Like running Hazelwood for 106 years: Labor says Dutton’s nuke plan will be akin to a carbon bomb

Published by

Emissions from coal and gas could grow by 1.7 billion tonnes by 2050 if their use is extended another 15 years, under the Coalition’s nuclear power plans, an analysis from the federal government has found. 

The government evaluated data from the 2024 Integrated System Plan by the Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO), which provides a road map for Australia’s energy transition for the national energy market.

If coal and gas were extended to 2040 to pave the way for the coalition’s nuclear energy plan, the additional CO2-equivalent emissions created would be almost four times Australia’s current output, the government said. 

The output would be the equivalent of keeping all of Australia’s cars on the road for another 40 years or having the nation’s most polluting plant – Hazelwood in Victoria – run for 106 years.

Federal Energy Minister Chris Bowen said the government was working to lower energy prices and emissions after a decade of delays.

But the progress was “precarious”, Mr Bowen said, and any future delays would impede the government’s emission goals. 

“The coalition needs to come clean about its plan to reduce emissions and meet Australia’s energy needs,” he said. 

Federal Opposition Leader Peter Dutton and the coalition have pledged to build seven nuclear plants across five states on the sites of coal-fired power stations if they win government.

An election must be held by May 17, 2025. 

Plans to build nuclear plants could cost up to $600 billion and the coalition has said nuclear reactors could be online by 2037, although most experts say nuclear is unlikely to be built in Australia before the late 2040s, due to the planning, regulatory, investment, labour and technology issues.

Wayne Smith from the Smart Energy Council said extending coal and gas for future nuclear power would be a “carbon bomb” for Australia and its emissions.

“This is coal keeper on steroids,” he told AAP. 

“It’s coal keeper and gas keeper.

“You increase coal and gas, you reduce solar and renewables; you increase pollution and you increase power bills. 

“That’s a really dangerous deal.”

Mr Smith said nuclear and solar “don’t play well together”. 

“They cancel each other out,” he said.

AAP will seek comment from Mr Dutton’s office. 

AAP

Share
Published by

Recent Posts

Golden moment: Australia’s biggest wind farm becomes first to reach 1 GW of output

Australia's biggest operating wind farm has set a stunning new record, becoming the first in…

12 June 2026

The quiet battery: What household batteries reveal about flexibility before full orchestration

The passive battery is not a new phenomenon. What is new is that its value…

12 June 2026

State utility eyes 8-12 hour energy storage investment after “standout” success of four-hour big battery

State-owned utility says it is in discussions to invest in non-lithium technologies with up to…

12 June 2026

Depleted batteries and very expensive gas: How a two-day heatwave led to a near doubling of quarterly prices

Batteries have been protecting consumers from price spikes in most states over summer. But they…

12 June 2026

Solar Insiders Podcast: The public power company plugging the gaps

State Electricity Commission CEO Chris Miller on how the government-owned energy company is filling gaps…

12 June 2026

Australia’s electricity market needs better price signals that reflect local conditions

Australia’s electricity prices ignore location, even though the grid doesn’t. This mismatch drives congestion, curtailment,…

12 June 2026