Categories: CommentaryRenewables

Wind power doesn’t affect property prices: NREL

Published by
In another major study released today on wind farms and property values, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) analyzed more than 50,000 home sales near 67 wind facilities in 27 counties across nine U.S. states, yet was unable to uncover any impacts to nearby home property values.
“This is the second of two major studies we have conducted on this topic [the first was published in 2009 – download the 2009 LBNL Report], and in both studies [using two different datasets] we find no statistical evidence that operating wind turbines have had any measureable impact on home sales prices,” says Ben Hoen, the lead author of the new report.Mr Hoen is a researcher in the Environmental Energy Technologies Division of Berkeley Lab.
The new study, the laboratory said in a news release, used a number of sophisticated techniques to control for other potential impacts on home prices, including collecting data that spanned a time period from well before the wind facilities’ development was announced to after they were constructed and operating. This allowed researchers to control for any pre-existing differences in home sales prices across their sample and any changes that occurred due to the housing bubble.This study, the most comprehensive to-date, builds on both the previous Berkeley Lab study as well a number of other academic and published U.S. studies, which also generally find no measureable impacts near operating turbines.“Although there have been claims of significant property value impacts near operating wind turbines that regularly surface in the press or in local communities, strong evidence to support those claims has failed to materialize in all of the major U.S. studies conducted thus far,” says Mr. Hoen.  “Moreover, our findings comport with the large set of studies that have investigated other potentially similar disamenities, such as high voltage transmission lines, land fills, and noisy roads, which suggest that widespread impacts from wind turbines would be either relatively small or nonexistent.”The report was authored by Ben Hoen (Berkeley Lab), Jason P. Brown (formerly USDA, now Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City), Thomas Jackson (Texas A & M and Real Property Analytics), Ryan Wiser (Berkeley Lab), Mark Thayer (UC San Diego) and Peter Cappers (Berkeley Lab). The research was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.

This article was originally published on the AWEA blog Into The Wind

Share
Published by
Tags: wind energy

Recent Posts

China claims title for world’s tallest wind turbine using tower made of concrete and steel

A wind turbine with a record-breaking hub height of more than 200 metres has been…

12 October 2026

“No economic case:” Global experts say nuclear has role in some countries, but makes no sense in Australia

As opposition parties talk nuclear, a new global report from energy experts say it would…

12 October 2026

Australia’s most powerful battery set free of massive “shock absorber” contract after delay to Eraring coal closure

Australia's most powerful battery now free to trade its full capacity on market after its…

10 October 2026

Look, no turbines! Natural landscape returns at site of decommissioned wind farm

The site of one of Australia's very first wind farms now shows little evidence of…

10 October 2026

Australia’s quiet role in the electrification rallying cry for the COP we never got to host

The "35 by 35" electrification goal has an Australian origin that the government seems to…

9 October 2026

The Queensland LNP plan for coal-powered data centres could cost taxpayers $20 billion a pop

If we fail to ensure data centres pay for new renewables and storage to cover…

9 October 2026