will be akin to a carbon bomb

Published by

Emissions from coal and gas could grow by 1.7 billion tonnes by 2050 if their use is extended another 15 years, under the Coalition’s nuclear power plans, an analysis from the federal government has found. 

The government evaluated data from the 2024 Integrated System Plan by the Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO), which provides a road map for Australia’s energy transition for the national energy market.

If coal and gas were extended to 2040 to pave the way for the coalition’s nuclear energy plan, the additional CO2-equivalent emissions created would be almost four times Australia’s current output, the government said. 

The output would be the equivalent of keeping all of Australia’s cars on the road for another 40 years or having the nation’s most polluting plant – Hazelwood in Victoria – run for 106 years.

Federal Energy Minister Chris Bowen said the government was working to lower energy prices and emissions after a decade of delays.

But the progress was “precarious”, Mr Bowen said, and any future delays would impede the government’s emission goals. 

“The coalition needs to come clean about its plan to reduce emissions and meet Australia’s energy needs,” he said. 

Federal Opposition Leader Peter Dutton and the coalition have pledged to build seven nuclear plants across five states on the sites of coal-fired power stations if they win government.

An election must be held by May 17, 2025. 

Plans to build nuclear plants could cost up to $600 billion and the coalition has said nuclear reactors could be online by 2037, although most experts say nuclear is unlikely to be built in Australia before the late 2040s, due to the planning, regulatory, investment, labour and technology issues.

Wayne Smith from the Smart Energy Council said extending coal and gas for future nuclear power would be a “carbon bomb” for Australia and its emissions.

“This is coal keeper on steroids,” he told AAP. 

“It’s coal keeper and gas keeper.

“You increase coal and gas, you reduce solar and renewables; you increase pollution and you increase power bills. 

“That’s a really dangerous deal.”

Mr Smith said nuclear and solar “don’t play well together”. 

“They cancel each other out,” he said.

AAP will seek comment from Mr Dutton’s office. 

AAP

Share
Published by

Recent Posts

Solar and battery households help grid by importing more during day and exporting more in evening peaks

The surge in home batteries is working as intended - with households boosting demand in…

30 April 2026

Equitable gas exit or costly death spiral? New report says the choice is now up to governments

Consumer groups call for strong action from governments as a new report reveals the huge…

30 April 2026

Batteries both big and small have reshaped the grid and forced wholesale prices down, AEMO says

AEMO credits the surge in grid scale and home batteries for supporting more renewables, cutting…

30 April 2026

State stumps up $10.8 million to help customers electrify as city’s gas network shuts down

State government provides funds to help homes and businesses electrify as the owner of the…

29 April 2026

US predicts stunning 80 GW increase in big solar, wind, and battery storage in next year – despite Trump

If Trump had every heard of the EIA it is likely he would have scrapped…

29 April 2026

“When can I get a job?” Community leaders say coal country ready – and waiting – for offshore wind

As conservative lobby groups continue to push for a "rethink" of Victoria's offshore wind plans,…

29 April 2026