Home » Commentary » FactCheck: does the new climate deal let China do nothing for 16 years?

FactCheck: does the new climate deal let China do nothing for 16 years?

The Conversation

USA GOVERNMENT REPUBLICANS SENATE
Republican senator Mitch McConnell says the new climate deal will let China “do nothing” until 2030. Far from it. EPA/MICHAEL REYNOLDS/AAP

 

As I read the agreement it requires the Chinese to do nothing at all for 16 years while these carbon emissions regulations are creating havoc in my state and around the country.” – US Republican Senate leader Mitch McConnell, November 12, 2014.

Far from “doing nothing”, China will be building the world’s largest renewable energy system over the next 16 years. This is something that China has already started doing – so the targets agreed upon are feasible, if arduous.

As part of the US-China climate deal announced on Wednesday, China is committing to raise the proportion of renewables in its total energy system to 20%. As renewables and nuclear power currently account for 10% of China’s total energy consumption, this implies a doubling of its renewables commitment. The challenge is illustrated in the graph below.

Energy use from zero-emission sources in China. Authors, Author provided

This is why Chinese president Xi Jinping can commit China to peaking its carbon emissions by 2030. In reality, we and many other observers expect China’s carbon emissions to peak well before that date, so there is room for more dramatic announcements to come from the Chinese side.

In fact, at the recent APEC meeting in Beijing, China’s national Energy Bureau stated that China’s coal consumption would probably peak by 2020, at about 4.2 billion tonnes per year. So carbon emissions could peak just a little after that – and certainly before 2030.

Mitch McConnell and many other commentators have placed all their emphasis on China’s building of a “black” energy system, comprising new coal and other fossil fuel facilities, while ignoring the enormous commitments already made to renewables and a complementary green energy system.

By our reckoning, the leading edge of change in China’s energy system is already more green than black, and the total system is greening at such a rate that the goals just announced as part of the climate deal should certainly be met.

The White House, in its statement announcing the joint deal, said that for China to meet its commitment:

…it will require China to deploy an additional 800-1000 gigawatts of nuclear, wind, solar and other zero-emission generation capacity by 2030 – more than all the coal-fired power plants that exist in China today and close to total current electricity generation capacity in the United States.

These are enormous numbers, but they fit with China’s current capacity and goals. In 2013 China’s generating capacity from all sources reached 1,247 gigawatts. Its generating capacity from water, wind and sun (leaving nuclear to one side) has already reached 378 gigawatts, far in front of all other industrial countries (see below and here).

Renewable electric power capacity in China and other countries in 2013. Based on REN21(2014) Global Status Report, Author provided

China’s National Development and Reform Commission has already announced plans to raise that total to 550 gigawatts by 2017. This is a commitment to renewables on a colossal scale that dwarfs that of other countries.

This goal would call for an additional 1,000 gigawatts of renewable generation capacity to be built over the next 15 years – or 1.33 gigawatts (equivalent to a large nuclear power station) every week.

The difference between the commitments made by China and those by other countries is that China is committing to renewables as part of an industrial strategy to focus its industrial growth around such clean industries and technologies. As part of the 12th Five year Plan, China has singled out seven strategic industries that it sees as being the pillars of its economy – including electric vehicles, renewable energy, and energy efficiency.

There is likely to be even greener tinge to the 13th Five Year Plan, currently under discussion and due to run from 2016 to 2020.

So far from “doing nothing” over the next 16 years, China is transforming its economy and energy system so that water, wind and solar power will be its driving forces. Other countries – not least close US allies such as Australia and Canada – would be wise to pay attention.

Verdict

False. China has an extensive plan to curtail its emissions between now and 2030, including building renewable energy facilities on a far larger scale than any other nation. Honouring its new climate pact with the United States will involve doing a lot more than nothing.

Review

The view that China’s announced target is feasible but arduous is correct. It is also true that a peaking of carbon dioxide emissions in China is possible before 2025, given strong Chinese policy efforts and future changes to the rate and nature of China’s economic growth. China has extensive policies in place to constrain the growth in energy use and to shift away from coal, and under this commitment China will intensify those efforts.

