Home » Policy & Planning » Fewer, bigger turbines approved as huge green hydrogen project wins federal head-start funding

Fewer, bigger turbines approved as huge green hydrogen project wins federal head-start funding

Vestas construction wind farm sunset
Image: Vestas

Plans to install up to 6 gigawatts of onshore wind and solar and produce 2 million tonnes of green ammonia a year near Kalbarri in Western Australia has been named as a winner of the federal government’s hydrogen head start program after a successful nip and tuck on its project design.

The Murchison Hydrogen Renewables (MHR), a development owned by Danish giant Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners, has also won federal environment approval after agreeing to make a number of changes across the huge project.

These include the decision to use fewer but more powerful turbines, and to trim the solar footprint while boosting PV output. The changes will slightly increase its overall footprint, while decreasing its disturbance footprint, or ecosystem impact.

The approval has been followed by the news on Thursday confirming that the first 1,500 megawatt (MW) stage of the Murchison project has been awarded up to $814 million in production incentives from the federal government’s Hydrogen Headstart program.

The funding, announced by federal energy minister Chris Bowen, will be paid via the Australian Renewable Energy Agency at production milestones over 10 years to help accelerate the project’s development. Stage one is expected to produce 900,000 tonnes of green ammonia each year.

Bowen says the funding scheme aims to help projects like Murchison to bridge the commercial gap between the cost of producing renewable hydrogen and the market price.

MHR is located 20km north of Kalbarri – identified as one of the best locations in the world for green hydrogen production, due to wind and solar resources, limited cyclone risk and proximity to key offtake markets.

The original plans for the project, which joined the EPBC queue in May 2022, proposed to install around 700 wind turbines with an estimated 3.7 gigawatts (GW) installed capacity and roughly 1.5 GW of solar over an area of around 10,000 hectares of solar panels.

Other components of the originally proposed project include battery storage, a desalination plant with seawater intake and brine discharge pipes, an electrolyser, hydrogen storage, an ammonia production plant and storage tanks and a marine export terminal.

The move to adjust the design of the project to reduce its impact on protected flora and fauna and ecosystems follows the federal environment minister’s determination in July 2022 that the project is a “controlled action” and therefore required to undergo full assessments under the federal EPBC Act.

Chief among the changes being proposed is to cut turbine numbers by 178 to a total of 522, while maintaining the installed capacity at the originally proposed ~3.7 GW. This suggests the revised turbines would have a capacity of around 7 megawatts (MW) each, up from around 5 MW in the original proposal.

This is in keeping with the evolution of wind turbines over the past few years, which has seen them ratchet up in size and capacity – giving developers wriggle room on project design without compromising generation capacity.

But while bigger turbines can mean fewer turbines – and can therefore appease some community and environmental concerns – bigger turbines are, of course, much more imposing and occupy bigger individual footprints than their smaller counterparts.

In the case of the Murchison project, the permanent footprint of each turbine in the revised proposal will be approximately 0.9 hectares (ha), with a total final footprint of 470 ha for all turbines (formerly 0.2 ha, 140 ha).

But the developer notes that while the permanent impact from the wind turbine component has increased, the total terrestrial clearing footprint has decreased.

“Each wind turbine location is proposed to be micro-sited to avoid direct impacts to MNES [matters of national environmental significance], including Malleefowl mounds and Threatened flora,” the referral says.

“This approach will ensure that impacts are minimised and the increase in clearing footprint will not increase the potential impacts to MNES. There is not expected to be significant change to MNES impacts as a result of this change.”

Source: Murchison Hydrogen Renewables

For the solar farm, meanwhile, the footprint has been revised to up to 7,000 ha; a reduction of 3,000 ha. The referral documents say this has been achieved through “layout optimisation, enabling an increased solar energy output from a reduced footprint” – and resulting in a reduction in clearing.

The Murchison Hydrogen Renewables project was awarded major project status by the federal government in August of last year, in a move that CIP says will help it to navigate complex regulatory regimes.

Fiona Simon, the CEO of the Australian Hydrogen Council says the choice of the project as the first official recipient of Hydrogen Headstart funding means it can now proceed to its next phase with private investors, partners, community and the government.

“Hydrogen Headstart is not a cash handout for the hydrogen industry, but an incentive applied once these large-scale projects start producing green hydrogen or derivatives to bridge the commercial gap,” Simon said on Thursday.

“It is a key lever to support a nascent industry that will unlock significant benefits particularly in our regions – from new jobs, skills and infrastructure, to decarbonisation of industrial sectors and the creation of new export opportunities.

“There is no ‘do nothing option’ when it comes to hydrogen,” Simon says.

“We need it as a large-scale option for decarbonising energy that requires molecules. And we need it as a chemical solution to produce commodities like green ammonia and green iron. And we also need to remain a trusted energy partner across Asia and the export of molecules is critical to Australia’s ongoing prosperity.”

MHR also has Lead Agency Status from the WA government. The revised project referral will now undergo full federal environmental assessments under the EPBC Act.

Related Topics

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Get up to 3 quotes from pre-vetted solar (and battery) installers.
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x