Wind

How “supersized” wind turbines could boost value of wind energy to the grid

Published by

A new study published by the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) has shown that “supersized wind turbines” can possibly enhance the value of wind energy to the electricity system by around $US4-5/MWh.

The new study, published in the journal Wind Engineering, highlights how the recent upscaling of wind turbine size – which includes nameplate capacity, rotor diameter, and tower height – has been primarily focused on reducing the Levelised Cost of Electricity (LCoE) of wind energy.

However, as the authors note, “with wind’s levelized cost of energy now comparable with that of other generating resources, other design considerations besides cost-minimization have grown in importance,” such as wind’s increasing market penetration beginning to impose challenges on national electrical grids.

By supersizing wind turbines, the Berkeley Lab researchers found that the value of wind energy could be enhanced to the electricity system and provide other “hidden” benefits which illustrate the importance of expanding the focus of wind turbine design beyond direct-cost minimisation and including a broader set of factors that impact the value of wind energy to the electricity grid.

This is not the first time this particular theory has been tested. Previous research conducted by Berkeley Lab earlier this year found that larger turbines in capacity-constrained wind power markets could potentially enable further LCoE reduction of approximately $US6/MWh.

Other research, conducted by Norwegian consultancy DNV GL, identified a number of potential solutions to the logistical challenges associated with deploying ever-larger wind turbines – such as innovative transportation, segmented or hybrid blades, and on-site manufacturing.

However, the LCoE of wind energy is now comparable with that of other generating sources, meaning that other design considerations besides cost-minimisation have been allowed to grow in importance.

Berkeley Lab’s new research, therefore, investigates the expanded design need and analyses the impact of large wind turbines on grid-system value.

The study, therefore, demonstrates what the authors describe as a “possible double dividend” – namely, that larger rotors relative to nameplate capacity combined with taller towers might not only reduce the LCoE of wind energy but could also enhance the value of wind energy while providing additional hidden benefits which stem from the fact that larger wind turbines spread wind output proportionately over more hours of the year.

Berkeley Lab’s report analysed recent hourly wholesale pricing patterns and hourly wind profiles for wind plants located across the United States’ seven organised wholesale markets and found that, in regions where wind penetration has reached approximately 20%, supersized wind turbines could already boost wholesale energy and capacity value by $US2-3/MWh on average, as compared to turbines deployed in the recent past.

Across all the United States’ wholesale markets, the average value boost is $US1-2/MWh, while specific plants in some areas could see value enhancement already in the realm of around $US5/MWh.

The report also found that these wholesale market value benefits can be augmented by three additional possible advantages of increased wind turbine size, including reduced transmission expenditure due to greater transmission utilization, lower balancing costs for the electricity system due to lower aggregate wind output variability, and lower financing costs due to less long-term wind output uncertainty.

When adding these additional benefits, which sum up to around $US2/MWh, to the energy and capacity value boost of around $US2-3/MWh seen in regions with higher wind penetrations, you end up with an aggregate benefit averaging between $US4-5/MWh in areas with higher wind penetration.

Moreover, these possible benefits add to the existing $US6/MWh of potential LCoE advantage of supersizing wind turbines already discovered by Berkeley in research published earlier this year, yielding a potential benefit in supersizing wind turbines of around $US10/MWh.

Of course, as Berkeley Lab explains, the “degree to which these advantages are ultimately realized, and at what point turbine size plateaus, will be determined by future wholesale price patterns, the success of continued design and materials optimization, social acceptance and regulatory hurdles, and the logistical constraints of transporting and erecting even-larger blades, towers, and nacelle components.”

Joshua S. Hill is a Melbourne-based journalist who has been writing about climate change, clean technology, and electric vehicles for over 15 years. He has been reporting on electric vehicles and clean technologies for Renew Economy and The Driven since 2012. His preferred mode of transport is his feet.

Joshua S Hill

Joshua S. Hill is a Melbourne-based journalist who has been writing about climate change, clean technology, and electric vehicles for over 15 years. He has been reporting on electric vehicles and clean technologies for Renew Economy and The Driven since 2012. His preferred mode of transport is his feet.

Share
Published by

Recent Posts

Fast lane to electric, and Snowy blowouts | Energy Insiders

Bruce Hardy from the Energy Futures Foundation on the fast track to electric transport, and…

29 October 2026

WA renewable energy target sends investors the signal they need – at a critical time

A strong state target for renewables sends the message that WA is a stable market.…

29 October 2026

Ratings system designed to restore trust in wind and solar developers goes live, with first batch scoring well

Online rating tool that ranks renewable energy developers and transmission companies against seven key criteria,…

29 October 2026

“Anti-renewables populism is the largest unpriced risk:” But poll data shows support is growing, even in hot zones

Polling by Squadron Energy finds higher support than expected in western Victoria and central NSW,…

29 October 2026

LNP hits brakes on pumped hydro project, spooked by Snowy 2.0 cost blowout

Contracting for huge pumped hydro project has reportedly been suspended by the state treasurer and…

29 October 2026

Snowy 2.0: The potentially $50 billion shambles that really needs a proper cost-benefit analysis

Even now, with $12 billion sunk, stopping Snowy 2.0 may be the least-worst decision. It…

29 October 2026