It is important to understand that China’s effort is much broader even than the authors of this FactCheck suggest. The text correctly points out the importance of renewable energy expansion, but improvements in energy efficiency and the transformation of China’s economic structure towards high-value manufacturing and services will do more to dampen carbon emissions growth. In my own analysis, my colleagues and I found that a carbon dioxide peak around 2025 would be achieved by maintaining a 4% per year improvement in economy-wide energy productivity, and a 1.0-1.5% annual reduction in the carbon intensity of energy supply. The former comes through better technical efficiency and structural change, the latter through a shift from coal to gas, renewables and nuclear power.

 

Source: The Conversation. Reproduced with permission.

Comments

13 responses to “FactCheck: does the new climate deal let China do nothing for 16 years?”

  1. barrie harrop Avatar
    barrie harrop

    Hoping Aust PM reads this,as he is repeating the GOP line.

  2. Alan Baird Avatar
    Alan Baird

    Who’d have thought it? The Grand Ole Party got it wrong! They work like this: feel a strong angry emotion and then think of ANYTHING to say. But don’t think twice as you might change your mind. It’s almost enough to make us join in the next war they give. Oh that’s right, we’ve done that.

    1. Peter Avatar
      Peter

      Indeed ‘think of anything to say’ and then rely on the Murdoch press to replay it over and over. I guess they hope that the myth will start to become ‘fact’ in some people’s mind and not just the GOP true believers.

      1. Alan Baird Avatar
        Alan Baird

        Got it in one…

  3. michael Avatar
    michael

    how long after the peak will it be reduced to say 5% below 2015 gross emissions? isn’t that the important questions, to limit the overall CO2 in the atmosphere.

    At their 2012 rate of 9,860 Million tonnes of emissions, over the next 13 years (generously flat lining instead of increasing), china will put 128,180 Million tonnes of CO2 into the atmosphere. To put in context, isn’t Australia projected at around 700 Million tonnes in 2020? but somehow the villian is the one already reducing emission, not the one project to keep increasing for at least the next 10 years…

  4. John P Avatar
    John P

    What is it about the world of politics that such intellectually inadequate people so routinely rise to the top?

    1. Peter Thomson Avatar
      Peter Thomson

      Money.

      1. John P Avatar
        John P

        Yes, that would explain it!

    2. Susan Kraemer Avatar

      Fox News. It doesn’t have to be plausible that a nation of a billion could rebuild an electricity sector on New Years Eve 2029.

      (It merely has to sound right to less than half of the nation, so its lucky half have an IQ under 100.)

  5. D. John Hunwick Avatar
    D. John Hunwick

    This article had to be written to draw critics attention to the fact that it is rubbish (ie lies) to say China will be doing “nothing” in the next few 15 years or so. If there is one country messing it all up, it is the USA. If Congress does not support renewables who is the culprit – not China

  6. Roger Brown Avatar
    Roger Brown

    Surprise , the Yanks are Lying again !

  7. Peter Thomson Avatar
    Peter Thomson

    It strikes me that China is doing the whole industrial revolution story in fast-forward – going from next to nothing to a peak fossil fuel economy with all its pollution problems in 60 years or so, as opposed to the 180 years taken by the West. Now they are fast-forwarding into renewables and decarbonising their economy, reducing their reliance on FF.
    Perhaps it’s the advantage of having a non-democratic Government, which is prepared to invest in very long-range planning. Whatever, they are on track to avoid the trap of being heavily reliant on fossil energy supplies by the time they start to run short.

    1. MorinMoss Avatar
      MorinMoss

      Not necessarily from being a non-democracy but definitely due to strong central planning. Of course, if they only pursuing a strictly dirty coal & heavy oil strategy, it would be a disaster for all of us.

Get up to 3 quotes from pre-vetted solar (and battery) installers.